This chapter discusses SQL processing, optimization methods, and how the optimizer chooses a specific plan to execute SQL.
The chapter contains the following sections:
A SQL statement can be executed in many different ways, such as full table scans, index scans, nested loops, and hash joins. The query optimizer determines the most efficient way to execute a SQL statement after considering many factors related to the objects referenced and the conditions specified in the query. This determination is an important step in the processing of any SQL statement and can greatly affect execution time.
Note:The optimizer might not make the same decisions from one version of Oracle to the next. In recent versions, the optimizer might make different decisions, because better information is available.
The output from the optimizer is a plan that describes an optimum method of execution. The Oracle server provides query optimization.
For any SQL statement processed by Oracle, the optimizer performs the operations listed in Table 13-1.
Evaluation of expressions and conditions
The optimizer first evaluates expressions and conditions containing constants as fully as possible.
For complex statements involving, for example, correlated subqueries or views, the optimizer might transform the original statement into an equivalent join statement
Choice of optimizer goals
The optimizer determines the goal of optimization. See "Choosing an Optimizer Goal".
Choice of access paths
For each table accessed by the statement, the optimizer chooses one or more of the available access paths to obtain table data. See "Understanding Access Paths for the Query Optimizer".
Choice of join orders
For a join statement that joins more than two tables, the optimizer chooses which pair of tables is joined first, and then which table is joined to the result, and so on. See "How the Query Optimizer Chooses Execution Plans for Joins".
You can influence the optimizer's choices by setting the optimizer goal, and by gathering representative statistics for the query optimizer. The optimizer goal is either throughput or response time. See "Choosing an Optimizer Goal" and "Query Optimizer Statistics in the Data Dictionary".
Sometimes, the application designer, who has more information about a particular application's data than is available to the optimizer, can choose a more effective way to execute a SQL statement. The application designer can use hints in SQL statements to instruct the optimizer about how a statement should be executed.
Oracle Database Concepts for an overview of SQL processing and the optimizer
Oracle Database Data Cartridge Developer's Guide for information about the extensible optimizer
"Choosing an Optimizer Goal" for more information on optimization goals
Chapter 14, "Managing Optimizer Statistics" for information on gathering and using statistics
Chapter 16, "Using Optimizer Hints" for more information about using hints in SQL statements
By default, the goal of the query optimizer is the best throughput. This means that it chooses the least amount of resources necessary to process all rows accessed by the statement. Oracle can also optimize a statement with the goal of best response time. This means that it uses the least amount of resources necessary to process the first row accessed by a SQL statement.
Choose a goal for the optimizer based on the needs of your application:
For applications performed in batch, such as Oracle Reports applications, optimize for best throughput. Usually, throughput is more important in batch applications, because the user initiating the application is only concerned with the time necessary for the application to complete. Response time is less important, because the user does not examine the results of individual statements while the application is running.
For interactive applications, such as Oracle Forms applications or SQL*Plus queries, optimize for best response time. Usually, response time is important in interactive applications, because the interactive user is waiting to see the first row or first few rows accessed by the statement.
The optimizer's behavior when choosing an optimization approach and goal for a SQL statement is affected by the following factors:
OPTIMIZER_MODE initialization parameter establishes the default behavior for choosing an optimization approach for the instance. The possible values and description are listed in Table 13-2.
The optimizer uses a cost-based approach for all SQL statements in the session regardless of the presence of statistics and optimizes with a goal of best throughput (minimum resource use to complete the entire statement). This is the default value.
The optimizer uses a cost-based approach, regardless of the presence of statistics, and optimizes with a goal of best response time to return the first n number of rows; n can equal 1, 10, 100, or 1000.
Note: Using heuristics sometimes leads the query optimizer to generate a plan with a cost that is significantly larger than the cost of a plan without applying the heuristic.
You can change the goal of the query optimizer for all SQL statements in a session by changing the parameter value in initialization file or by the
OPTIMIZER_MODE statement. For example:
The following statement in an initialization parameter file establishes the goal of the query optimizer for all sessions of the instance to best response time:
OPTIMIZER_MODE = FIRST_ROWS_1
The following SQL statement changes the goal of the query optimizer for the current session to best response time:
ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_MODE = FIRST_ROWS_1;
If the optimizer uses the cost-based approach for a SQL statement, and if some tables accessed by the statement have no statistics, then the optimizer uses internal information, such as the number of data blocks allocated to these tables, to estimate other statistics for these tables.
To specify the goal of the query optimizer for an individual SQL statement, use one of the hints in Table 13-3. Any of these hints in an individual SQL statement can override the
OPTIMIZER_MODE initialization parameter for that SQL statement.
This hint instructs Oracle to optimize an individual SQL statement with a goal of best response time to return the first n number of rows, where n equals any positive integer. The hint uses a cost-based approach for the SQL statement, regardless of the presence of statistic.
This hint explicitly chooses the cost-based approach to optimize a SQL statement with a goal of best throughput.
See Also:Chapter 16, "Using Optimizer Hints" for information on how to use hints
The statistics used by the query optimizer are stored in the data dictionary. You can collect exact or estimated statistics about physical storage characteristics and data distribution in these schema objects by using the
To maintain the effectiveness of the query optimizer, you must have statistics that are representative of the data. For table columns that contain values with large variations in number of duplicates, called skewed data, you should collect histograms.
The resulting statistics provide the query optimizer with information about data uniqueness and distribution. Using this information, the query optimizer is able to compute plan costs with a high degree of accuracy. This enables the query optimizer to choose the best execution plan based on the least cost.
If no statistics are available when using query optimization, the optimizer will do dynamic sampling depending on the setting of the
OPTMIZER_DYNAMIC_SAMPLING initialization parameter. This may cause slower parse times so for best performance, the optimizer should have representative optimizer statistics.
This section contains some of the initialization parameters specific to the optimizer. The following sections are especially useful when tuning Oracle applications.
See Also:Oracle Database Reference for information about initialization parameters
You enable optimizer features by setting the
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE initialization parameter.
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE parameter acts as an umbrella parameter for the query optimizer. This parameter can be used to enable a series of optimizer-related features, depending on the release. It accepts one of a list of valid string values corresponding to the release numbers, such as 8.0.4, 8.1.7, and 9.2.0. For example, the following setting enables the use of the optimizer features in generating query plans in Oracle 10g, Release 1.
