Table of Contents Previous Next PDF


Transactions in CORBA Server Applications

Transactions in CORBA Server Applications
This topic includes the following sections:
These sections describe how to integrate transactions into an Oracle Tuxedo server application. Before you begin, you should read Chapter 1, “Introducing Transactions.”
Notes:
Technical support for third party CORBA Java ORBs should be provided by their respective vendors. Oracle Tuxedo does not provide any technical support or documentation for third party CORBA Java ORBs.
Integrating Transactions in an Oracle Tuxedo Client and Server Application
This topic includes the following sections:
Transaction Support in CORBA Applications
Oracle Tuxedo supports transactions in the following ways:
You can assign transactional policies to an object’s interface so that when the object is invoked, the Oracle Tuxedo system can start a transaction automatically for that object, if a transaction has not already been started, and commit or roll back the transaction when the method invocation is complete. You use transactional policies on objects in conjunction with an XA resource manager and database when you want to delegate all the transaction commit and rollback responsibilities to that resource manager.
Objects involved in a transaction can force a transaction to be rolled back. That is, after an object has been invoked within the scope of a transaction, the object can invoke rollback_only() on the TransactionCurrent object to mark the transaction for rollback only. This prevents the current transaction from being committed. An object may need to mark a transaction for rollback if an entity, typically a database, is otherwise at risk of being updated with corrupt or inaccurate data.
When an object is polled, the object may veto the current transaction by invoking rollback_only() on the TransactionCurrent object. In addition, if the current transaction is to be rolled back, objects have an opportunity to skip any writes to a database. If no object vetoes the current transaction, the transaction is committed.
The following sections explain how you can use object activation policies and transaction policies to determine the transactional behavior you want in your objects. Note that these policies apply to an interface and, therefore, to all operations on all objects implementing that interface.
Note:
Making an Object Automatically Transactional
The Oracle Tuxedo system provides the always transactional policy, which you can define on an object’s interface to have the Oracle Tuxedo system start a transaction automatically when that object is invoked and a transaction has not already been scoped. When an invocation on that object is completed, the Oracle Tuxedo system commits or rolls back the transaction automatically. Neither the server application, nor the object implementation, needs to invoke the TransactionCurrent object in this situation; the Oracle Tuxedo system automatically invokes the TransactionCurrent object on behalf of the server application.
Assign the always transactional policy to an object’s interface when:
If you want an object to be automatically transactional, assign the following policies to that object’s interface in the Implementation Configuration File:
 
Note:
Database cursors cannot span transactions. However, in C++, the CourseSynopsisEnumerator object in the Oracle Tuxedo University sample applications uses a database cursor to find matching course synopses from the University database. Because database cursors cannot span transactions, the activate_object() operation on the CourseSynopsisEnumerator object reads all matching course synopses into memory. Note that the cursor is managed by an iterator class and is thus not visible to the CourseSynopsisEnumerator object.
Enabling an Object to Participate in a Transaction
If you want an object to be able to be invoked within the scope of a transaction, you can assign the optional transaction policies to that object’s interface. The optional transaction policy may be appropriate for an object that does not perform any database write operations, but that you want to have the ability to be invoked during a transaction.
You can use the following policies, when they are specified in the Implementation Configuration File for that object’s interface, to make an object optionally transactional:
 
