LCR is the first standard that assesses the short term liquidity challenges of a bank. The two standards - LCR and NSFR, complement each other, are aimed at providing a holistic picture of a bank’s funding risk profile, and aid in better liquidity risk management practices. The LCR as prescribed by the HKMA is required to be reported by all institutions designated as Category 1 by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
Topics:
· HKMA Specific Input - Credit Quality Grade
· Pre-configured Regulatory LCR Scenario
The LRRCHKMA application requires the following inputs for LCR calculation:
· Liquidity haircut for each asset level should be provided through business assumptions, with the assumption category as valuation change, and assumption subcategory as the haircut.
· Scenarios which define the outflow percentage should be defined through appropriate business assumptions. For example, Retail Deposit Runoff is defined through a business assumption with the assumption category as Incremental Cash Flow, and subcategory as Run-off.
· Scenarios which define the inflow percentage should be defined through appropriate business assumptions. For example, Rollover Reverse Repo is defined through a business assumption with the assumption category as Cash Flow Movement, and subcategory as Roll Over.
· Liquidity Horizon is specified as the Runtime execution parameter.
Credit Quality Grade is one of the dimensions used in the LCR Rules and Business Assumptions and is computed per Capital Rules (Cap. 155. sub. leg. L) as issued by the HKMA. The grade is a reclassification of credit quality ratings into a number or a score based on the issuer type, the domicile, the Rating Agency, and so on.
The grade reclassification is done for ratings on Issuer, Guarantor, and Issue (Security).
· For Issuer and Guarantor, only Long term Ratings are considered and reclassified.
· For Security, both Long term and Short term ratings are reclassified. The following table illustrates the logic of reclassification, and displays the credit grade based on long term ratings.
Standard Party Type (of Issuer or Guarantor) |
Issuer Domicile |
S&P Global Rating |
Moody's Investor Service |
Fitch Ratings |
Rating and Investment Information Inc |
Japan Credit Rating Agency Inc |
Credit Analysis and Research ltd |
CRISIL |
ICRA |
Credit Quality Grade (Processing) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sovereign |
|
AAA |
Aaa |
AAA |
AAA |
AAA |
|
|
|
1 |
|
AA+ |
Aa1 |
AA+ |
AA+ |
AA+ |
|
|
|
||
|
AA |
Aa2 |
AA |
AA |
AA |
|
|
|
||
|
AA- |
Aa3 |
AA- |
AA- |
AA- |
|
|
|
||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms |
|
AAA |
Aaa |
AAA |
AAA |
AAA |
|
|
|
|
|
AA+ |
Aa1 |
AA+ |
AA+ |
AA+ |
|
|
|
||
|
AA |
Aa2 |
AA |
AA |
AA |
|
|
|
||
|
AA- |
Aa3 |
AA- |
AA- |
AA- |
|
|
|
||
Corporates |
Other than India |
AAA |
Aaa |
AAA |
AAA |
AAA |
|
|
|
|
AA+ |
Aa1 |
AA+ |
AA+ |
AA+ |
|
|
|
|||
AA |
Aa2 |
AA |
AA |
AA |
|
|
|
|||
AA- |
Aa3 |
AA- |
AA- |
AA- |
|
|
|
|||
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AAA |
CRISIL AAA |
[ICRA] AAA |
||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AAA (Is) |
|
IrAAA |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Sovereign |
|
A+ |
A1 |
A+ |
A+ |
A+ |
|
|
|
2 |
|
A |
A2 |
A |
A |
A |
|
|
|
||
|
A- |
A3 |
A- |
A- |
A- |
|
|
|
||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms |
|
A+ |
A1 |
A+ |
A+ |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
A2 |
A |
A |
A |
|
|
|
||
|
A- |
A3 |
A- |
A- |
A- |
|
|
|
||
Corporates |
Other than India |
A+ |
A1 |
A+ |
A+ |
A+ |
|
|
|
|
A |
A2 |
A |
A |
A |
|
|
|
|||
A- |
A3 |
A- |
A- |
A- |
|
|
|
|||
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA+ |
CRISIL AA+ |
[ICRA]AA+ |
||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA |
CRISIL AA |
[ICRA]AA |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA- |
CRISIL AA- |
[ICRA]AA- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA+(Is) |
|
IrAA+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA(Is) |
|
IrAA |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE AA-(Is) |
|
IrAA- |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Sovereign |
|
BBB+ |
Baa1 |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
|
|
|
3 |
|
BBB |
Baa2 |
BBB |
BBB |
BBB |
|
|
|
||
|
BBB- |
Baa3 |
BBB- |
BBB- |
BBB- |
|
|
|
||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms |
|
BBB+ |
Baa1 |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
BBB |
Baa2 |
BBB |
BBB |
BBB |
|
|
|
||
|
BBB- |
Baa3 |
BBB- |
BBB- |
BBB- |
|
|
|
||
Corporates |
Other than India |
BBB+ |
Baa1 |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
BBB |
Baa2 |
BBB |
BBB |
BBB |
|
|
|
|||
BBB- |
Baa3 |
BBB- |
BBB- |
BBB- |
|
|
|
|||
Corporates |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A+ |
CRISIL A+ |
[ICRA]A+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A |
CRISIL A |
[ICRA]A |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A- |
CRISIL A- |
[ICRA]A- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A+(Is) |
|
IrA+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A(Is) |
|
IrA |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A-(Is) |
|
IrA- |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Sovereign |
|
BB+ |
Ba1 |
BB+ |
BB+ |
BB+ |
|
|
|
4 |
|
BB |
Ba2 |
BB |
BB |
BB |
|
|
|
||
|
BB- |
Ba3 |
BB- |
BB- |
BB- |
|
|
|
||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms |
|
BB+ |
Ba1 |
BB+ |
BB+ |
BB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
BB |
Ba2 |
BB |
BB |
BB |
|
|
|
||
|
BB- |
Ba3 |
BB- |
BB- |
BB- |
|
|
|
||
|
B+ |
B1 |
B+ |
B+ |
B+ |
|
|
|
||
|
B |
B2 |
B |
B |
B |
|
|
|
||
|
B- |
B3 |
B- |
B- |
B- |
|
|
|
||
Corporates |
Other than India |
BB+ |
Ba1 |
BB+ |
BB+ |
BB+ |
|
|
|
|
BB |
Ba2 |
BB |
BB |
BB |
|
|
|
|||
BB- |
Ba3 |
BB- |
BB- |
BB- |
|
|
|
|||
Corporates |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB+ |
CRISIL BBB+ |
[ICRA]BBB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB |
CRISIL BBB |
[ICRA]BBB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB- |
CRISIL BBB- |
[ICRA]BBB- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB+(Is) |
|
IrBBB+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB(Is) |
|
IrBBB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BBB-(Is) |
|
IrBBB- |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Sovereign |
|
B+ |
B1 |
B+ |
B+ |
B+ |
|
|
|
5 |
|
B |
B2 |
B |
B |
B |
|
|
|
||
|
B- |
B3 |
B- |
B- |
B- |
|
|
|
||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms |
|
CCC+ |
Caa1 |
CCC |
CCC+ |
CCC |
|
|
|
|
|
CCC |
Caa2 |
CC |
CCC |
CC |
|
|
|
||
|
CCC- |
Caa3 |
C |
CCC- |
C |
|
|
|
||
|
CC |
Ca |
D |
CC |
D |
|
|
|
||
|
C |
C |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
||
|
D |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
||
Corporates |
Other than India |
B+ |
B1 |
B+ |
B+ |
B+ |
|
|
|
|
B |
B2 |
B |
B |
B |
|
|
|
|||
B- |
B3 |
B- |
B- |
B- |
|
|
|
|||
CCC+ |
Caa1 |
CCC |
CCC+ |
CCC |
|
|
|
|||
CCC |
Caa2 |
CC |
CCC |
CC |
|
|
|
|||
CCC- |
Caa3 |
C |
CCC- |
C |
|
|
|
|||
CC |
Ca |
D |
CC |
D |
|
|
|
|||
C |
C |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|||
D |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|||
Corporates |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB+ |
CRISIL BB+ |
[ICRA] BB+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB |
CRISIL BB |
[ICRA] BB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB- |
CRISIL BB- |
[ICRA] BB- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B+ |
CRISIL B+ |
[ICRA] B+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B |
CRISIL B |
[ICRA] B |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B- |
CRISIL B- |
[ICRA] B- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C+ |
CRISIL C+ |
[ICRA] C+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C |
CRISIL C |
[ICRA] C- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C- |
CRISIL C- |
[ICRA] D |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE D |
CRISIL D |
IrBB+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB+(Is) |
|
IrBB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB(Is) |
|
IrBB- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE BB-(Is) |
|
IrB+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B+ (Is) |
|
IrB |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B (Is) |
|
IrB- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE B-(Is) |
|
IrC+ |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C+ (Is) |
|
IrC |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C(Is) |
|
IrC- |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE C-(Is) |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE D (Is) |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Sovereign |
|
CCC+ |
Caa1 |
CCC |
CCC+ |
CCC |
|
|
|
6 |
|
CCC |
Caa2 |
CC |
CCC |
CC |
|
|
|
||
|
CCC- |
Caa3 |
C |
CCC- |
C |
|
|
|
||
|
CC |
Ca |
D |
CC |
D |
|
|
|
||
|
C |
C |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
||
|
D |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
The following table displays the credit grade based on short term ratings.