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE parameter was introduced with the main goal to allow customers to upgrade the Oracle server, yet preserve the old behavior of the query optimizer after the upgrade. For example, when you upgrade the Oracle server from release 8.1.5 to release 8.1.6, the default value of the
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE parameter changes from 8.1.5 to 8.1.6. This upgrade results in the query optimizer enabling optimization features based on 8.1.6, as opposed to 8.1.5.
For plan stability or backward compatibility reasons, you might not want the query plans to change because of new optimizer features in a new release. In such a case, you can set the
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE parameter to an earlier version. For example, to preserve the behavior of the query optimizer to release 8.1.5, set the parameter as follows:
This statement disables all new optimizer features that were added in releases following release 8.1.5.
Note:If you upgrade to a new release and you want to enable the features available with that release, then you do not need to explicitly set the
Oracle Corporation does not recommend explicitly setting the
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE parameter to an earlier release. Instead, execution plan or query performance issues should be resolved on a case-by-case basis.
See Also:Oracle Database Reference for information about optimizer features that are enabled when you set the
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLEparameter to each of the release values
This section lists some initialization parameters that can be used to control the behavior of the query optimizer. These parameters can be used to enable various optimizer features in order to improve the performance of SQL execution.
This parameter converts literal values in SQL statements to bind variables. Converting the values improves cursor sharing and can affect the execution plans of SQL statements. The optimizer generates the execution plan based on the presence of the bind variables and not the actual literal values.
This parameter specifies the number of blocks that are read in a single I/O during a full table scan or index fast full scan. The optimizer uses the value of
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT to cost full table scans and index fast full scans. Larger values result in a cheaper cost for full table scans and can result in the optimizer choosing a full table scan over an index scan. If this parameter is not set explicitly (or is set is 0), the optimizer will use a default value of 8 when costing full table scans and index fast full scans.
This parameter controls the costing of an index probe in conjunction with a nested loop. The range of values
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING indicates percentage of index blocks in the buffer cache, which modifies the optimizer's assumptions about index caching for nested loops and IN-list iterators. A value of
100 infers that 100% of the index blocks are likely to be found in the buffer cache and the optimizer adjusts the cost of an index probe or nested loop accordingly. Use caution when using this parameter because execution plans can change in favor of index caching.
This parameter can be used to adjust the cost of index probes. The range of values is
10000. The default value is
100, which means that indexes are evaluated as an access path based on the normal costing model. A value of
10 means that the cost of an index access path is one-tenth the normal cost of an index access path.
This initialization parameter sets the mode of the optimizer at instance startup. The possible values are
FIRST_ROWS. For descriptions of these parameter values, see "OPTIMIZER_MODE Initialization Parameter".
This parameter automatically controls the amount of memory allocated for sorts and hash joins. Larger amounts of memory allocated for sorts or hash joins reduce the optimizer cost of these operations. See "PGA Memory Management".
This parameter, if set to
true, enables the query optimizer to cost a star transformation for star queries. The star transformation combines the bitmap indexes on the various fact table columns.
See Also:Oracle Database Reference for complete information about each parameter
The query optimizer determines which execution plan is most efficient by considering available access paths and by factoring in information based on statistics for the schema objects (tables or indexes) accessed by the SQL statement. The query optimizer also considers hints, which are optimization instructions placed in a comment in the statement.
See Also:Chapter 16, "Using Optimizer Hints" for detailed information on hints
The query optimizer performs the following steps:
The optimizer generates a set of potential plans for the SQL statement based on available access paths and hints.
The optimizer estimates the cost of each plan based on statistics in the data dictionary for the data distribution and storage characteristics of the tables, indexes, and partitions accessed by the statement.
The cost is an estimated value proportional to the expected resource use needed to execute the statement with a particular plan. The optimizer calculates the cost of access paths and join orders based on the estimated computer resources, which includes I/O, CPU, and memory.
Serial plans with higher costs take more time to execute than those with smaller costs. When using a parallel plan, however, resource use is not directly related to elapsed time.
The optimizer compares the costs of the plans and chooses the one with the lowest cost.
The query optimizer operations include:
Query optimizer components are illustrated in Figure 13-1.
The input to the query transformer is a parsed query, which is represented by a set of query blocks. The query blocks are nested or interrelated to each other. The form of the query determines how the query blocks are interrelated to each other. The main objective of the query transformer is to determine if it is advantageous to change the form of the query so that it enables generation of a better query plan. Several different query transformation techniques are employed by the query transformer, including:
Any combination of these transformations can be applied to a given query.
Each view referenced in a query is expanded by the parser into a separate query block. The query block essentially represents the view definition, and therefore the result of a view. One option for the optimizer is to analyze the view query block separately and generate a view subplan. The optimizer then processes the rest of the query by using the view subplan in the generation of an overall query plan. This technique usually leads to a suboptimal query plan, because the view is optimized separately from rest of the query.
The query transformer then removes the potentially suboptimal plan by merging the view query block into the query block that contains the view. Most types of views are merged. When a view is merged, the query block representing the view is merged into the containing query block. Generating a subplan is no longer necessary, because the view query block is eliminated.
For those views that are not merged, the query transformer can push the relevant predicates from the containing query block into the view query block. This technique improves the subplan of the non-merged view, because the pushed-in predicates can be used either to access indexes or to act as filters.
Often the performance of queries that contain subqueries can be improved by unnesting the subqueries and converting them into joins. Most subqueries are unnested by the query transformer. For those subqueries that are not unnested, separate subplans are generated. To improve execution speed of the overall query plan, the subplans are ordered in an efficient manner.
A materialized view is like a query with a result that is materialized and stored in a table. When a user query is found compatible with the query associated with a materialized view, the user query can be rewritten in terms of the materialized view. This technique improves the execution of the user query, because most of the query result has been precomputed. The query transformer looks for any materialized views that are compatible with the user query and selects one or more materialized views to rewrite the user query. The use of materialized views to rewrite a query is cost-based. That is, the query is not rewritten if the plan generated without the materialized views has a lower cost than the plan generated with the materialized views.