When the transaction policy is optional, if the AUTOTRAN parameter is enabled in the application’s UBBCONFIG file, the implementation is transactional. Servers containing transactional objects must be configured within a group associated with an XA-compliant resource manager.
If the object does perform database write operations, and you want the object to be able to participate in a transaction, assigning the always transactional policy is generally a better choice. However, if you prefer, you can use the optional policy and encapsulate any write operations within invocations on the TransactionCurrent object. That is, within your operations that write data, scope a transaction around the write statements by invoking the TransactionCurrent object to, respectively, begin and commit or roll back the transaction, if the object is not already scoped within a transaction. This ensures that any database write operations are handled transactionally. This also introduces a performance efficiency: if the object is not invoked within the scope of a transaction, all the database read operations are nontransactional, and, therefore, more streamlined.
Note:
Preventing an Object from Being Invoked While a Transaction Is Scoped
In many cases, it may be critical to exclude an object from a transaction. If such an object is invoked during a transaction, the object returns an exception, which may cause the transaction to be rolled back. Oracle Tuxedo CORBA provides the never transaction policy, which you can assign to an object’s interface to specifically prevent that object from being invoked within the course of a transaction, even if the current transaction is suspended.
This transaction policy is appropriate for objects that write durable state to disk that cannot be rolled back, such as for an object that writes data to a disk that is not managed by an XA resource manager. Having this capability in your client/server application is crucial if the client application does not or cannot know if some of its invocations are causing a transaction to be scoped. Therefore, if a transaction is scoped, and an object with this policy is invoked, the transaction can be rolled back.
To prevent an object from being invoked while a transaction is scoped, assign the following policies to that object’s interface in the Implementation Configuration File:
 
Excluding an Object from an Ongoing Transaction
In some cases, it may be appropriate to permit an object to be invoked during the course of a transaction but also keep that object from being a part of the transaction. If such an object is invoked during a transaction, the transaction is automatically suspended. After the invocation on the object is completed, the transaction is automatically resumed. Oracle Tuxedo CORBA provides the ignore transaction policy for this purpose.
The ignore transaction policy may be appropriate for an object such as a factory that typically does not write data to disk. By excluding the factory from the transaction, the factory can be available to other client invocations during the course of a transaction. In addition, using this policy can introduce an efficiency into your server application because it minimizes the overhead of invoking objects transactionally.
To prevent any transaction from being propagated to an object, assign the following policies to that object’s interface in the Implementation Configuration File:
 
Assigning Policies
For information about how to create an Implementation Configuration File and specify policies on objects, see “Step 4: Define the in-memory behavior of objects” in “Steps for Creating an Oracle Tuxedo CORBA Server Application” in the CORBA Programming Reference.
Using an XA Resource Manager
The Transaction Manager Server (TMS) handles object state data automatically. For an example, the University sample C++ application in the drive:\TUX8\samples\corba\university\transactions directory uses the Oracle TMS as an example of a relational database management service (RDBMS).
Using any XA resource manager imposes specific requirements on how different objects managed by the server application may read and write data to that database, including the following:
Other XA resource managers, such as Oracle8i, do not require a transaction context for read and write operations. If an application attempts a write operation without a transaction context, Oracle8i will start a local transaction implicitly, in which case the application needs to commit the local transaction explicitly.
This characteristic of XA resource managers actually makes the design problems associated with handling object state data in the event of a rollback much simpler. Transactional objects can always delegate the commit and rollback responsibilities to the XA resource manager, which greatly simplifies the task of implementing a server application.
Opening an XA Resource Manager
If an object’s interface has the always or optional transaction policy, you must invoke the TP::open_xa_rm() operation in the Server::initialize() operation in the Server object. The resource manager is opened using the information provided in the OPENINFO parameter, which is in the GROUPS section of the UBBCONFIG file. Note that the default version of the Server::initialize() operation automatically opens the resource manager.
If you have an object that does not write data to disk and that participates in a transaction—the object typically has the optional transaction policy—you still need to include an invocation to the TP::open_xa_rm() operation. In that invocation, specify the NULL resource manager.
Closing an XA Resource Manager
If your Server object’s Server::initialize() operation opens an XA resource manager, you must include the following invocation in the Server::release() operation:
TP::close_xa_rm();
Transactions and Object State Management
This topic includes the following sections:
If you need transactions in your Oracle Tuxedo CORBA client and server application, you can integrate transactions with object state management in a few different ways. In general, Oracle Tuxedo CORBA can automatically scope the transaction for the duration of an operation invocation without requiring you to make any changes to your application’s logic or the way in which the object writes durable state to disk.
Delegating Object State Management to an XA Resource Manager
Using an XA resource manager, such as Oracle, generally simplifies the design problems associated with handling object state data in the event of a rollback. (The Oracle resource manager is used in the Oracle Tuxedo CORBA University sample C++ applications). Transactional objects can always delegate the commit and rollback responsibilities to the XA resource manager, which greatly simplifies the task of implementing a server application. This means that process- or method-bound objects involved in a transaction can write to a database during transactions, and can depend on the resource manager to undo any data written to the database in the event of a transaction rollback.
Waiting Until Transaction Work Is Complete Before Writing to the Database
The transaction activation policy is a good choice for objects that maintain state in memory that you do not want written, or that cannot be written, to disk until the transaction work is complete. When you assign the transaction activation policy to an object, the object:
When the transaction work is complete, Oracle Tuxedo CORBA invokes each transaction-bound object’s Tobj_ServantBase::deactivate_object() operation passing a reason code that can be either DR_TRANS_COMMITTING or DR_TRANS_ABORTED. If the variable is DR_TRANS_COMMITTING, the object can invoke its database write operations. If the variable is DR_TRANS_ABORTED, the object skips its write operations.
When to Assign the Transaction Activation Policy
Assigning the transaction activation policy to an object may be appropriate in the following situations:
This introduces a performance efficiency because it reduces the number of database write operations that may need to be rolled back.
If Oracle Tuxedo CORBA passes the reason DR_TRANS_COMMITTING, the object can, if necessary, invoke rollback_only() on the TransactionCurrent object. Note that if you do make an invocation to rollback_only() from within the Tobj_ServantBase::deactivate_object() operation, then deactivate_object() is not invoked again.
Transaction Policies to Use with the Transaction Activation Policy
To give an object the ability to wait until the transaction is committing before writing to a database, assign the following policies to that object’s interface in the Implementation Configuration File:
 
