MySQL 9.4 Reference Manual Including MySQL NDB Cluster 9.4
      MySQL Server offers a number of choices in storage engines. Since
      both NDB and
      InnoDB can serve as transactional
      MySQL storage engines, users of MySQL Server sometimes become
      interested in NDB Cluster. They see
      NDB as a possible alternative or
      upgrade to the default InnoDB storage
      engine in MySQL. While NDB and
      InnoDB share common characteristics,
      there are differences in architecture and implementation, so that
      some existing MySQL Server applications and usage scenarios can be
      a good fit for NDB Cluster, but not all of them.
    
      In this section, we discuss and compare some characteristics of
      the NDB storage engine used by NDB
      9.4 with InnoDB used in
      MySQL 9.4. The next few sections provide a technical
      comparison. In many instances, decisions about when and where to
      use NDB Cluster must be made on a case-by-case basis, taking all
      factors into consideration. While it is beyond the scope of this
      documentation to provide specifics for every conceivable usage
      scenario, we also attempt to offer some very general guidance on
      the relative suitability of some common types of applications for
      NDB as opposed to
      InnoDB back ends.
    
      NDB Cluster 9.4 uses a mysqld
      based on MySQL 9.4, including support for
      InnoDB 1.1. While it is possible to
      use InnoDB tables with NDB Cluster, such tables
      are not clustered. It is also not possible to use programs or
      libraries from an NDB Cluster 9.4 distribution with
      MySQL Server 9.4, or the reverse.
    
      While it is also true that some types of common business
      applications can be run either on NDB Cluster or on MySQL Server
      (most likely using the InnoDB storage
      engine), there are some important architectural and implementation
      differences. Section 25.2.6.1, “Differences Between the NDB and InnoDB Storage Engines”,
      provides a summary of the these differences. Due to the
      differences, some usage scenarios are clearly more suitable for
      one engine or the other; see
      Section 25.2.6.2, “NDB and InnoDB Workloads”. This in turn
      has an impact on the types of applications that better suited for
      use with NDB or
      InnoDB. See
      Section 25.2.6.3, “NDB and InnoDB Feature Usage Summary”, for a comparison
      of the relative suitability of each for use in common types of
      database applications.
    
      For information about the relative characteristics of the
      NDB and
      MEMORY storage engines, see
      When to Use MEMORY or NDB Cluster.
    
See Chapter 18, Alternative Storage Engines, for additional information about MySQL storage engines.