The query optimizer peeks at the values of user-defined bind variables on the first invocation of a cursor. This feature lets the optimizer determine the selectivity of any
WHERE clause condition, as well as if literals have been used instead of bind variables. On subsequent invocations of the cursor, no peeking takes place, and the cursor is shared, based on the standard cursor-sharing criteria, even if subsequent invocations use different bind values.
When bind variables are used in a statement, it is assumed that cursor sharing is intended and that different invocations are supposed to use the same execution plan. If different invocations of the cursor would significantly benefit from different execution plans, then bind variables may have been used inappropriately in the SQL statement. Bind peeking works for a specific set of clients, not all clients.
See Also:Oracle Database Data Warehousing Guide for more information on query rewrite
The estimator generates three different types of measures:
These measures are related to each other, and one is derived from another. The end goal of the estimator is to estimate the overall cost of a given plan. If statistics are available, then the estimator uses them to compute the measures. The statistics improve the degree of accuracy of the measures.
The first measure, selectivity, represents a fraction of rows from a row set. The row set can be a base table, a view, or the result of a join or a
BY operator. The selectivity is tied to a query predicate, such as
last_name = '
Smith', or a combination of predicates, such as
last_name = '
job_type = '
Clerk'. A predicate acts as a filter that filters a certain number of rows from a row set. Therefore, the selectivity of a predicate indicates how many rows from a row set will pass the predicate test. Selectivity lies in a value range from 0.0 to 1.0. A selectivity of 0.0 means that no rows will be selected from a row set, and a selectivity of 1.0 means that all rows will be selected.
If no statistics are available then the optimizer either uses dynamic sampling or an internal default value, depending on the value of the
OPTIMIZER_DYNAMIC_SAMPLING initialization parameter. Different internal defaults are used, depending on the predicate type. For example, the internal default for an equality predicate (
last_name = '
Smith') is lower than the internal default for a range predicate (
last_name > '
Smith'). The estimator makes this assumption because an equality predicate is expected to return a smaller fraction of rows than a range predicate. See "Estimating Statistics with Dynamic Sampling".
When statistics are available, the estimator uses them to estimate selectivity. For example, for an equality predicate (
last_name = '
Smith'), selectivity is set to the reciprocal of the number
n of distinct values of
last_name, because the query selects rows that all contain one out of
n distinct values. If a histogram is available on the
last_name column, then the estimator uses it instead of the number of distinct values. The histogram captures the distribution of different values in a column, so it yields better selectivity estimates. Having histograms on columns that contain skewed data (in other words, values with large variations in number of duplicates) greatly helps the query optimizer generate good selectivity estimates.
See Also:"Viewing Histograms" for a description of histograms
Cardinality represents the number of rows in a row set. Here, the row set can be a base table, a view, or the result of a join or
The cost represents units of work or resource used. The query optimizer uses disk I/O, CPU usage, and memory usage as units of work. So, the cost used by the query optimizer represents an estimate of the number of disk I/Os and the amount of CPU and memory used in performing an operation. The operation can be scanning a table, accessing rows from a table by using an index, joining two tables together, or sorting a row set. The cost of a query plan is the number of work units that are expected to be incurred when the query is executed and its result produced.
The access path determines the number of units of work required to get data from a base table. The access path can be a table scan, a fast full index scan, or an index scan. During table scan or fast full index scan, multiple blocks are read from the disk in a single I/O operation. Therefore, the cost of a table scan or a fast full index scan depends on the number of blocks to be scanned and the multiblock read count value. The cost of an index scan depends on the levels in the B-tree, the number of index leaf blocks to be scanned, and the number of rows to be fetched using the rowid in the index keys. The cost of fetching rows using rowids depends on the index clustering factor. See "Assessing I/O for Blocks, not Rows".
The join cost represents the combination of the individual access costs of the two row sets being joined, plus the cost of the join operation.
See Also:"Understanding Joins" for more information on joins
The main function of the plan generator is to try out different possible plans for a given query and pick the one that has the lowest cost. Many different plans are possible because of the various combinations of different access paths, join methods, and join orders that can be used to access and process data in different ways and produce the same result.
A join order is the order in which different join items, such as tables, are accessed and joined together. For example, in a join order of
table1 is accessed first. Next,
table2 is accessed, and its data is joined to
table1 data to produce a join of
table3 is accessed, and its data is joined to the result of the join between
The plan for a query is established by first generating subplans for each of the nested subqueries and unmerged views. Each nested subquery or unmerged view is represented by a separate query block. The query blocks are optimized separately in a bottom-up order. That is, the innermost query block is optimized first, and a subplan is generated for it. The outermost query block, which represents the entire query, is optimized last.
The plan generator explores various plans for a query block by trying out different access paths, join methods, and join orders. The number of possible plans for a query block is proportional to the number of join items in the
FROM clause. This number rises exponentially with the number of join items.
The plan generator uses an internal cutoff to reduce the number of plans it tries when finding the one with the lowest cost. The cutoff is based on the cost of the current best plan. If the current best cost is large, then the plan generator tries harder (in other words, explores more alternate plans) to find a better plan with lower cost. If the current best cost is small, then the plan generator ends the search swiftly, because further cost improvement will not be significant.
The cutoff works well if the plan generator starts with an initial join order that produces a plan with cost close to optimal. Finding a good initial join order is a difficult problem.
To execute a SQL statement, Oracle might need to perform many steps. Each of these steps either retrieves rows of data physically from the database or prepares them in some way for the user issuing the statement. The combination of the steps Oracle uses to execute a statement is called an execution plan. An execution plan includes an access path for each table that the statement accesses and an ordering of the tables (the join order) with the appropriate join method.
You can examine the execution plan chosen by the optimizer for a SQL statement by using the EXPLAIN PLAN statement. When the statement is issued, the optimizer chooses an execution plan and then inserts data describing the plan into a database table. Simply issue the EXPLAIN PLAN statement and then query the output table.
Use the SQL script
SQL to create a sample output table called
PLAN_TABLE in your schema. See "The PLAN_TABLE Output Table".
Include the EXPLAIN PLAN FOR clause prior to the SQL statement. See "Running EXPLAIN PLAN".