always or optional
Note:
Transaction-bound objects cannot start a transaction or invoke other objects from inside the Tobj_ServantBase::deactivate_object() operation. The only valid invocations transaction-bound objects can make inside deactivate_object() are write operations to the database.
Also, if you have an object that is involved in a transaction, the Server object that manages that object must include invocations to open and close the XA resource manager, even if the object does not write any data to disk. (If you have a transactional object that does not write data to disk, you specify the NULL resource manager.) For more information about opening and closing an XA resource manager, see “Opening an XA Resource Manager” on page 3‑7 and “Closing an XA Resource Manager” on page 3‑8.
User-defined Exceptions
This topic includes the following sections:
About User-defined Exceptions
Including a user-defined exception in an Oracle Tuxedo CORBA client/server application involves the following steps:
1.
2.
3.
For example, the Transactions sample C++ application includes an instance of a user-defined exception, TooManyCredits. This exception is thrown by the server application when the client application tries to register a student for a course, and the student has exceeded the maximum number of courses for which he or she can register. When the client application catches this exception, the client application rolls back the transaction that registers a student for a course. This section explains how you can define and implement user-defined exceptions in your Oracle Tuxedo CORBA client/server application, using the TooManyCredits exception as an example.
Defining the Exception
In the OMG IDL file for your client/server application:
1.
Define the exception and define the data sent with the exception. For example, the TooManyCredits exception is defined to pass a short integer representing the maximum number of credits for which a student can register. Therefore, the definition for the TooManyCredits exception contains the following OMG IDL statements:
exception TooManyCredits
{
unsigned short maximum_credits;
};
2.
NotRegisteredList register_for_courses(
in StudentId student,
in CourseNumberList courses
) raises (
TooManyCredits
);
Throwing the Exception
In the implementation of the operation that uses the exception, write the code that throws the exception, as in the following C++ example.
if ( ... ) {
UniversityZ::TooManyCredits e;
e.maximum_credits = 18;
throw e;
How the Transactions University Sample Application Works
This topic includes the following sections:
About the Transactions University Sample Application
To implement the student registration process, the Transactions sample application does the following:
a.
Begins a transaction by invoking the Current::begin() operation on the TransactionCurrent object.
b.
Invokes the register_for_courses() operation on the Registrar object, passing a list of courses.
The register_for_courses() operation on the Registrar object processes the registration request by executing a loop that does the following iteratively for each course in the list:
a.
b.
The Registrar object checks for the following potential problems, which prevent the transaction from being committed:
As defined in the application’s OMG IDL, the register_for_courses() operation returns a parameter to the client application, NotRegisteredList, which contains a list of the courses for which the registration failed.
If the NotRegisteredList value is empty, the client application commits the transaction.
If the NotRegisteredList value contains any courses, the client application queries the student to indicate whether he or she wants to complete the registration process for the courses for which the registration succeeded. If the user chooses to complete the registration, the client application commits the transaction. If the user chooses to cancel the registration, the client application rolls back the transaction.
If the registration for a course has failed because the student exceeds the maximum number of credits he or she can take, the Registrar object returns a TooManyCredits exception to the client application, and the client application rolls back the entire transaction.
Transactional Model Used by the Transactions University Sample Application
The basic design rationale for the Transactions sample application is to handle course registrations in groups, as opposed to one at a time. This design helps to minimize the number of remote invocations on the Registrar object.