Standard Party Type (of Issuer or Guarantor) |
Issuer Domicile |
S&P Global Rating |
Moody's Investor Service |
Fitch Ratings |
Rating and Investment Information Inc |
Japan Credit Rating Agency Inc |
Credit Analysis and Research ltd |
CRISIL |
ICRA |
Credit Quality Grade (Processing) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms, Corporates |
Other than India |
A-1+ |
P-1 |
F-1+ |
a-1+ |
J-1+ |
|
|
|
1s |
A-1 |
|
F-1 |
a-1 |
J-1 |
|
|
|
|||
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A1+ |
CRISIL A1+ |
[ICRA]A1+ |
||
|
|
|||||||||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms, Corporates |
Other than India |
A-2 |
P-2 |
F2 |
a-2 |
J-2 |
|
|
|
2s |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A1 |
CRISIL A1 |
[ICRA]A1 |
||
|
|
|||||||||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms, Corporates |
Other than India |
A-3 |
P-3 |
F3 |
a-3 |
J-3 |
|
|
|
3s |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A2+ |
CRISIL A2+ |
[ICRA]A2+ |
||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A2 |
CRISIL A2 |
[ICRA]A2 |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms, Corporates |
Other than India |
B |
NP |
B |
b |
NJ |
|
|
|
4s |
B-1 |
|
C |
c |
D |
|
|
|
|||
B-2 |
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
B-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A3+ |
CRISIL A3+ |
[ICRA]A3+ |
||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A3 |
CRISIL A3 |
[ICRA]A3 |
|||
|
|
|||||||||
Banks, Financial Institutions, Securities Firms, Corporates |
India |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A4+ |
CRISIL A4+ |
[ICRA]A4+ |
5s |
|
|
|
|
|
CARE A4 |
CRISIL A4 |
[ICRA]A4 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
CARE D |
CRISIL D |
[ICRA]D |
The application supports an out-of-the-box HKMA LCR, which has the regulatory scenario with associated HQLA haircuts, inflow, and outflow percentage/rates preconfigured in the form of rules and business assumptions.
Topics:
· Calculating Stock of High-Quality Liquid Assets
· Classifying Operational Deposits
· Identifying Deposit Stability
· Treating Lien Marked Deposits
· Calculating Contractually Required Collateral
· Calculating Excess Collateral
· Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount
· Calculating Net Derivative Cash Inflows and Outflows
· Calculating Twenty-Four Month Look-back Amount
· Calculating Operational Amount
· Calculating HQLA Transferability Restriction
· Calculating Net Cash Outflows
· Calculating Liquidity Coverage Ratio
High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) are unencumbered high-quality liquid assets, that can be easily sold or used as collaterals to obtain funds at little or no loss of value even under stress scenarios. All assets, whether owned by the bank or received from counterparties as collaterals, that meet the high quality liquid asset criteria specified by Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), are classified by the application as follows:
· Level 1 Assets
· Level 2A Assets
· Level 2B RMBS Assets
· Level 2B Non-RMBS Assets
Level1 assets can be included without limit, and Level 2 assets can only comprise 40% of the stock of HQLA. Of this, Level 2B assets can only comprise 15% of the stock of HQLA. Any asset not classified as an HQLA is considered as an Other Asset.
Topics:
· Identifying and Treating Level 1 Assets
· Identifying and Treating Level 2A Assets
· Identifying and Treating Level 2B RMBS Assets
· Identifying and Treating Level 2B Non-RMBS Assets
The application identifies the following as HQLA Level 1 assets:
· Cash in all currencies, including deposits and reserves at central banks.
· Central bank reserves (including required reserves), to the extent that the central bank policies allow them to be drawn down in times of stress. These include the following:
a. Banks’ overnight deposits with the central bank.
b. Term deposits with the central bank that satisfy the following conditions:
— They are explicitly and contractually repayable on notice from the depositing bank.
— They constitute a loan against which the bank can borrow on a term basis or overnight but automatically renewable basis (only where the bank has an existing deposit with the relevant central bank).
· Marketable debt securities that are issued or guaranteed by a sovereign, central bank, public sector entity, relevant international organization, or multilateral development bank. These securities should also satisfy the following criteria:
a. It qualifies, in the calculation of credit risk under the standardized (credit risk) approach, for 0% risk weight.
b. It is traded in large, deep and active markets, characterized by a low level of concentration, and where debt securities of that type can be monetized through direct sale or repo-style transactions.
c. It has a proven record as a reliable source of liquidity in those markets, even during a period of financial stress.
d. It is not an obligation of a financial institution or an associated entity of a financial institution.
· Marketable debt securities that are issued by the sovereign or central bank of a country and denominated in the local currency of that country, which, under the standardized (credit risk) approach which does not qualify for 0% risk-weight. These securities should also satisfy the following criteria:
a. The Category 1 institution holding the debt security is incorporated in that country, or carries on a banking business, through a branch or subsidiary, in that country.
· Marketable debt securities that are issued by the sovereign or central bank of a country and denominated in a currency that is not the local currency of that country and which do not, under the standardized (credit risk) approach, qualify for 0% risk-weight as laid out in the Capital Rules. These securities should also satisfy the following criteria:
a. It is issued by the sovereign or central bank of a country in which the Category 1 institution holding the debt security is incorporated or carries on a banking business through a branch or subsidiary.
b. The amount of the Category 1 institution’s holding in the debt security that may be eligible for inclusion in the institution’s HQLA does not exceed the amount of total net cash outflows in the currency of the debt security arising from the institution’s banking business in the country in which the debt security is issued.
NOTE:
The process of identifying the value to be included in the stock of HQLA up to the extent of a bank stressed net cash outflows in a particular currency is documented in the Account Country Liquidity Risk Flag section.
Account Country Liquidity Risk Flag:
1. The flag identifies the existence of a bank’s operations in a particular jurisdiction. If the bank holds either liabilities or non-marketable assets in that jurisdiction, the application assumes that the bank has operations in that specific jurisdiction. This is identified in a country and currency combination.
2. The application then identifies whether the asset is held to meet the bank’s net stressed cash outflows in that currency arising from the bank’s operations in that specific jurisdiction by checking the following conditions:
a. Is the issuer’s country is the same as the account country.
b. If the issuer’s country is the same as the country in which local operations are present in a particular jurisdiction as identified in Step 1.
c. If the account currency is the same as the currency in which local operations are present in a particular jurisdiction as identified in Step 1.
If all the criteria are met, the account country's liquidity risk flag is updated as Yes. This indicates that the particular asset is held to meet the net cash outflows in a particular jurisdiction.
3. Finally, the application identifies the amount to be included in the stock of HQLA when the Account Country Liquidity Risk flag = Yes using the following calculation:
Assets classified as HQLA Level 1 which are denominated in HKD are assigned a 0% haircut under the regulatory scenario as prescribed by HKMA. Level 1 securities denominated in other currencies are applied haircuts as follows:
Currency |
Haircut |
---|---|
USD |
2% |
Euro/ JPY/ GBP |
8% |
Others |
10% |
The application identifies the following assets as HQLA Level 2A assets:
1. Marketable securities which satisfy the following conditions:
· Issuer type or guarantor type is one of the following:
§ Sovereign
§ Governments
§ Central Banks
§ Public Sector Entity (PSE)
§ Multi-Lateral Development Bank (MDB)
· Assigned a 20% risk-weight under the standardized Approach of Basel II,
· Not an obligation of a financial institution or any of its affiliated entities.
· Price has not decreased or haircut has not increased by more than 10% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress specified by the bank.
2. Corporate debt securities and covered bonds (including commercial papers), which satisfy the following conditions:
· Issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities.
· Issuer type is not the bank itself for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities (for covered bonds).
· Price has not decreased or haircut has not increased by more than 10% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.
· Has either a long-term credit score of 1, or if the long-term rating is not available, then a short-term credit score of 1.
NOTE:
The credit score is a computed value based on the Credit ratings of the Instrument or Issuer or Guarantor of the securities. This classification process is documented in the Credit Quality Grade section.
Assets classified as HQLA Level 2A are assigned a 15% haircut under the regulatory scenario prescribed by HKMA.
The application identifies the following assets as HQLA Level 2B RMBS assets:
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities which are marketable and satisfy the following criteria:
· Issuer type is not the bank itself for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities (in case of covered bonds).
· Price has not decreased or haircut has not increased by more than 20% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.
· Has an underlying Loan to Value Ratio of less than or equal 80%.
· Has either a long-term credit score of 1, or if the long-term rating is not available, then a short-term credit score of 1.
NOTE:
The credit score is a computed value based on the Credit ratings of the Instrument or Issuer or Guarantor of the securities. This classification process is documented in the Credit Quality Grade section.
Assets classified as HQLA Level 2B RMBS are assigned a 25% haircut under the regulatory scenario prescribed by HKMA.
The application identifies the following assets as HQLA Level 2B Non-RMBS assets:
Marketable securities which satisfy the following conditions:
· Issued by Corporates.
· Not an obligation of a financial institution or any of its affiliated entities.
· Price has not decreased or haircut has not increased by more than 20% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress.
· Has either a long-term credit score of 2, or if the long-term rating is not available, then a short-term credit score of 2.
NOTE:
The credit score is a computed value that is based on Credit ratings of the Instrument or Issuer or Guarantor of the securities. This classification process is documented in Credit Quality Grade.
Assets classified as HQLA Level 2B Non-RMBS are assigned a 50% haircut under the regulatory scenario prescribed by HKMA.
The application identifies whether a bank’s asset or a mitigant received under re-hypothecation rights meets all the operational requirements prescribed by HKMA. If an asset classified as HQLA meets all the relevant operational criteria, it is identified as eligible HQLA and included in the stock of HQLA. The application checks for the following operational criteria:
1. Operational Capability to Monetize HQLA
An asset is considered HQLA only if the bank has demonstrated the operational capability to monetize such an asset, and has periodically monetized such an asset. The application captures this information for each asset as a flag.
2. Unencumbered
The application looks at the encumbrance status and includes only those assets in the stock which are unencumbered. If partially encumbered, then the portion of the asset that is unencumbered is considered as HQLA and included in the stock. If an asset is pledged to the central bank, or a PSE, but is not used, the unused portion of such an asset is included in the stock. The application assigns the usage of a pledged asset in the ascending order of asset quality. The lowest quality collateral is marked as used first.
3. Inclusion and Exclusion of Certain Rehypothecated Assets
Assets received under rehypothecation rights as part of the reverse repo and securities financing transactions are considered as eligible HQLA if they are not rehypothecated. An asset pledged to central banks or PSEs, but not used, is considered eligible HQLA. Any asset that a bank receives under a rehypothecation right is not considered eligible HQLA if the counterparty or beneficial owner of the asset has a contractual right to withdraw the asset at any time within 30 calendar days.
4. Unsegregated Assets
The application includes unsegregated assets, received as collateral under rehypothecation rights, for derivative transactions, in the stock of HQLA. Conversely, it excludes all segregated assets from the stock of HQLA.