After issuing the EXPLAIN PLAN statement, use one of the scripts or package provided by Oracle to display the most recent plan table output. See "Displaying PLAN_TABLE Output".
The execution order in EXPLAIN PLAN output begins with the line that is the furthest indented to the right. The next step is the parent of that line. If two lines are indented equally, then the top line is normally executed first.
Example 13-1 uses EXPLAIN PLAN to examine a SQL statement that selects the
department_name for the employees whose IDs are less than 103.
EXPLAIN PLAN FOR SELECT e.employee_id, j.job_title, e.salary, d.department_name FROM employees e, jobs j, departments d WHERE e.employee_id < 103 AND e.job_id = j.job_id AND e.department_id = d.department_id;
The resulting output table in Example 13-2 shows the execution plan chosen by the optimizer to execute the SQL statement in the example:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 189 | 10 (10)| | 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 189 | 10 (10)| | 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 141 | 7 (15)| |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMPLOYEES | 3 | 60 | 4 (25)| | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| JOBS | 19 | 513 | 2 (50)| |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | JOB_ID_PK | 1 | | | | 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | DEPARTMENTS | 27 | 432 | 2 (50)| |* 7 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | DEPT_ID_PK | 1 | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - filter("E"."EMPLOYEE_ID"<103) 5 - access("E"."JOB_ID"="J"."JOB_ID") 7 - access("E"."DEPARTMENT_ID"="D"."DEPARTMENT_ID")
Each row in the output table corresponds to a single step in the execution plan. Note that the step Ids with asterisks are listed in the Predicate Information section.
See Also:Chapter 19, "Using EXPLAIN PLAN"
Each step of the execution plan returns a set of rows that either is used by the next step or, in the last step, is returned to the user or application issuing the SQL statement. A set of rows returned by a step is called a row set.
The numbering of the step Ids reflects the order in which they are displayed in response to the
PLAN statement. Each step of the execution plan either retrieves rows from the database or accepts rows from one or more row sources as input.
The following steps in Example 13-2 physically retrieve data from an object in the database:
Step 3 reads all rows of the
Step 5 looks up each
JOB_ID_PK index and finds the rowids of the associated rows in the
Step 4 retrieves the rows with rowids that were returned by Step 5 from the
Step 7 looks up each
DEPT_ID_PK index and finds the rowids of the associated rows in the
Step 6 retrieves the rows with rowids that were returned by Step 7 from the
The following steps in Example 13-2 operate on rows returned by the previous row source:
Step 2 performs the nested loop operation on
job_id in the
employees tables, accepting row sources from Steps 3 and 4, joining each row from Step 3 source to its corresponding row in Step 4, and returning the resulting rows to Step 2.
Step 1 performs the nested loop operation, accepting row sources from Step 2 and Step 6, joining each row from Step 2 source to its corresponding row in Step 6, and returning the resulting rows to Step 1.
"Understanding Access Paths for the Query Optimizer" for more information on access paths
"Understanding Joins" for more information on the methods by which Oracle joins row sources
Access paths are ways in which data is retrieved from the database. In general, index access paths should be used for statements that retrieve a small subset of table rows, while full scans are more efficient when accessing a large portion of the table. Online transaction processing (OLTP) applications, which consist of short-running SQL statements with high selectivity, often are characterized by the use of index access paths. Decision support systems, on the other hand, tend to use partitioned tables and perform full scans of the relevant partitions.
This section describes the data access paths that can be used to locate and retrieve any row in any table.
This type of scan reads all rows from a table and filters out those that do not meet the selection criteria. During a full table scan, all blocks in the table that are under the high water mark are scanned. The high water mark indicates the amount of used space, or space that had been formatted to receive data. Each row is examined to determine whether it satisfies the statement's
When Oracle performs a full table scan, the blocks are read sequentially. Because the blocks are adjacent, I/O calls larger than a single block can be used to speed up the process. The size of the read calls range from one block to the number of blocks indicated by the initialization parameter
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT. Using multiblock reads means a full table scan can be performed very efficiently. Each block is read only once.
Example 13-2, "EXPLAIN PLAN Output" contains an example of a full table scan on the
Full table scans are cheaper than index range scans when accessing a large fraction of the blocks in a table. This is because full table scans can use larger I/O calls, and making fewer large I/O calls is cheaper than making many smaller calls.
The optimizer uses a full table scan in any of the following cases:
If the query is unable to use any existing indexes, then it uses a full table scan. For example, if there is a function used on the indexed column in the query, the optimizer is unable to use the index and instead uses a full table scan.
If you need to use the index for case-independent searches, then either do not permit mixed-case data in the search columns or create a function-based index, such as
last_name), on the search column. See "Using Function-based Indexes for Performance".
If the optimizer thinks that the query will access most of the blocks in the table, then it uses a full table scan, even though indexes might be available.
If a table contains less than
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT blocks under the high water mark, which can be read in a single I/O call, then a full table scan might be cheaper than an index range scan, regardless of the fraction of tables being accessed or indexes present.
A high degree of parallelism for a table skews the optimizer toward full table scans over range scans. Examine the
DEGREE column in
ALL_TABLES for the table to determine the degree of parallelism.
Use the hint
) to instruct the optimizer to use a full table scan. For more information on the
FULL hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
You can use the
NOCACHE hints to indicate where the retrieved blocks are placed in the buffer cache. The
CACHE hint instructs the optimizer to place the retrieved blocks at the most recently used end of the LRU list in the buffer cache when a full table scan is performed.
Small tables are automatically cached according to the criteria in Table 13-4.
|Table Size||Size Criteria||Caching|
Number of blocks < 20 or 2% of total cached blocks, whichever is larger
Larger than a small table, but < 10% of total cached blocks
Oracle decides whether to cache a table based on its table scan and workload history. It caches the table only if a future table scan is likely to find the cached blocks.
> 10% of total cached blocks
Automatic caching of small tables is disabled for tables that are created or altered with the
When a full table scan is required, response time can be improved by using multiple parallel execution servers for scanning the table. Parallel queries are used generally in low-concurrency data warehousing environments, because of the potential resource usage.
See Also:Oracle Database Data Warehousing Guide
The rowid of a row specifies the datafile and data block containing the row and the location of the row in that block. Locating a row by specifying its rowid is the fastest way to retrieve a single row, because the exact location of the row in the database is specified.