In implementing this design, the Transactions sample application shows one model of the use of transactions, which were described in “Integrating Transactions in an Oracle Tuxedo Client and Server Application” on page 3‑2. The model is as follows:
The client begins a transaction by invoking the begin() operation on the TransactionCurrent object, followed by making an invocation to the register_for_courses() operation on the Registrar object.
The Registrar object registers the student for the courses for which it can, and then returns a list of courses for which the registration process was unsuccessful. The client application can choose to commit the transaction or roll it back. The transaction encapsulates this conversation between the client and the server application.
The register_for_courses() operation performs multiple checks of the University database. If any one of those checks fail, the transaction can be rolled back.
Object State Considerations for the University Server Application
Because the Transactions University sample application is transactional, the University server application generally needs to consider the implications on object state, particularly in the event of a rollback. In cases where there is a rollback, the server application must ensure that all affected objects have their durable state restored to the proper state.
Because the Registrar object is being used for database transactions, a good design choice for this object is to make it transactional (assign the always transaction policy to this object’s interface). If a transaction has not already been scoped when this object is invoked, the Oracle Tuxedo system will start a transaction automatically.
By making the Registrar object automatically transactional, all database write operations performed by this object will always be done within the scope of a transaction, regardless of whether the client application starts one. Since the server application uses an XA resource manager, and since the object is guaranteed to be in a transaction when the object writes to a database, the object does not have any rollback or commit responsibilities because the XA resource manager takes responsibility for these database operations on behalf of the object.
The RegistrarFactory object, however, can be excluded from transactions because this object does not manage data that is used during the course of a transaction. By excluding this object from transactions, you minimize the processing overhead implied by transactions.
Object Policies Defined for the Registrar Object
To make the Registrar object transactional, the ICF file specifies the always transaction policy for the Registrar interface. Therefore, in the Transaction sample application, the ICF file specifies the following object policies for the Registrar interface:
 
Object Policies Defined for the RegistrarFactory Object
To exclude the RegistrarFactory object from transactions, the ICF file specifies the ignore transaction policy for the Registrar interface. Therefore, in the Transaction sample application, the ICF file specifies the following object policies for the RegistrarFactory interface:
 
Using an XA Resource Manager in the Transactions Sample Application
The Transactions sample application uses the Oracle Transaction Manager Server (TMS), which handles object state data automatically. Using any XA resource manager imposes specific requirements on how different objects managed by the server application may read and write data to that database, including the following:
This characteristic of XA resource managers actually makes the design problems associated with handling object state data in the event of a rollback much simpler. Transactional objects can always delegate the commit and rollback responsibilities to the XA resource manager, which greatly simplifies the task of implementing a server application.
Configuration Requirements for the Transactions Sample Application
The University sample applications use an Oracle Transaction Manager Server (TMS). To use the Oracle database, you must include specific Oracle-provided files in the server application build process. For more information about building, configuring, and running the Transactions sample application, see The Transaction Sample Application in the Oracle Tuxedo online documentation. For more information about the configurable settings in the UBBCONFIG file, see “Modifying the UBBCONFIG File to Accommodate Transactions” on page 5‑2.
 

Copyright © 1994, 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.