5. HQLA Under the Control of the Treasurer
To be considered eligible HQLA, the asset is required to be under the control of the management function of the bank that manages liquidity for example, Treasurer. The application captures this information for each asset as a flag.
6. Termination of Transaction Hedging HQLA
If an HQLA is hedged by a specific transaction, then the application considers the impact of closing out the hedge to liquidate the asset that is, the cost of terminating the hedge while computing the stock of HQLA. The hedge termination cost is deducted from the market value of the asset and the difference is included in the stock of HQLA.
All unencumbered assets classified as Level 1, 2A, or 2B, which meet the HQLA eligibility criteria, are included in the Stock of High-Quality Liquid Assets (SHQLA). The formula for calculating SHQLA is as follows:
The Application applies the relevant liquidity haircuts to the fair value of each eligible HQLA based on the haircuts specified as part of a business assumption. The sum of haircut adjusted market value of all assets which are not ‘other assets’ and which are classified as ‘eligible HQLA’ is considered in the stock of HQLA. The stock includes the bank’s assets which are unencumbered, i.e. not placed as collateral; as well as assets received from counterparties where the bank has a re-hypothecation right and where such assets are not rehypothecated.
NOTE:
All calculations are based on the fair value of assets.
The following steps are involved in computing the stock of HQLA:
Topics:
· Calculating Stock of Liquid Assets
· Identifying Eligible HQLA on Unwind
· Unwinding of Transactions Involving Eligible HQLA
· Calculating SHQLA with and without Adjustments
The process for calculation of stock of liquid assets is as follows.
1. Calculating Stock of Level 1 Assets
The stock of level 1 assets equals the haircut adjusted fair value of all level 1 liquid assets held by the bank as on the calculation date that is eligible HQLA, less the amount of the minimum/mandatory reserves, less hedge termination costs (if any), less withdrawal penalty on time deposits (if any).
2. Calculating Stock of Level 2A Assets
The stock of level 2A liquid assets equals the haircut adjusted fair value of all level 2A liquid assets held by the bank as on the calculation date that are eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).
3. Calculating Stock of Level 2B- RMBS Assets
The stock of level 2B liquid assets equals the haircut adjusted fair value of all level 2B RMBS liquid assets held by the bank as on the calculation date that are eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).
4. Calculating Stock of Level 2B- Non-RMBS Assets
The stock of level 2B Non-RMBS liquid assets equals the haircut adjusted fair value of all level 2B non-RMBS liquid assets held by the bank as on the calculation date that are eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).
The application identifies the assets placed as collateral which are eligible HQLA if they are not encumbered. Placed collateral is marked as eligible HQLA on unwinding if it fulfills all of the following criteria:
· Asset level is level 1, 2A or 2B RMBS/Non-RMBS asset
· Meets HQLA operational requirements on unwind
The application identifies all transactions maturing within the LCR horizon where HQLA is placed or received. These transactions include repos, reverse repos, secured lending transactions, collateral swaps, and so on. Such transactions are unwound; that is, the original position is reversed and the cash or stock of HQLA has adjusted accordingly. This is done to avoid including any asset in the stock that should be returned to its owner before the end of the LCR horizon. The unwinding of transactions results in adjustments to the stock of HQLA, such as additions to or deductions from the stock of HQLA.
The total stock of HQLA is determined as a minimum of two Stocks. The formula for this calculation is as follows:
Operational deposits are those deposits placed by customers with a bank or balances kept by the bank with other financial institutions to meet their payment and settlement needs and other operational requirements. The application classifies accounts as operational if they meet the following criteria:
1. They are held in specifically designated accounts that are held as operational accounts by the customers at the bank.
2. They are priced without giving economic incentives to the customer to leave excess funds in the account.
3. They arise as a result of a clearing, custody, or cash management relationship with the bank.
4. They do not arise out of correspondent banking services or in the context of prime brokerage services.
5. The termination of such agreements requires a minimum notice period of 30 days.
6. If the agreement can be terminated within 30 days, the customer must pay significant switching or termination costs to the bank.
Any excess balances held in an account classified as an operational deposit over and above that which is required to meet the operational needs of the customer is assigned a higher outflow rate by the regulator. The application supports a methodology for computing the portion of the balance held for operational purposes which are truly required to meet the operational needs of the customer. For details see Calculating Operational Amount.
This section provides the steps involved in insurance allocation.
Topics:
· Identifying Insurance Eligible Accounts
· Allocation of Deposit Insurance
The identification of insurance eligible accounts involves looking at the inclusion as well as the exclusion criteria. The application requires users to provide the following inclusion criteria:
· Ownership Category
OFS LRRCHKMA allocates the insurance limit separately for each ownership category level. Ownership categories include single accounts, joint accounts, trusts, and Business accounts. As per the HKMA insurance agency, a separate limit is assigned to a depositor combination based on the ownership category of accounts. Users are required to provide the ownership categories that get a separate limit. The coverage per Legal Entity - Customer-Ownership category combination is HK$ 500,000.
· Product Type
This is a list of product types that are covered under the respective jurisdiction’s deposit insurance scheme. The insurance limit is allocated to only those customer accounts whose product types match those covered by the deposit insurance. For HKMA, deposit Protection Scheme (DPS) covers the following:
§ Current and Savings accounts
§ Term Deposits with contract maturity less than 5 years
The following products are not covered by deposit insurance:
§ Structured Deposits
§ Certificate of Deposit
§ Term Deposits with contract maturity exceeding 5 years
· Product Type Prioritization
While allocating insured amounts from the customer level to customer-account level, priority is given on the following basis:
Basis |
Description |
---|---|
Standard Product Type |
Current Account and Savings accounts = Priority 1; Time deposits = Priority 2. |
Balance |
If the Product types of two or more accounts are the same, the priority is given to account with highest EOP balance. |
Account number |
In the rare case that the product type and balances between accounts are the same, allocate priority to the lowest account number. |
As part of the HKMA Run, the application allocates the deposit insurance to accounts based on the guidelines specified by the DPS. The insurance limit captured against each deposit insurance scheme is allocated to the insurance-eligible accounts under that scheme based on the ownership category and the depositor combination. The customer under consideration should not be an Excluded party. An excluded party is one where the party's deposits are not eligible to be covered under the deposit insurance scheme. As per the Hong Kong Deposit Protection Scheme (DPS), licensed banks, senior management, controllers and directors of the Scheme member and its related companies are not eligible for deposit insurance.
Once the insurance limit is allocated at an account level, the application determines the deposit stability as follows:
1. Stable Deposits
A stable deposit is the portion of a deposit which is covered by deposit insurance provided by an effective deposit insurance scheme or a public guarantee that provides equivalent protection and which satisfies one of the following conditions:
§ It is held in a transactional account by the depositor.
Or
§ The depositor has an established relationship with the reporting legal entity.
The application identifies the existence of an established relationship if the depositor meets one of the following criteria:
§ The depositor holds more than one account with the bank, with at least one account of a type other than a deposit.
Or
§ The bank has assigned a customer relationship manager to the depositor.
If a deposit is partially covered by insurance and meets the other criteria, the insured portion of such deposits is treated as stable while the uninsured portion is treated as less stable. Stable deposits receive a 5% Run-off rate.
2. Less Stable Deposits
All insured and uninsured deposit or funding balances that do not meet the stable deposits criteria are classified as less stable deposits. This includes the following:
§ Uninsured balance of deposits meeting stable deposits criteria.
§ Insured balance of deposits which are not transactional account and the customer has no established relationship with the bank.
§ Deposit balance where the insurance coverage status is Uninsured.
Less stable deposits receive a 10% Run-off rate.
A bank does lien marking of a deposit when the bank’s deposit or deposits is placed as a security against a loan or loans extended by the bank. It indicates that when a customer receives a loan from a bank and contractually places the deposits held within the same bank as collateral, then the bank marks the respective deposits as lien marked deposits.
For lien marked deposits, the deposit proceeds are paid out only when the loan against the deposit is repaid in full. This indicates that the deposit placed against the loan is encumbered for the entire term of the loan until it is repaid. Multiple deposits can be placed against multiple liens, such as loans, line of credit, guarantees, and so on, forming many-to-many relationships.
The outflows for lien marked deposits which will not mature within the LCR horizon may be excluded from LCR calculation if the following conditions are met:
· The loan will not mature or settle in the next 30 days.
· The pledge arrangement is subject to a legally enforceable contract disallowing withdrawal of the deposit before the loan is fully settled or repaid.
· The amount of deposit to be excluded cannot exceed the outstanding balance of the loan.
Topics:
· Identifying Lien Marked Deposits
· Treating Lien Marked Deposits
Lien marked deposits are identified against deposits in the staging area by the Lien Marked Indicator flag. The mapping between deposits which are lien marked and the lien against it is many to many and is a download for the application.
When all the guideline conditions are satisfied, the encumbered portion of lien marked deposits are excluded and receives a 0% factor. The unencumbered portion of the lien marked deposits is included and receives an appropriate run-off rate as applicable.
To cater to lien marked deposits, the following based measures are used in the business assumptions.
· Unencumbered stable balance: This measure populates the portion of a stable amount, which is unencumbered.
· Unencumbered less stable balance: This measure populates the portion of the less stable amount, which is unencumbered.
· Encumbered balance: This measure populates the encumbered amount of the deposit.
SeeRegulations Addressed through Business Assumptions for details of the preseeded assumptions on lien marked deposits.
For Secured Accounts involving collateral placed or collateral received, there is an option to compute balances and cash flows in two granularities:
· Account-level
· Account-collateral level
This option enables the treatment of partially secured accounts and granular processing of an account with multiple collaterals. By default, secured funding computations happen at the account level for partially secured accounts. This can be changed to the Account-collateral level by updating the value of the SETUP_MASTER table entry for SEC_TRANS_TREATMENT_PURPOSE_VAL to YES.
Account-level
By default, all computations are done at the account level. This means that if multiple collaterals are securing an account, the collateral level information will be aggregated and processed at an account level.
Account-collateral level
Collateral level measures, such as the ones at the HQLA Asset level, encumbrance period, and so on, are computed at the account-collateral level. This means that if multiple collaterals are securing an account, the collateral level information is processed at the same account-collateral level without aggregating any data.