To access a table by rowid, Oracle first obtains the rowids of the selected rows, either from the statement's
WHERE clause or through an index scan of one or more of the table's indexes. Oracle then locates each selected row in the table based on its rowid.
In Example 13-2, "EXPLAIN PLAN Output", an index scan is performed the
departments tables. The rowids retrieved are used to return the row data.
This is generally the second step after retrieving the rowid from an index. The table access might be required for any columns in the statement not present in the index.
Access by rowid does not need to follow every index scan. If the index contains all the columns needed for the statement, then table access by rowid might not occur.
Note:Rowids are an internal Oracle representation of where data is stored. They can change between versions. Accessing data based on position is not recommended, because rows can move around due to row migration and chaining and also after export and import. Foreign keys should be based on primary keys. For more information on rowids, see Oracle Database Advanced Application Developer's Guide.
In this method, a row is retrieved by traversing the index, using the indexed column values specified by the statement. An index scan retrieves data from an index based on the value of one or more columns in the index. To perform an index scan, Oracle searches the index for the indexed column values accessed by the statement. If the statement accesses only columns of the index, then Oracle reads the indexed column values directly from the index, rather than from the table.
The index contains not only the indexed value, but also the rowids of rows in the table having that value. Therefore, if the statement accesses other columns in addition to the indexed columns, then Oracle can find the rows in the table by using either a table access by rowid or a cluster scan.
An index scan can be one of the following types:
Oracle does I/O by blocks. Therefore, the optimizer's decision to use full table scans is influenced by the percentage of blocks accessed, not rows. This is called the index clustering factor. If blocks contain single rows, then rows accessed and blocks accessed are the same.
However, most tables have multiple rows in each block. Consequently, the desired number of rows could be clustered together in a few blocks, or they could be spread out over a larger number of blocks.
Although the clustering factor is a property of the index, the clustering factor actually relates to the spread of similar indexed column values within data blocks in the table. A lower clustering factor indicates that the individual rows are concentrated within fewer blocks in the table. Conversely, a high clustering factor indicates that the individual rows are scattered more randomly across blocks in the table. Therefore, a high clustering factor means that it costs more to use a range scan to fetch rows by rowid, because more blocks in the table need to be visited to return the data. Example 13-3 shows how the clustering factor can affect cost.
There is a table with 9 rows.
There is a non-unique index on
col1 for table.
c1 column currently stores the values
The table only has three Oracle blocks.
Case 1: The index clustering factor is low for the rows as they are arranged in the following diagram.
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 ------- ------- -------- A A A B B B C C C
This is because the rows that have the same indexed column values for
c1 are located within the same physical blocks in the table. The cost of using a range scan to return all of the rows that have the value
A is low, because only one block in the table needs to be read.
Case 2: If the same rows in the table are rearranged so that the index values are scattered across the table blocks (rather than collocated), then the index clustering factor is higher.
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 ------- ------- -------- A B C A B C A B C
This is because all three blocks in the table must be read in order to retrieve all rows with the value
This scan returns, at most, a single rowid. Oracle performs a unique scan if a statement contains a
UNIQUE or a
KEY constraint that guarantees that only a single row is accessed.
In Example 13-2, "EXPLAIN PLAN Output", an index scan is performed on the
departments tables, using the
dept_id_pk indexes respectively.
This access path is used when all columns of a unique (B-tree) index or an index created as a result of a primary key constraint are specified with equality conditions.
See Also:Oracle Database Concepts for more details on index structures and for detailed information on how a B-tree is searched
In general, you should not need to use a hint to do a unique scan. There might be cases where the table is across a database link and being accessed from a local table, or where the table is small enough for the optimizer to prefer a full table scan.
) specifies the index to use, but not an access path (range scan or unique scan). For more information on the
INDEX hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
An index range scan is a common operation for accessing selective data. It can be bounded (bounded on both sides) or unbounded (on one or both sides). Data is returned in the ascending order of index columns. Multiple rows with identical values are sorted in ascending order by rowid.
If data must be sorted by order, then use the
BY clause, and do not rely on an index. If an index can be used to satisfy an
BY clause, then the optimizer uses this option and avoids a sort.
In Example 13-4, the order has been imported from a legacy system, and you are querying the order by the reference used in the legacy system. Assume this reference is the
SELECT order_status, order_id FROM orders WHERE order_date = :b1; --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 20 | 3 (34)| | 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ORDERS | 1 | 20 | 3 (34)| |* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ORD_ORDER_DATE_IX | 1 | | 2 (50)| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("ORDERS"."ORDER_DATE"=:Z)
This should be a highly selective query, and you should see the query using the index on the column to retrieve the desired rows. The data returned is sorted in ascending order by the rowids for the
order_date. Because the index column
order_date is identical for the selected rows here, the data is sorted by rowid.
The optimizer uses a range scan when it finds one or more leading columns of an index specified in conditions, such as the following:
col1 = :b1
col1 < :b1
col1 > :b1
AND combination of the preceding conditions for leading columns in the index
col1 like 'ASD%' wild-card searches should not be in a leading position otherwise the condition
col1 like '%ASD' does not result in a range scan.
Range scans can use unique or non-unique indexes. Range scans avoid sorting when index columns constitute the
A hint might be required if the optimizer chooses some other index or uses a full table scan. The hint
) instructs the optimizer to use a specific index. For more information on the
INDEX hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
An index range scan descending is identical to an index range scan, except that the data is returned in descending order. Indexes, by default, are stored in ascending order. Usually, this scan is used when ordering data in a descending order to return the most recent data first, or when seeking a value less than a specified value.
The optimizer uses index range scan descending when an order by descending clause can be satisfied by an index.
) is used for this access path. For more information on the
INDEX_DESC hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
Index skip scans improve index scans by nonprefix columns. Often, scanning index blocks is faster than scanning table data blocks.
Skip scanning lets a composite index be split logically into smaller subindexes. In skip scanning, the initial column of the composite index is not specified in the query. In other words, it is skipped.
The number of logical subindexes is determined by the number of distinct values in the initial column. Skip scanning is advantageous if there are few distinct values in the leading column of the composite index and many distinct values in the nonleading key of the index.
