One scenario is the consumption of an ISV specific interface into a public standard interface.
From the previous libfoo.so.1 example, assume that in Release X+2, the version definition SUNW_1.1 is subdivided into two standard releases, STAND_A and STAND_B. To preserve compatibility, the SUNW_1.1 version definition must be maintained. In this example, this version definition is expressed as inheriting the two standard definitions.
$ pvs -dsv libfoo.so.1
libfoo.so.1:
_end;
_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_;
_DYNAMIC;
_edata;
_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_;
_etext;
SUNW_1.1: {STAND_A, STAND_B}:
SUNW_1.1;
SUNW_1.2: {SUNW_1.1}:
bar;
STAND_A:
foo1;
STAND_A;
STAND_B:
foo2;
STAND_B;
|
If the only requirement of application prog is the interface symbol foo1, the application will have a single dependency on the version definition STAND_A. This precludes running prog on a system where libfoo.so.1 is less than Release X+2. The version definition STAND_A did not exist in previous releases, even though the interface foo1 did.
The application prog can be built to align its requirement with previous releases by creating a dependency on SUNW_1.1.
$ cat mapfile
libfoo.so - SUNW_1.1 $ADDVERS=SUNW_1.1;
$ cat prog
extern void foo1();
main()
{
foo1();
}
$ cc -M mapfile -o prog prog.c -L. -R. -lfoo
$ pvs -r prog
libfoo.so.1 (SUNW_1.1);
|
This explicit dependency is sufficient to encapsulate the true dependency requirements. This dependency satisfies compatibility with older releases.