Contractually required collateral is the amount of collateral that is contractually due from one party to the other based on the current exposure and collateral position. This amount must be paid to the party soon and results in outflow for the party owing the collateral and inflow to the party to whom the collateral is due. It can be of two types based on the direction of the exposure, Excess Collateral Due or Excess Collateral Receivable.
Topics:
· For Other Assets and Liabilities
This section details the calculation of contractually due collateral and contractually receivable collateral for derivatives.
Topics:
· Calculating Contractually Due Collateral
· Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral
The application computes the value of the collateral that a bank is required to post contractually to its derivative counterparty as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If Secured Indicator is No, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
2. If Secured Indicator is Yes and CSA Type is One way, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
3. If Secured Indicator is Yes, CSA Type is Two way and Gross Exposure is greater than or equal to 0, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
4. If Secured Indicator is Yes, CSA Type is Two way and Gross Exposure is less than 0, the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:
Where,
Threshold is the unsecured exposure that a party to a netting agreement is willing to assume before making collateral calls.
The contractually due collateral is assumed to be posted and therefore receives the relevant outflow rate specified by the regulator as part of the pre-configured business assumptions for LCR calculations.
The application computes the value of the collateral that a derivative counterparty is required to post contractually to the bank as per the below procedure:
1. If Secured Indicator = No, then the contractually receivable collateral is 0. Else,
2. If Secured Indicator = Yes and Gross Exposure is <= 0, then the contractually receivable collateral is 0. Else,
3. If Secured Indicator = Yes and Gross Exposure is >0, then the application computes the contractually receivable collateral as follows:
The contractually receivable collateral does not receive a pre-specified inflow rate from the regulator and is, therefore, excluded from the LCR calculations. However, the application computes this to report.
This section details the calculation of contractually due collateral and contractually receivable collateral for other assets and liabilities.
Topics:
· Calculating Contractually Due Collateral
· Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral
The application calculates contractually due collateral for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
2. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
3. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows
The application calculates contractually receivable collateral for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
2. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
3. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is Y then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:
Excess collateral is the value of collateral posted or received that is more than the collateral required based on the current levels of exposure and collateral position. This amount can be withdrawn by the party which has provided the collateral over its exposure and results in outflow to the party holding the excess collateral and an inflow to the party who has provided the excess collateral. It can be of two types, Excess Collateral Due or Excess Collateral Receivable.
Topics:
· For Other Assets and Liabilities
This section details the calculation of excess collateral due and excess collateral receivable for derivatives.
Topics:
· Calculating Excess Collateral Due
· Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable
The application computes the value of the collateral that a derivative counterparty has posted to the bank, over the contractually required collateral, and therefore can be withdrawn by the counterparty, as follows:
1. If Secured Indicator is No, then the excess collateral due is 0.
2. If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are less than or equal to 0, the application computes the excess collateral due as follows:
Where,
Adjusted collateral received: Collateral received from the counterparty less customer withdrawable collateral
Customer withdrawable collateral: Collateral received under re-hypothecation rights that can be contractually withdrawn by the customer within the LCR horizon without a significant penalty associated with such a withdrawal.
3. If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are greater than 0, the application computes the excess collateral due as follows:
The excess collateral due is assumed to be recalled by the counterparty and therefore receives the relevant outflow rate specified by the regulator as part of the pre-configured business assumptions for LCR calculations.
The application computes the value of the collateral that the bank has posted to its derivative counterparty, over the contractually required collateral, and therefore can be withdrawn by the bank, as follows:
1. If Secured Indicator is No, then the excess collateral receivable is 0.
2. If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are greater than or equal to 0, the application computes the excess collateral receivable as follows:
Where,
Adjusted collateral posted: Collateral posted by the bank less firm withdrawable collateral.
Firm withdrawable collateral: Collateral provided under re-hypothecation rights that can be contractually withdrawn by the bank within the LCR horizon without a significant penalty associated with such a withdrawal.
3. If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are less than 0, the application computes the excess collateral receivable as follows:
The excess collateral receivable does not receive a pre-specified inflow rate from the regulator and is, therefore, excluded from the LCR calculations. However, the application computes this to report.
This section details the calculation of excess collateral due and excess collateral receivable for other assets and liabilities.
Topics
· Calculating Excess Collateral Due
· Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable
The application calculates the excess collateral due for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
2. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
3. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:
The application calculates the excess collateral receivable for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
2. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.
3. If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:
This section details the calculation of downgrade impact amount for derivatives and for other liabilities.
Topics:
· Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Derivatives
· Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Other Liabilities
The application calculates the downgrade impact amount for derivatives as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If a downgrade trigger does not exist for the derivatives contract or netting agreement, the downgrade impact amount is 0.
2. If Net Exposure greater than 0, the downgrade impact amount is 0.
3. If Net Exposure less than or equal to 0, the downgrade impact amount is calculated as follows:
The application calculates the downgrade impact amount for other liabilities, including annuities, that have an associated downgrade, derivatives as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.
1. If a downgrade trigger does not exist for the liability account, the downgrade impact amount is 0.
2. The downgrade impact amount for liabilities other than derivatives and securitizations is calculated as follows:
NOTE:
Any liability account that is triggered due to a particular level of rating downgrade has an outflow corresponding to a pre-specified percentage of the downgrade impact amount. For instance, if a 3-notch downgrade is specified, then the downgrade impact amount will outflow only for those accounts that have a trigger of 1-notch, 2-notches, and 3-notches. If a 2-notch downgrade is specified, then the downgrade impact amount will outflow only for those accounts that have a trigger of 1-notch and 2-notches. The rating downgrade and the outflow percentage as specified by the regulator are part of the pre-configured business assumptions for LCR calculations.
This section details the cash flow netting calculations at the derivative contract level and netting agreement level.
Topics:
· Cash Flow Netting at Derivative Contract Level
· Cash Flow Netting at Netting Agreement Level
Cash flows from each derivative contract are netted as follows:
1. When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in the same currency and occur at the same time bucket:
a. The cash inflows and outflows are summed up and the net value is computed as follows:
b. If the net cash flow is positive and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.
c. If the net cash flow is negative and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.
2. When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in different currencies but settle within the same day:
a. The cash inflows and outflows are summed up after being converted to the reporting currency and the net value is computed.
b. If the net cash flow is positive and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.
c. If the net cash flow is negative and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.
3. When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in different currencies and do not settle within the same day:
a. The cash outflows from each derivative contract without an associated netting agreement are summed up and treated as net derivative cash outflows.
b. The cash inflows from each derivative contract without an associated netting agreement are summed up and treated as net derivative cash inflow.
NOTE:
If a derivative contract has a netting agreement associated with it, the cash flow is further netted across contracts at the netting agreement level.
For derivative contracts which have a netting agreement associated with them, the net cash flows computed at the derivative contract level are further netted across multiple contracts under the same netting agreement as follows:
1. For derivative contracts that belong to a single netting agreement, whose payment netting agreement flag is Yes:
a. The cash inflows and outflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up across all contracts whose payment netting agreement flag is Yes and the net value is computed.
b. If the net cash flow is positive, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.
c. If the net cash flow is negative, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.
2. For derivative contracts that belong to a single netting agreement, whose payment netting agreement flag is No:
a. The cash outflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up separately for each derivative contract whose payment netting agreement flag is No and treated as net derivative cash outflow.
b. The cash inflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up separately for each derivative contract whose payment netting agreement flag is No and treated as net derivative cash inflow.
NOTE:
Cash flow netting for netting agreements is done separately for each currency. Cash flows are not netted across currencies. Instead, the inflows and outflows converted into the reporting currency are summed up separately to report the net derivatives cash inflow and net derivatives cash outflow at an entity level.
The application computes the 24-month look-back amount, to define outflows due to increased liquidity needs related to market valuation changes on derivatives as follows:
· The Mark-to-Market (MTM) value of collateral outflows and inflows due to valuation changes on derivative transactions are captured at a legal entity level. The values over a 24-month historical time window from the As of date are identified.
· The application computes the largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow occurring within each rolling 30-day historical time window as follows:
a. he net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within a particular 30-day historical time window as follows:
b. The cumulative net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within a particular 30-day historical time window as follows:
Where,
i: Each day within a particular 30-day historical time window.
n: Each 30-day historical time window.
c. The absolute net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within the rolling 30-day historical time window as follows:
d. The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow occurring within the rolling 30-day historical time window is identified as follows:
NOTE:
Steps (a) to (b) are repeated for each rolling 30-day historical time window.
e. The 24-month look-back amount is calculated as follows:
NOTE:
1. This calculation is done for each legal entity separately.
2. The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow is computed in 30-day blocks on a rolling basis. For example, the first 30-day block is As of Date to As of Date - 29; the second 30-day block is As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30 and so on.
3. The 24-month look-back amount is computed as the maximum of the largest absolute net collateral flow during all rolling 30-day periods in every 24 months.
The 24-month look-back calculations are illustrated in the following table, considering a 34-day historical time window instead of 24-months. This results in 5 rolling 30-day windows.