Consider, for example, a table
address) with a composite index on (
employee_id). Splitting this composite index would result in two logical subindexes, one for
M and one for
For this example, suppose you have the following index data:
('F',98) ('F',100) ('F',102) ('F',104) ('M',101) ('M',103) ('M',105)
The index is split logically into the following two subindexes:
The first subindex has the keys with the value
The second subindex has the keys with the value
sex is skipped in the following query:
SELECT * FROM employees WHERE employee_id = 101;
A complete scan of the index is not performed, but the subindex with the value
F is searched first, followed by a search of the subindex with the value
A full scan is available if a predicate references one of the columns in the index. The predicate does not need to be an index driver. A full scan is also available when there is no predicate, if both the following conditions are met:
All of the columns in the table referenced in the query are included in the index.
At least one of the index columns is not null.
A full scan can be used to eliminate a sort operation, because the data is ordered by the index key. It reads the blocks singly.
Fast full index scans are an alternative to a full table scan when the index contains all the columns that are needed for the query, and at least one column in the index key has the
NULL constraint. A fast full scan accesses the data in the index itself, without accessing the table. It cannot be used to eliminate a sort operation, because the data is not ordered by the index key. It reads the entire index using multiblock reads, unlike a full index scan, and can be parallelized.
A fast full scan is faster than a normal full index scan in that it can use multiblock I/O and can be parallelized just like a table scan.
The fast full scan has a special index hint,
INDEX_FFS, which has the same format and arguments as the regular
INDEX hint. For more information on the
INDEX_FFS hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
An index join is a hash join of several indexes that together contain all the table columns that are referenced in the query. If an index join is used, then no table access is needed, because all the relevant column values can be retrieved from the indexes. An index join cannot be used to eliminate a sort operation.
You can specify an index join with the
INDEX_JOIN hint. For more information on the
INDEX_JOIN hint, see "Hints for Access Paths".
A bitmap join uses a bitmap for key values and a mapping function that converts each bit position to a rowid. Bitmaps can efficiently merge indexes that correspond to several conditions in a
WHERE clause, using Boolean operations to resolve
Note:Bitmap indexes and bitmap join indexes are available only if you have purchased the Oracle Enterprise Edition.
See Also:Oracle Database Data Warehousing Guide for more information about bitmap indexes
A cluster scan is used to retrieve, from a table stored in an indexed cluster, all rows that have the same cluster key value. In an indexed cluster, all rows with the same cluster key value are stored in the same data block. To perform a cluster scan, Oracle first obtains the rowid of one of the selected rows by scanning the cluster index. Oracle then locates the rows based on this rowid.
A hash scan is used to locate rows in a hash cluster, based on a hash value. In a hash cluster, all rows with the same hash value are stored in the same data block. To perform a hash scan, Oracle first obtains the hash value by applying a hash function to a cluster key value specified by the statement. Oracle then scans the data blocks containing rows with that hash value.
A sample table scan retrieves a random sample of data from a simple table or a complex
SELECT statement, such as a statement involving joins and views. This access path is used when a statement's
FROM clause includes the
SAMPLE clause or the
BLOCK clause. To perform a sample table scan when sampling by rows with the
SAMPLE clause, Oracle reads a specified percentage of rows in the table. To perform a sample table scan when sampling by blocks with the
BLOCK clause, Oracle reads a specified percentage of table blocks.
Example 13-6 uses a sample table scan to access 1% of the
employees table, sampling by blocks.
SELECT * FROM employees SAMPLE BLOCK (1);
------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 68 | 3 (34)| | 1 | TABLE ACCESS SAMPLE | EMPLOYEES | 1 | 68 | 3 (34)| -------------------------------------------------------------------------
The available access paths for the statement
The estimated cost of executing the statement, using each access path or combination of paths
To choose an access path, the optimizer first determines which access paths are available by examining the conditions in the statement's
WHERE clause and its
FROM clause. The optimizer then generates a set of possible execution plans using available access paths and estimates the cost of each plan, using the statistics for the index, columns, and tables accessible to the statement. Finally, the optimizer chooses the execution plan with the lowest estimated cost.
When choosing an access path, the query optimizer is influenced by the following:
You can instruct the optimizer to use a specific access path using a hint, except when the statement's
FROM clause contains
See Also:Chapter 16, "Using Optimizer Hints" for information about hints in SQL statements
For example, if a table has not been analyzed since it was created, and if it has less than
DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT blocks under the high water mark, then the optimizer thinks that the table is small and uses a full table scan. Review the
BLOCKS columns in the
ALL_TABLES table to examine the statistics.
Joins are statements that retrieve data from more than one table. A join is characterized by multiple tables in the
FROM clause, and the relationship between the tables is defined through the existence of a join condition in the
WHERE clause. In a join, one row set is called inner, and the other is called outer.
This section discusses:
As for simple statements, the optimizer must choose an access path to retrieve data from each table in the join statement.
To join each pair of row sources, Oracle must perform a join operation. Join methods include nested loop, sort merge, cartesian, and hash joins.
To execute a statement that joins more than two tables, Oracle joins two of the tables and then joins the resulting row source to the next table. This process is continued until all tables are joined into the result.
The query optimizer considers the following when choosing an execution plan:
The optimizer first determines whether joining two or more tables definitely results in a row source containing at most one row. The optimizer recognizes such situations based on
KEY constraints on the tables. If such a situation exists, then the optimizer places these tables first in the join order. The optimizer then optimizes the join of the remaining set of tables.
For join statements with outer join conditions, the table with the outer join operator must come after the other table in the condition in the join order. The optimizer does not consider join orders that violate this rule. Similarly, when a subquery has been converted into an antijoin or semijoin, the tables from the subquery must come after those tables in the outer query block to which they were connected or correlated. However, hash antijoins and semijoins are able to override this ordering condition in certain circumstances.
With the query optimizer, the optimizer generates a set of execution plans, according to possible join orders, join methods, and available access paths. The optimizer then estimates the cost of each plan and chooses the one with the lowest cost. The optimizer estimates costs in the following ways:
The cost of a nested loops operation is based on the cost of reading each selected row of the outer table and each of its matching rows of the inner table into memory. The optimizer estimates these costs using the statistics in the data dictionary.