Rolling 30-Day Period |
Day |
Market To Market Outflows Due To Derivative Transaction Valuation Changes (a) |
Market To Market Collateral Inflows Due To Derivative Transaction Valuation Changes (b) |
Net Market To Market Collateral Change (c = a - b) |
Cumulative Net Market To Market Collateral Change (d = Cumulative c) |
Absolute Net Market To Market Collateral Change [e = Abs (d)] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As of Date to As of Date - 29 |
As of Date |
65 |
14 |
51 |
51 |
51 |
As of Date - 1 |
65 |
9 |
56 |
107 |
107 |
|
As of Date - 2 |
74 |
83 |
-9 |
98 |
98 |
|
As of Date - 3 |
71 |
97 |
-26 |
72 |
72 |
|
As of Date - 4 |
84 |
89 |
-5 |
67 |
67 |
|
As of Date - 5 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
18 |
18 |
|
As of Date - 6 |
40 |
59 |
-19 |
-1 |
1 |
|
As of Date - 7 |
42 |
87 |
-45 |
-46 |
46 |
|
As of Date - 8 |
100 |
6 |
94 |
48 |
48 |
|
As of Date - 9 |
41 |
30 |
11 |
59 |
59 |
|
As of Date - 10 |
45 |
9 |
36 |
95 |
95 |
|
As of Date - 11 |
9 |
32 |
-23 |
72 |
72 |
|
As of Date - 12 |
59 |
67 |
-8 |
64 |
64 |
|
As of Date - 13 |
61 |
10 |
51 |
115 |
115 |
|
As of Date - 14 |
22 |
36 |
-14 |
101 |
101 |
|
As of Date - 15 |
63 |
81 |
-18 |
83 |
83 |
|
As of Date - 16 |
36 |
3 |
33 |
116 |
116 |
|
As of Date - 17 |
61 |
22 |
39 |
155 |
155 |
|
As of Date - 18 |
94 |
37 |
57 |
212 |
212 |
|
As of Date - 19 |
3 |
18 |
-15 |
197 |
197 |
|
As of Date - 20 |
13 |
27 |
-14 |
183 |
183 |
|
As of Date - 21 |
24 |
56 |
-32 |
151 |
151 |
|
As of Date - 22 |
57 |
75 |
-18 |
133 |
133 |
|
As of Date - 23 |
66 |
87 |
-21 |
112 |
112 |
|
As of Date - 24 |
33 |
71 |
-38 |
74 |
74 |
|
As of Date - 25 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
73 |
73 |
|
As of Date - 26 |
64 |
25 |
39 |
112 |
112 |
|
As of Date - 27 |
54 |
39 |
15 |
127 |
127 |
|
As of Date - 28 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
172 |
172 |
|
As of Date - 29 |
35 |
31 |
4 |
176 |
176 |
|
As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30 |
As of Date - 1 |
65 |
9 |
56 |
56 |
56 |
As of Date - 2 |
74 |
83 |
-9 |
47 |
47 |
|
As of Date - 3 |
71 |
97 |
-26 |
21 |
21 |
|
As of Date - 4 |
84 |
89 |
-5 |
16 |
16 |
|
As of Date - 5 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
-33 |
33 |
|
As of Date - 6 |
40 |
59 |
-19 |
-52 |
52 |
|
As of Date - 7 |
42 |
87 |
-45 |
-97 |
97 |
|
As of Date - 8 |
100 |
6 |
94 |
-3 |
3 |
|
As of Date - 9 |
41 |
30 |
11 |
8 |
8 |
|
As of Date - 10 |
45 |
9 |
36 |
44 |
44 |
|
As of Date - 11 |
9 |
32 |
-23 |
21 |
21 |
|
As of Date - 12 |
59 |
67 |
-8 |
13 |
13 |
|
As of Date - 13 |
61 |
10 |
51 |
64 |
64 |
|
As of Date - 14 |
22 |
36 |
-14 |
50 |
50 |
|
As of Date - 15 |
63 |
81 |
-18 |
32 |
32 |
|
As of Date - 16 |
36 |
3 |
33 |
65 |
65 |
|
As of Date - 17 |
61 |
22 |
39 |
104 |
104 |
|
As of Date - 18 |
94 |
37 |
57 |
161 |
161 |
|
As of Date - 19 |
3 |
18 |
-15 |
146 |
146 |
|
As of Date - 20 |
13 |
27 |
-14 |
132 |
132 |
|
As of Date - 21 |
24 |
56 |
-32 |
100 |
100 |
|
As of Date - 22 |
57 |
75 |
-18 |
82 |
82 |
|
As of Date - 23 |
66 |
87 |
-21 |
61 |
61 |
|
As of Date - 24 |
33 |
71 |
-38 |
23 |
23 |
|
As of Date - 25 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
22 |
22 |
|
As of Date - 26 |
64 |
25 |
39 |
61 |
61 |
|
As of Date - 27 |
54 |
39 |
15 |
76 |
76 |
|
As of Date - 28 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
121 |
121 |
|
As of Date - 29 |
35 |
31 |
4 |
125 |
125 |
|
As of Date - 30 |
93 |
68 |
25 |
150 |
150 |
|
As of Date - 2 to As of Date - 31 |
As of Date - 2 |
74 |
83 |
-9 |
-9 |
9 |
As of Date - 3 |
71 |
97 |
-26 |
-35 |
35 |
|
As of Date - 4 |
84 |
89 |
-5 |
-40 |
40 |
|
As of Date - 5 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
-89 |
89 |
|
As of Date - 6 |
40 |
59 |
-19 |
-108 |
108 |
|
As of Date - 7 |
42 |
87 |
-45 |
-153 |
153 |
|
As of Date - 8 |
100 |
6 |
94 |
-59 |
59 |
|
As of Date - 9 |
41 |
30 |
11 |
-48 |
48 |
|
As of Date - 10 |
45 |
9 |
36 |
-12 |
12 |
|
As of Date - 11 |
9 |
32 |
-23 |
-35 |
35 |
|
As of Date - 12 |
59 |
67 |
-8 |
-43 |
43 |
|
As of Date - 13 |
61 |
10 |
51 |
8 |
8 |
|
As of Date - 14 |
22 |
36 |
-14 |
-6 |
6 |
|
As of Date - 15 |
63 |
81 |
-18 |
-24 |
24 |
|
As of Date - 16 |
36 |
3 |
33 |
9 |
9 |
|
As of Date - 17 |
61 |
22 |
39 |
48 |
48 |
|
As of Date - 18 |
94 |
37 |
57 |
105 |
105 |
|
As of Date - 19 |
3 |
18 |
-15 |
90 |
90 |
|
As of Date - 20 |
13 |
27 |
-14 |
76 |
76 |
|
As of Date - 21 |
24 |
56 |
-32 |
44 |
44 |
|
As of Date - 22 |
57 |
75 |
-18 |
26 |
26 |
|
As of Date - 23 |
66 |
87 |
-21 |
5 |
5 |
|
As of Date - 24 |
33 |
71 |
-38 |
-33 |
33 |
|
As of Date - 25 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
-34 |
34 |
|
As of Date - 26 |
64 |
25 |
39 |
5 |
5 |
|
As of Date - 27 |
54 |
39 |
15 |
20 |
20 |
|
As of Date - 28 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
65 |
65 |
|
As of Date - 29 |
35 |
31 |
4 |
69 |
69 |
|
As of Date - 30 |
93 |
68 |
25 |
94 |
94 |
|
As of Date - 31 |
51 |
97 |
-46 |
48 |
48 |
|
As of Date - 3 to As of Date - 32 |
As of Date - 3 |
71 |
97 |
-26 |
-26 |
26 |
As of Date - 4 |
84 |
89 |
-5 |
-31 |
31 |
|
As of Date - 5 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
-80 |
80 |
|
As of Date - 6 |
40 |
59 |
-19 |
-99 |
99 |
|
As of Date - 7 |
42 |
87 |
-45 |
-144 |
144 |
|
As of Date - 8 |
100 |
6 |
94 |
-50 |
50 |
|
As of Date - 9 |
41 |
30 |
11 |
-39 |
39 |
|
As of Date - 10 |
45 |
9 |
36 |
-3 |
3 |
|
As of Date - 11 |
9 |
32 |
-23 |
-26 |
26 |
|
As of Date - 12 |
59 |
67 |
-8 |
-34 |
34 |
|
As of Date - 13 |
61 |
10 |
51 |
17 |
17 |
|
As of Date - 14 |
22 |
36 |
-14 |
3 |
3 |
|
As of Date - 15 |
63 |
81 |
-18 |
-15 |
15 |
|
As of Date - 16 |
36 |
3 |
33 |
18 |
18 |
|
As of Date - 17 |
61 |
22 |
39 |
57 |
57 |
|
As of Date - 18 |
94 |
37 |
57 |
114 |
114 |
|
As of Date - 19 |
3 |
18 |
-15 |
99 |
99 |
|
As of Date - 20 |
13 |
27 |
-14 |
85 |
85 |
|
As of Date - 21 |
24 |
56 |
-32 |
53 |
53 |
|
As of Date - 22 |
57 |
75 |
-18 |
35 |
35 |
|
As of Date - 23 |
66 |
87 |
-21 |
14 |
14 |
|
As of Date - 24 |
33 |
71 |
-38 |
-24 |
24 |
|
As of Date - 25 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
-25 |
25 |
|
As of Date - 26 |
64 |
25 |
39 |
14 |
14 |
|
As of Date - 27 |
54 |
39 |
15 |
29 |
29 |
|
As of Date - 28 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
74 |
74 |
|
As of Date - 29 |
35 |
31 |
4 |
78 |
78 |
|
As of Date - 30 |
93 |
68 |
25 |
103 |
103 |
|
As of Date - 31 |
51 |
97 |
-46 |
57 |
57 |
|
As of Date - 32 |
12 |
31 |
-19 |
38 |
38 |
|
As of Date - 4 to As of Date - 33 |
As of Date - 4 |
84 |
89 |
-5 |
-5 |
5 |
As of Date - 5 |
8 |
57 |
-49 |
-54 |
54 |
|
As of Date - 6 |
40 |
59 |
-19 |
-73 |
73 |
|
As of Date - 7 |
42 |
87 |
-45 |
-118 |
118 |
|
As of Date - 8 |
100 |
6 |
94 |
-24 |
24 |
|
As of Date - 9 |
41 |
30 |
11 |
-13 |
13 |
|
As of Date - 10 |
45 |
9 |
36 |
23 |
23 |
|
As of Date - 11 |
9 |
32 |
-23 |
0 |
0 |
|
As of Date - 12 |
59 |
67 |
-8 |
-8 |
8 |
|
As of Date - 13 |
61 |
10 |
51 |
43 |
43 |
|
As of Date - 14 |
22 |
36 |
-14 |
29 |
29 |
|
As of Date - 15 |
63 |
81 |
-18 |
11 |
11 |
|
As of Date - 16 |
36 |
3 |
33 |
44 |
44 |
|
As of Date - 17 |
61 |
22 |
39 |
83 |
83 |
|
As of Date - 18 |
94 |
37 |
57 |
140 |
140 |
|
As of Date - 19 |
3 |
18 |
-15 |
125 |
125 |
|
As of Date - 20 |
13 |
27 |
-14 |
111 |
111 |
|
As of Date - 21 |
24 |
56 |
-32 |
79 |
79 |
|
As of Date - 22 |
57 |
75 |
-18 |
61 |
61 |
|
As of Date - 23 |
66 |
87 |
-21 |
40 |
40 |
|
As of Date - 24 |
33 |
71 |
-38 |
2 |
2 |
|
As of Date - 25 |
29 |
30 |
-1 |
1 |
1 |
|
As of Date - 26 |
64 |
25 |
39 |
40 |
40 |
|
As of Date - 27 |
54 |
39 |
15 |
55 |
55 |
|
As of Date - 28 |
51 |
6 |
45 |
100 |
100 |
|
As of Date - 29 |
35 |
31 |
4 |
104 |
104 |
|
As of Date - 30 |
93 |
68 |
25 |
129 |
129 |
|
As of Date - 31 |
51 |
97 |
-46 |
83 |
83 |
|
As of Date - 32 |
12 |
31 |
-19 |
64 |
64 |
|
As of Date - 33 |
34 |
36 |
-2 |
62 |
62 |
The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow for each rolling 30-day period and the 24-month look-back value (in this example, the 34-day look-back value) is computed as follows.
Rolling 30-Day Period |
Largest 30-Day Absolute Net Collateral Flow [f = Max (e)] |
24 Month Look-back Value [Max (f)] |
---|---|---|
As of Date to As of Date - 29 |
212 |
212 |
As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30 |
161 |
|
As of Date - 2 to As of Date - 31 |
153 |
|
As of Date - 3 to As of Date - 32 |
144 |
|
As of Date - 4 to As of Date - 33 |
140 |
The regulator-prescribed lower outflow rate for operational deposits should be applied only to the portion of the EOP balance that is truly held to meet operational needs. The application supports a new methodology to compute the operational portion of the EOP balance of operational deposits. The following steps are involved in computing the operational balance:
1. All deposits classified as operational as per regulatory guidelines are identified. This is a separate process in LRM.
2. The EOP balances of eligible operational accounts are obtained over a 90-day historical window including the As of Date, for example As of Date - 89 days. To identify historical observations, the f_reporting_flag must be updated as Y for one execution of the Run per day in the LRM Run Management Execution Summary UI. The application looks up the balance for such accounts against the Run execution for which the Reporting Flag is updated as Y for each day in the past.
NOTE:
The historical time window is captured as a parameter in the SETUP_MASTER table. The default value is 90 days which can be modified by the user. To modify this value, update the value under the component code DAYS_HIST_OPER_BAL_CALC_UPD .
3. A rolling 5-day average is calculated for each account over the historical window.
4. The average of the 5-day rolling averages computed in Step 3 is calculated.
5. The operational balance is calculated as follows:
NOTE:
The calculation of the operational balance can be either a direct download from the staging tables or through the historical balance approach.
NOTE:
The operational balance calculation based on historical lookback is optional. You can choose to compute the operational balances using this method or provide the value as a download. To provide the value as a download, update the value in the SETUP_MASTER table under the component code HIST_OPERATIONAL_BAL_CALC_UPD as N. If the value is Y, then the value would be calculated through historical balance approach.
6. The non-operational balance is calculated as follows:
7. The operational insured balance is calculated as follows:
The insured and uninsured balances are calculated as part of a separate process, for example the insurance allocation process, which is explained in detail in the relevant section under each jurisdiction.
8. The operational uninsured balance is calculated as follows:
9. The non-operational insured balance is calculated as follows:
10. The non-operational uninsured balance is calculated as follows:
The operational deposit computation process is illustrated in the following table, assuming a 15-day historical window instead of 90-days and for the as of date 28th February 2017. The historical balances for 15-days including the as of date are provided as follows.
Clients With Operational Accounts |
Eligible Operational Accounts |
Historical Time Window |
As of Date |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2/14/2017 |
2/15/2017 |
2/16/2017 |
2/17/2017 |
2/18/2017 |
2/19/2017 |
2/20/2017 |
2/21/2017 |
2/22/2017 |
2/23/2017 |
2/24/2017 |
2/25/2017 |
2/26/2017 |
2/27/2017 |
2/28/2017 |
||
A |
10001 |
102,000 |
102,125 |
102,250 |
102,375 |
102,500 |
102,625 |
102,750 |
102,875 |
103,000 |
103,125 |
103,250 |
103,375 |
103,500 |
103,625 |
103,750 |
10296 |
23,500 |
23,550 |
23,600 |
23,650 |
23,700 |
23,750 |
23,800 |
23,850 |
23,900 |
23,950 |
24,000 |
24,050 |
24,100 |
24,150 |
24,200 |
|
B |
31652 |
65,877 |
59,259 |
59,234 |
59,209 |
59,184 |
59,159 |
59,134 |
59,109 |
59,084 |
59,059 |
59,034 |
59,009 |
58,984 |
58,959 |
58,934 |
The rolling averages and cumulative average are computed as follows:
Clients with Operational Accounts |
Eligible Operational Accounts |
5-day Rolling Average |
Cumulative Average (a) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2/18/2017 |
2/19/2017 |
2/20/2017 |
2/21/2017 |
2/22/2017 |
2/23/2017 |
2/24/2017 |
2/25/2017 |
2/26/2017 |
2/27/2017 |
2/28/2017 |
|||
A |
10001 |
102,250 |
102,375 |
102,500 |
102,625 |
102,750 |
102,875 |
103,000 |
103,125 |
103,250 |
103,375 |
103,500 |
95136 |
|
10296 |
23,600 |
23,650 |
23,700 |
23,750 |
23,800 |
23,850 |
23,900 |
23,950 |
24,000 |
24,050 |
24,100 |
22721 |
B |
31652 |
60,553 |
59,209 |
59,184 |
59,159 |
59,134 |
59,109 |
59,084 |
59,059 |
59,034 |
59,009 |
58,984 |
56931 |
The operational and non-operational balances are computed as follows:
Clients with Operational Accounts |
Eligible Operational Accounts |
Current Balance (b) |
Operational Balance (c = a - b) |
Non-Operational Balance |
Insured Balance |
Uninsured Balance |
Insured Operational Balance |
Uninsured Operational Balance |
Insured Non-Operational Balance |
Uninsured Non-Operational Balance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A |
10001 |
103,750 |
95,136 |
8,615 |
100,000 |
3,750 |
95,136 |
|
4,865 |
3,750 |
10296 |
24,200 |
22,721 |
1,480 |
|
24,200 |
|
22,721 |
|
1,480 |
|
B |
31652 |
58,934 |
56,931 |
2,003 |
58,934 |
|
56,931 |
|
2,003 |
|
NOTE:
· Negative historical balances are replaced by zero for this computation.
· For operational accounts that have an account start date >= historical days including the as of date, missing balances are replaced by previously available balance.
· For operational accounts that have an account start date < historical days including the as of date:
1. Missing balances between the account start date and as of date are replaced by previously available balance.
2. The rolling average is calculated only for the period from the account start date to the as of date.
· The methodology to compute operational balance is optional. This can be turned On or Off using the SETUP_MASTER table, where component code = HIST_OPERATIONAL_BAL_CALC_UPD. The option to provide the operational balance as a download is supported by the application.
Regulators across jurisdictions recognize the existence of liquidity transfer restrictions, for banks that operate in multiple jurisdictions. Such transfer restrictions have implications for the group-wide consolidated LCR calculations and must be treated appropriately. In the LCR consolidation process, OFS LRS includes the restricted HQLA from a subsidiary in the consolidated stock of HQLA only to the extent of that subsidiary’s liquidity needs, such as its net cash outflow, per the regulatory requirements. The treatment of transferability restriction during consolidation is as follows:
1. The net cash outflows are computed for a subsidiary, on a consolidated basis. The consolidation entity is the subsidiary itself in this case. If the subsidiary is a leaf level entity, then the net cash outflow is calculated on a standalone basis.
2. The restricted and unrestricted stock of level 1, level 2A and level 2B is computed for the subsidiary on a consolidated basis. The flag F_TRANSFERABILITY_RESTRICTION will be derived as part of processing, based on the account country and currency.
3. The application checks whether the stock of restricted level 1 assets is greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted level 1 assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1. If no, the entire stock of restricted level 1 assets is included in the consolidated calculations.
4. The application checks whether the stock of restricted level 1 + level 2A assets is greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted level 2A assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1 less stock of restricted level 1 asset. If no, the entire stock of restricted level 2A assets is included in the consolidated calculations.
5. The application checks whether the stock of restricted level 1 + level 2A + level 2B assets is greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted level 2B assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1 less stock of restricted level 1 + level 2A assets. If no, the entire stock of restricted level 2B assets is included in the consolidated calculations.
6. The unrestricted level 1, 2A, and 2B assets are included fully in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA.
7. Steps 1 to 6 are repeated for each sub-consolidation level within the organization structure of the consolidation entity until the consolidation entity itself.
NOTE:
1. The allocation of restricted assets is done in descending order of asset quality to maximize the stock of HQLA.
2. This calculation is part of the LCR consolidation process. For a complete view of the process, see Consolidation, where the consolidation process is described.
The net cash outflows are computed after applying the scenario specified by the user, as a set of business assumptions, to the contractual cash flows. The process of computing the net cash outflows is as follows:
1. Calculating Total Cash Inflows
The application applies the business assumptions, specified on products involving cash inflows, selected as part of the Run. The regulatory assumptions specified in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions section are predefined and packaged as part of the out-of-the-box Run to determine the inflows over the liquidity horizon. The business assumption adjusted cash inflows occurring over the liquidity horizon are summed up to obtain the total cash inflow. These include inflows from earning assets such as loans, assets that are not eligible for inclusion in the stock of HQLA, derivatives inflows, and so on.
2. Calculating Total Cash Outflows
The application applies the business assumptions, specified on products involving cash outflows, selected as part of the Run. The regulatory assumptions specified in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions section are predefined and packaged as part of the out-of-the-box Run to determine the outflows over the liquidity horizon. The business assumption adjusted cash outflows occurring over the liquidity horizon is summed up to obtain the total cash outflow. These include outflows from liabilities, derivatives outflows, outflows due to changes in financial conditions such as rating downgrade and valuation changes, and so on.