The optimizer also considers other factors when determining the cost of each operation. For example:
A smaller sort area size is likely to increase the cost for a sort merge join because sorting takes more CPU time and I/O in a smaller sort area. See "PGA Memory Management" for information on sizing of SQL work areas.
A larger multiblock read count is likely to decrease the cost for a sort merge join in relation to a nested loop join. If a large number of sequential blocks can be read from disk in a single I/O, then an index on the inner table for the nested loop join is less likely to improve performance over a full table scan. The multiblock read count is specified by the initialization parameter
With the query optimizer, the optimizer's choice of join orders can be overridden with the
ORDERED hint. If the
ORDERED hint specifies a join order that violates the rule for an outer join, then the optimizer ignores the hint and chooses the order. Also, you can override the optimizer's choice of join method with hints.
See Also:Chapter 16, "Using Optimizer Hints" for more information about optimizer hints
It is very important to ensure that the inner table is driven from (dependent on) the outer table. If the inner table's access path is independent of the outer table, then the same rows are retrieved for every iteration of the outer loop, degrading performance considerably. In such cases, hash joins joining the two independent row sources perform better.
See Also:"Cartesian Joins"
A nested loop join involves the following steps:
The optimizer determines the driving table and designates it as the outer table.
The other table is designated as the inner table.
For every row in the outer table, Oracle accesses all the rows in the inner table. The outer loop is for every row in outer table and the inner loop is for every row in the inner table. The outer loop appears before the inner loop in the execution plan, as follows:
NESTED LOOPS outer_loop inner_loop
This section discusses the outer and inner loops for one of the nested loops in the query in Example 13-1.
... | 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 141 | 7 (15)| |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMPLOYEES | 3 | 60 | 4 (25)| | 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| JOBS | 19 | 513 | 2 (50)| |* 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | JOB_ID_PK | 1 | | | ...
In this example, the outer loop retrieves all the rows of the
employees table. For every employee retrieved by the outer loop, the inner loop retrieves the associated row in the
In the execution plan in Example 13-2, the outer loop and the equivalent statement are as follows:
3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMPLOYEES SELECT e.employee_id, e.salary FROM employees e WHERE e.employee_id < 103
The execution plan in Example 13-2 shows the inner loop being iterated for every row fetched from the outer loop, as follows:
4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| JOBS 5 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | JOB_ID_PK SELECT j.job_title FROM jobs j WHERE e.job_id = j.job_id
The optimizer uses nested loop joins when joining small number of rows, with a good driving condition between the two tables. You drive from the outer loop to the inner loop, so the order of tables in the execution plan is important.
The outer loop is the driving row source. It produces a set of rows for driving the join condition. The row source can be a table accessed using an index scan or a full table scan. Also, the rows can be produced from any other operation. For example, the output from a nested loop join can be used as a row source for another nested loop join.
The inner loop is iterated for every row returned from the outer loop, ideally by an index scan. If the access path for the inner loop is not dependent on the outer loop, then you can end up with a Cartesian product; for every iteration of the outer loop, the inner loop produces the same set of rows. Therefore, you should use other join methods when two independent row sources are joined together.
If the optimizer is choosing to use some other join method, you can use the
table1 table2) hint, where
table2 are the aliases of the tables being joined.
For some SQL examples, the data is small enough for the optimizer to prefer full table scans and use hash joins. This is the case for the SQL example shown in Example 13-7, "Hash Joins". However, you can add a
USE_NL to instruct the optimizer to change the join method to nested loop. For more information on the
USE_NL hint, see "Hints for Join Operations".
The outer loop of a nested loop can be a nested loop itself. You can nest two or more outer loops together to join as many tables as needed. Each loop is a data access method, as follows:
SELECT STATEMENT NESTED LOOP 3 NESTED LOOP 2 (OUTER LOOP 3.1) NESTED LOOP 1 (OUTER LOOP 2.1) OUTER LOOP 1.1 - #1 INNER LOOP 1.2 - #2 INNER LOOP 2.2 - #3 INNER LOOP 3.2 - #4
Hash joins are used for joining large data sets. The optimizer uses the smaller of two tables or data sources to build a hash table on the join key in memory. It then scans the larger table, probing the hash table to find the joined rows.
This method is best used when the smaller table fits in available memory. The cost is then limited to a single read pass over the data for the two tables.
The optimizer uses a hash join to join two tables if they are joined using an equijoin and if either of the following conditions are true:
A large amount of data needs to be joined.
A large fraction of a small table needs to be joined.
In Example 13-7, the table
orders is used to build the hash table, and
order_items is the larger table, which is scanned later.
SELECT o.customer_id, l.unit_price * l.quantity FROM orders o ,order_items l WHERE l.order_id = o.order_id; -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 665 | 13300 | 8 (25)| |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 665 | 13300 | 8 (25)| | 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ORDERS | 105 | 840 | 4 (25)| | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ORDER_ITEMS | 665 | 7980 | 4 (25)| -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("L"."ORDER_ID"="O"."ORDER_ID")
Sort merge joins can be used to join rows from two independent sources. Hash joins generally perform better than sort merge joins. On the other hand, sort merge joins can perform better than hash joins if both of the following conditions exist:
The row sources are sorted already.
A sort operation does not have to be done.
However, if a sort merge join involves choosing a slower access method (an index scan as opposed to a full table scan), then the benefit of using a sort merge might be lost.
Sort merge joins are useful when the join condition between two tables is an inequality condition (but not a nonequality) like <, <=, >, or >=. Sort merge joins perform better than nested loop joins for large data sets. You cannot use hash joins unless there is an equality condition.
In a merge join, there is no concept of a driving table. The join consists of two steps:
Sort join operation: Both the inputs are sorted on the join key.
Merge join operation: The sorted lists are merged together.
If the input is already sorted by the join column, then a sort join operation is not performed for that row source.
The optimizer can choose a sort merge join over a hash join for joining large amounts of data if any of the following conditions are true:
The join condition between two tables is not an equi-join.
Because of sorts already required by other operations, the optimizer finds it is cheaper to use a sort merge than a hash join.