3. Calculating Net Cash Outflow
The total net cash outflows are defined as the total expected cash outflows minus total expected cash inflows for the LCR horizon, for example, the subsequent 30 calendar days. Total expected cash outflows are calculated by multiplying the outstanding balances of various categories or types of liabilities and off-balance sheet commitments by the rates at which they are expected to run off or be drawn down. Total expected cash inflows are calculated by multiplying the outstanding balances of various categories of contractual receivables by the rates at which they are expected to flow in up to an aggregate cap of 75% of total expected cash outflows. This requires that a bank must maintain a minimum amount of stock of HQLA equal to 25% of the total cash outflows.
Net cash outflow is computed as follows:
Banks will not be permitted to double count items. For example, if an asset is included as part of the “stock of HQLA” (like the numerator), the associated cash inflows cannot also be counted as cash inflows (part of the denominator). Where an item could be counted in multiple outflow categories, (such as, committed liquidity facilities granted to cover debt maturing within the 30 calendar day period), a bank should assume only up to the maximum contractual outflow for that product.
NOTE:
The inflow and outflow rates as prescribed by HKMA for computing LCR are within the application and ready to be used. Users are also allowed to define bank-specific inflow and outflow rates and apply them to the contractual cash flows to view the stock of HQLA, net cash outflows, and LCR across multiple scenarios.
The approach to consolidation as per LCR approach followed by OFS LRRCHKMA is as follows:
a. Identification and Treatment of Unconsolidated Subsidiary
The application assesses whether a subsidiary is to be consolidated or not by checking the regulatory consolidated flag F_REGULATORY_ENTITY_IND against each legal entity. The application consolidates the cash inflows and outflows of a subsidiary and computes the consolidated LCR, only if the subsidiary is a regulatory consolidated subsidiary. If the entity is an unconsolidated subsidiary, the cash inflows and outflows from the operations of such subsidiaries are ignored (unless otherwise specifically included in the denominator of LCR per regulations) and only the equity investment in such subsidiaries is considered as the bank’s asset and appropriately taken into the numerator or denominator based on the asset level classification.
For instance, legal entity 1 has 3 subsidiaries, legal entity 2, legal entity 3, and legal entity 4. The regulatory consolidated flag F_REGULATORY_ENTITY_IND for legal entity 4 is ‘No’. In this case, legal entity 4 is treated as a third party for consolidation and its assets and cash flows are completely excluded from calculations. Legal entity 1’s interest in legal entity 4 including common equity of legal entity 4 and assets and liabilities where legal entity 4 is the counterparty will not be eliminated as legal entity 4 is considered a third-party during consolidation.
b. HQLA Consolidation by Subsidiary Type
The process of consolidating HQLA differs slightly based on whether the subsidiary is a material entity that is expected to report LCR separately from the parent or not. This is done to ensure consistency in the results when consolidating at a parent level and when calculating the LCR at the material subsidiary level as well. The methods followed for consolidating HQLA are:
i. For material subsidiaries subject to individual LCR requirements, consolidation is done as follows:
— The application identifies whether the subsidiary is a consolidated subsidiary.
— If condition (a) is fulfilled, it identifies whether the consolidated subsidiary is subject to LCR requirement that is, whether the subsidiary in question is a regulated entity.
— If condition (b) is fulfilled, then it calculates the net cash outflow by eliminating all the inter-branch transactions at each country level of the consolidated subsidiary. If the consolidated subsidiary has operations in three countries, then the transactions between all the branches in the same country are eliminated. The application consolidates post-haircut restricted HQLA to the extent of the consolidated subsidiary’s net cash outflow that is, to the extent required to satisfy minimum LCR requirements of that subsidiary as part of the covered company’s HQLA. Restricted HQLA are the assets that have a restriction on their transferability to the parent entity, or are the assets that are denominated in non-convertible currencies.
— It consolidates the entire amount of post-haircut unrestricted HQLA held at the consolidated subsidiary as part of the covered company’s HQLA.
— It consolidates all cash inflows and outflows which are part of the net cash flow calculation.
ii. For subsidiaries not subject to individual LCR requirements, consolidation is done as follows:
— The application identifies whether the subsidiary is a consolidated subsidiary.
— If condition (a) is fulfilled, it identifies whether the consolidated subsidiary is subject to minimum LCR requirement that is, whether the subsidiary in question is a regulated entity.
— If condition (b) is not fulfilled, it eliminates all inter-company transactions until the level of the immediate parent of the consolidated subsidiary and then calculates the net cash outflow.
— The application consolidates post-haircut restricted HQLA to the extent of the consolidated subsidiary’s net cash outflow and the entire amount of post-haircut unrestricted HQLA as part of the covered company’s HQLA.
— It consolidates all cash inflows and outflows which are part of the net cash flow calculation.
c. Consolidated LCR Calculation
Consolidation is done on a step-by-step basis based on each level of the organization structure, starting from the most granular level. This indicates that intercompany transactions are eliminated at each sub-consolidation level till the final level of the consolidation (generally BHC) is reached. The consolidated HQLA calculated at the level of the immediate subsidiary of the BHC is added to the HQLA held by the BHC. All intercompany cash flows are eliminated and the LCR is calculated per the LCR approach.
For instance, a bank’s organizational structure is as follows.
Figure 1: Organization Structure
In this case, at the first level of consolidation, calculation of net cash outflows and HQLA is done on a solo basis for legal entities 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 as they do not have any subsidiaries. For regulated entities, such as material entities, intercompany transactions are not eliminated; whereas for non-regulated entities, intercompany transactions are eliminated to the next level of consolidation that is, legal entities 3 and 5. The restricted HQLA from entities 6 and 7 are consolidated to the extent of their net cash outflows, while the unrestricted HQLA is transferred fully to legal entity 3. The cash inflows and outflows are consolidated to the full extent.
At the second level of consolidation that is, legal entity 3, intercompany transactions are eliminated till legal entity 1, if LE 3 is a non-regulated entity. The HQLA is calculated as a sum of the consolidated restricted and unrestricted HQLA of entities 6 and 7 and the HQLA of legal entity 3. The net cash outflow is calculated based on the cash flows of entities 3, 6, and 7, post-elimination of intercompany transactions if applicable. The consolidated HQLA is calculated based on the procedure detailed in Step 2.
This process continues in a step-by-step manner till the highest parent level, which is the bank holding company in this example.
The liquidity coverage ratio is calculated for a legal entity on both solo and consolidated basis. The formula for calculating the liquidity coverage ratio is as follows:
The liquidity coverage ratio is also calculated for each legal entity at the level of each significant currency to identify potential currency mismatches. This is done by first identifying significant currencies for a legal entity, at a solo or consolidated level as specified in the Run, as follows:
According to the HKMA announcement, significant currency indicates aggregate of liabilities denominated in that currency amount including off-market balance sheet, foreign exchange forward and cross-currency swap to 5% or more of the bank’s total liabilities.
The application further computes and reports the stock of HQLA, net cash outflows, and LCR for each currency identified as significant in the manner detailed in the earlier sections. This calculation is done on both a solo and consolidated basis.
OFS LRRCHKMA supports an out-of-the-box HKMA LCR which has the regulatory scenario with associated HQLA haircuts, inflow, and outflow percentage/rates preconfigured in the form of business assumptions. This section explains the business assumptions and the corresponding regulatory reference.
NOTE:
This section provides only contextual information about the business assumptions. For more detailed information, see the OFS LRS application (UI). For detailed processes and tasks, see the Run Chart.
The following table lists the Document Identifiers provided in the Regulatory Reference column of the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions and Regulations Addressed through Business Rules sections.
Regulation Reference Number |
Document Name |
Issued Date |
---|---|---|
Cap. 155 sub. leg. Q |
Banking (Liquidity) Rules |
January 2018 |
BCBS 238 |
Basel III: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio and liquidity risk monitoring tools |
January 2013 |
The list of preconfigured Business Rules, assumptions and the corresponding reference to the regulatory requirement that it addresses are provided in the tables listed in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions and Regulations Addressed through Business Rules sections.
The Regulatory Reference column for each rule or assumption has reference to the name of the Document Identifiers such as MC and should be read in conjunction with the Document Identifier listed in the preceding table.
Topics:
· Regulation Addressed through Business Assumptions
· Regulation
Addressed through Business Rules
The application supports multiple assumptions with pre-configured rules and scenarios based on regulator specified scenario parameters such as HQLA haircuts, inflow and outflow percentage/rates, and so on. The list of pre-configured business assumptions and the corresponding reference to the regulatory requirement that it addresses is provided in the following table.