To instruct the optimizer to use a sort merge join, apply the
USE_MERGE hint. You might also need to give hints to force an access path.
There are situations where it is better to override the optimize with the
USE_MERGE hint. For example, the optimizer can choose a full scan on a table and avoid a sort operation in a query. However, there is an increased cost because a large table is accessed through an index and single block reads, as opposed to faster access through a full table scan.
For more information on the
USE_MERGE hint, see "Hints for Join Operations".
A Cartesian join is used when one or more of the tables does not have any join conditions to any other tables in the statement. The optimizer joins every row from one data source with every row from the other data source, creating the Cartesian product of the two sets.
The optimizer uses Cartesian joins when it is asked to join two tables with no join conditions. In some cases, a common filter condition between the two tables could be picked up by the optimizer as a possible join condition. In other cases, the optimizer may decide to generate a Cartesian product of two very small tables that are both joined to the same large table.
An outer join extends the result of a simple join. An outer join returns all rows that satisfy the join condition and also returns some or all of those rows from one table for which no rows from the other satisfy the join condition.
This operation is used when an outer join is used between two tables. The outer join returns the outer (preserved) table rows, even when there are no corresponding rows in the inner (optional) table.
In a regular outer join, the optimizer chooses the order of tables (driving and driven) based on the cost. However, in a nested loop outer join, the order of tables is determined by the join condition. The outer table, with rows that are being preserved, is used to drive to the inner table.
The optimizer uses nested loop joins to process an outer join in the following circumstances:
It is possible to drive from the outer table to inner table.
Data volume is low enough to make the nested loop method efficient.
For an example of a nested loop outer join, you can add the
USE_NL hint to Example 13-8 to instruct the optimizer to use a nested loop. For example:
SELECT /*+ USE_NL(c o) */ cust_last_name, sum(nvl2(o.customer_id,0,1)) "Count"
The optimizer uses hash joins for processing an outer join if the data volume is high enough to make the hash join method efficient or if it is not possible to drive from the outer table to inner table.
The order of tables is determined by the cost. The outer table, including preserved rows, may be used to build the hash table, or it may be used to probe one.
Example 13-8 shows a typical hash join outer join query. In this example, all the customers with credit limits greater than 1000 are queried. An outer join is needed so that you do not miss the customers who do not have any orders.
SELECT cust_last_name, sum(nvl2(o.customer_id,0,1)) "Count" FROM customers c, orders o WHERE c.credit_limit > 1000 AND c.customer_id = o.customer_id(+) GROUP BY cust_last_name; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 168 | 3192 | 6 (17)| | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 168 | 3192 | 6 (17)| |* 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 260 | 4940 | 5 (0) | |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CUSTOMERS | 260 | 3900 | 5 (0) | |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ORD_CUSTOMER_IX | 105 | 420 | 0 (0) | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 3 - filter("C"."CREDIT_LIMIT">1000) 4 - access("C"."CUSTOMER_ID"="0"."CUSTOMER_ID"(+)) filter("O"."CUSTOMER_ID"(+)>0)
The query looks for customers which satisfy various conditions. An outer join returns
NULL for the inner table columns along with the outer (preserved) table rows when it does not find any corresponding rows in the inner table. This operation finds all the
customers rows that do not have any
In this case, the outer join condition is the following:
customers.customer_id = orders.customer_id(+)
The components of this condition represent the following:
The outer table is
The inner table is
The join preserves the
customers rows, including those rows without a corresponding row in
You could use a
EXISTS subquery to return the rows. However, because you are querying all the rows in the table, the hash join performs better (unless the
EXISTS subquery is not nested).
In Example 13-9, the outer join is to a multitable view. The optimizer cannot drive into the view like in a normal join or push the predicates, so it builds the entire row set of the view.
SELECT c.cust_last_name, sum(revenue) FROM customers c, v_orders o WHERE c.credit_limit > 2000 AND o.customer_id(+) = c.customer_id GROUP BY c.cust_last_name; ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 144 | 4608 | 16 (32)| | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 144 | 4608 | 16 (32)| |* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 663 | 21216 | 15 (27)| |* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | CUSTOMERS | 195 | 2925 | 6 (17)| | 4 | VIEW | V_ORDERS | 665 | 11305 | | | 5 | HASH GROUP BY | | 665 | 15960 | 9 (34)| |* 6 | HASH JOIN | | 665 | 15960 | 8 (25)| |* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ORDERS | 105 | 840 | 4 (25)| | 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ORDER_ITEMS | 665 | 10640 | 4 (25)| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("O"."CUSTOMER_ID"(+)="C"."CUSTOMER_ID") 3 - filter("C"."CREDIT_LIMIT">2000) 6 - access("O"."ORDER_ID"="L"."ORDER_ID") 7 - filter("O"."CUSTOMER_ID">0)
The view definition is as follows:
CREATE OR REPLACE view v_orders AS SELECT l.product_id, SUM(l.quantity*unit_price) revenue, o.order_id, o.customer_id FROM orders o, order_items l WHERE o.order_id = l.order_id GROUP BY l.product_id, o.order_id, o.customer_id;
When an outer join cannot drive from the outer (preserved) table to the inner (optional) table, it cannot use a hash join or nested loop joins. Then it uses the sort merge outer join for performing the join operation.
The optimizer uses sort merge for an outer join:
If a nested loop join is inefficient. A nested loop join can be inefficient because of data volumes.
The optimizer finds it is cheaper to use a sort merge over a hash join because of sorts already required by other operations.
A full outer join acts like a combination of the left and right outer joins. In addition to the inner join, rows from both tables that have not been returned in the result of the inner join are preserved and extended with nulls. In other words, full outer joins let you join tables together, yet still show rows that do not have corresponding rows in the joined tables.
The query in Example 13-10 retrieves all departments and all employees in each department, but also includes:
Any employees without departments
Any departments without employees
SELECT d.department_id, e.employee_id FROM employees e FULL OUTER JOIN departments d ON e.department_id = d.department_id ORDER BY d.department_id;
The statement produces the following output:
DEPARTMENT_ID EMPLOYEE_ID ------------- ----------- 10 200 20 201 20 202 30 114 30 115 30 116 ... 270 280 178 207 125 rows selected.