Sl. No. |
Business Assumption Name |
Business Assumption Description |
Regulatory Requirement Addressed |
Regulatory Reference 1. HKMA Banking (Liquidity) Rules Capital
155 Sub leg Q |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
HKMA - HQLA Haircuts |
Definition of haircuts for Level 1 assets held in HKD, USD, Euro, JPY, and GBP and Level 2 assets held in all currencies. |
The haircuts on high-quality liquid assets are predefined as part of these assumptions. This assumption applies a 0% haircut on level 1 HKD denominated assets, 15% on level 2A assets, 25% on level 2B RMBS assets, and 50% on level 2B non-RMBS assets. |
Schedule 4A- Table 1, Table 2 |
2 |
HKMA-HQLA Level 1 Haircuts for other currencies |
Definition of haircuts for Level 1 assets held in currencies other than HKD, USD, Euro, JPY, and GBP. |
||
3 |
HKMA-Secured Lending Inflows |
Inflows from secured lending transactions excluding collateral swaps. |
The inflow rates on the secured lending, excluding collateral swaps, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory inflows to secured lending transactions based on the asset level of the collateral received in the form of rollover rates, that is, 1 - run-off rates. A 0% inflow rate is applied to assets used for covering short positions. |
BCBS 238- Para 145- 146HKMA LCR Return template- 1,2 and 3 |
4 |
HKMA-Collateral Swap Inflows |
Inflows from collateral swap transactions. |
The inflow rates on collateral swaps are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the inflows applicable to the market value of placed collateral, when the collateral placed under a swap transaction is of a higher quality than the collateral received, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the placed and received collateral. A 0% inflow rate is applied when the underlying asset received is used for covering short positions. |
|
5 |
HKMA-Drawdowns on Committed Funding Facilities |
Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to banks. |
The inflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down, on the committed credit and liquidity facilities received by the bank, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow rate on the credit and liquidity lines received by the bank. |
HKMA LCR Return
template- 7 |
6 |
HKMA-Other Inflows from Retail Counterparties |
This assumption rollovers 50 percent of cash flows for principal cash type of fully performing loans and leases. |
The inflow rate on the fully performing loans with a stated maturity, extended to retail customers and SMEs who are treated like retail customers for the purposes of LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 50% rollover, that is, 50% inflow on performing retail loans. |
BCBS 238 Para
150 to 151, 153 |
7 |
HKMA-Other Inflows from WSME, NFC, Sov, CB, MDB and PSE |
Other inflows from fully performing loans, which have a specified maturity and are extended to small and medium enterprises treated as wholesale (WSME), non-financial corporate (NFC), sovereigns (Sov), central banks (CB), multilateral development banks (MDB) and public sector enterprises. |
The inflow rate on the fully performing loans with a stated maturity, extended to wholesale SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and public sector enterprises is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% rollover, that is, 100% inflow on performing loans from central banks and a 50% rollover, that is, 50% inflow on those from other non-financial counterparties specified earlier. |
BCBS
238 Para 150 to 151, 154 |
8 |
HKMA-Other Inf from Other Wholesale Counter parties |
Other Inflows from Other Wholesale Counterparties. |
The inflow rate on the fully performing loans with a stated maturity, extended to counterparties other than retail, SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and public sector enterprises, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% rollover, that is, 100% inflow on performing loans from other financial entities and a 50% rollover, that is, 50% inflow on those from other non-financial counterparties. |
|
9 |
HKMA-Revolving, Non-Maturity and Non-Performing Inflow Excl |
Exclusion of inflows from revolving products, products that do not have a specified maturity, and products that are not fully performing. |
The exclusion of cash inflows from revolving assets, assets that do not have a stated maturity, and assets that are not fully performing are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% rollover on the inflows from such assets. |
BCBS 238 Para
151 |
10 |
HKMA-Other Deposit Inflows |
This assumption applies zero percent rollover for Balance with Banks product-related accounts, for principal cash flow type. |
This assumption applies a factor on Deposits held at other banks. |
BCBS
238 Para 152 |
11 |
HKMA-Open Maturity Loan Minimum Payment Inflows |
Inflows due to minimum payments received within the LCR horizon on open maturity loans. |
The inflow rate on the minimum payments of principal, interest, and fee, that are contractually due within the LCR horizon, on an open maturity loan, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on such minimum payments. |
|
12 |
HKMA-Operational Deposit Inflows |
This assumption rollovers 100 percent cash flows for Operational balance with banks related accounts. |
The inflow rate on the deposits, held by the bank at other institutions for operational purposes, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow on such operational deposits. |
BCBS 238 Para
156 |
13 |
HKMA-Derivative cash inflows |
Net cash inflows from derivative transactions. |
The inflow rate on the 30-day cash inflows from derivative transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on derivative cash inflows, on a net basis in case of derivatives which are part of a netting agreement and on a non-net basis for other derivatives. |
BCBS 238 Para
158 to 159 |
14 |
HKMA-Non-HQLA Security Inflows |
This assumption performs the rollover of Asset-backed securities, debt securities, Bills, Commercial paper which satisfy HQLA. |
The inflow rate on the performing securities that are excluded from the stock of HQLA is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on both the principal and interest cash flows from securities classified as Other Assets and securities classified as HQLA but does not meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the stock of HQLA. It also applies a 0% inflow rate on non-performing securities and securities that are classified as HQLA and meet the criteria for inclusion in the stock of HQLA, to avoid double counting. |
BCBS 238 Para
155 |
15 |
HKMA-Contractual Interest Inflows |
This assumption does a zero percent rollover for interest cash flows for fully performing loans, leases, credit cards, overdraft, line of credit, a home equity line of credit, Balance with banks. |
The inflow rate on the interest contractually receivable, on fully performing assets other than non-HQLA securities, within the LCR horizon is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on interest in the form of a 0% rollover rate. |
BCBS 238 Para
142, 160 |
16 |
HKMA- Non lien marked stable retail deposits |
Run-offs on the stable portion of non-lien marked deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail. |
The run-off rates on the stable portion of non-lien marked deposits from retail customers and SMEs who are treated like retail customers for the purposes of LCR are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 5% Run-off on the stable portion of retail deposits, and either mature or result in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon. |
BCBS 238 Para
75-78 |
17 |
HKMA-Penalty Free Stable Retail and SME Runoff |
Run-offs on the portion of stable term deposits, from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding (UWF) from SMEs treated as retail, that is treated as demand deposits. |
The run-off rates on the portion of stable term deposits, that are treated as demand deposits, from retail customers and SMEs who are treated like retail customers for the purposes of LCR are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 5% Run-off on the portion of stable retail deposits maturing beyond the LCR horizon, that do not meet additional criteria for deposit insurance schemes and can either be withdrawn without incurring a penalty or are allowed to be withdrawn despite a clause that says the depositor has no legal right to withdraw. |
BCBS 238 Para
82-84 |
18 |
HKMA- Lien marked stable retail deposits |
Runoffs on the stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail. |
This assumption defines the run-off rates on the stable portion of lien marked deposits from all customers treated as retail, wherein the deposit maturity and the encumbrance period are within the LCR horizon. Since such deposits can be withdrawn within the horizon, these are treated similarly to non-lien marked stable deposits. This assumption applies a 5% Run-off rate on the stable portion of such deposit. |
Part 7 Division 5, 41 (2) |
19 |
HKMA- Unencumbered stable lien marked deposits |
Runoffs on the unencumbered stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail. |
Runoff rates for an unencumbered stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail wherein the deposit maturity is within the horizon, but the encumbrance period is beyond the LCR horizon is defined as a part of this assumption. The unencumbered stable portion of such deposits receives a 5% Run-off rate. |
|
20 |
HKMA- Enc portion excl of retail Lien marked deposit |
Runoffs on the encumbered portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail. |
Runoffs on the encumbered portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail wherein the deposit maturity is within the horizon, but the encumbrance period is beyond the LCR horizon is defined as a part of this assumption. The encumbered portion of both stable and less stable lien marked deposits receive a 0% Run-off rate. |
|
21 |
HKMA- Non lien marked less stable deposits |
Run-offs on the less stable portion of non-lien marked deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail. |
The run-off rates on the less stable portion of non-lien marked deposits from retail customers and SMEs who are treated like retail customers for the purposes of LCR are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 10% Run-off on the portion of retail deposits that do not meet the deposit stability criteria and either mature or result in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon. |
BCBS 238 Para
79-81 |
22 |
HKMA-Penalty Free less Stable Retail and SME Runoff |
Run-offs on the portion of less stable term deposits, from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding (UWF) from SMEs treated as retail, that is treated as demand deposits. |
The run-off rates on the portion of less stable term deposits, that are treated as demand deposits, from retail customers and SMEs who are treated like retail customers for the purposes of LCR are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 10% Run-off on the portion of retail deposits maturing beyond the LCR horizon, that do not meet the deposit stability criteria and can either be withdrawn without incurring a penalty or are allowed to be withdrawn despite a clause that says the depositor has no legal right to withdraw. |
BCBS 238 Para
82-84 |
23 |
HKMA- Lien marked less stable retail deposits |
Run-offs on the stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail. |
This assumption defines the run-off rates on the less stable portion of lien marked deposits from all customers treated as retail, wherein the deposit maturity and the encumbrance period is within the LCR horizon. Since such deposits can be withdrawn within the horizon, these are treated similarly to non-lien marked less stable deposits. This assumption applies a 10% Run-off rate on the stable portion of such deposit. |
Part 7 Division 5, 41 (2) |
24 |
HKMA- Unencumbered less stable lien marked deposits |
Run-offs on the unencumbered less stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail. |
Run-off rates for an unencumbered less stable portion of lien marked deposits from customers treated as retail wherein the deposit maturity is within the horizon, but the encumbrance period is beyond the LCR horizon is defined as a part of this assumption. The unencumbered less stable portion of such deposits receive a 10% Run-off rate. |
|
25 |
HKMA-Run-off on Unsecured Non-Operational Funding from SMEs |
This assumption Rollovers 60 percent cash flows for deposit accounts which are part of SME. |
This assumption Rollovers 60 percent of cash flows for deposit accounts from Small and medium enterprises. |
107 |
26 |
HKMA-NFC, Sov, CB, MDB, PSE Non-operational UWF Run-off |
This assumption Rollovers 60 percent cash flows for deposit accounts which are part of Corporate, MDB, PSE, Sovereign. |
The run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding that is not classified as an operational deposit, received from non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an 80% rollover, that is, 20% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding accounts that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 60% rollover, that is, 40% Run-off on those non-operational funding accounts that are not fully covered by deposit insurance. |
|
27 |
HKMA- Non Lien marked TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies runoff on EOP balance for Term deposit accounts which are part of corporates, SME, Central Bank, MDB. |
The run-off rates for non-lien marked term deposits from sovereigns, Central banks, non-financial corporates, MDB, and PSE are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 40% Run-off on all the counterparties. |
Part 7 Division 5, 41 (2) |
28 |
HKMA- Lien marked TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies 40 percent runoff on the EOP balance of Term Deposit accounts which are part of SME, Corporate, Sovereign, Central Bank, MDB, PSE. |
The run-off rates for lien marked term deposits from sovereigns, Central banks, non-financial corporates, MDB and PSE are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 40% Run-off on all the counterparties. |
|
29 |
HKMA- Unenc part of Lien marked TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies 40 percent runoff on Term deposits which are part of SME, Corporates, MDB, PSE, and are unsecured, non-operational, encumbrance period should be greater than liquidity horizon. |
The run-off rates for the unencumbered portion of lien marked term deposits from sovereigns, Central banks, non-financial corporates, MDB and PSE are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 40% Run-off on all the counterparties. |
|
30 |
HKMA- Enc portion of Lien marked TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies 0 percent runoff on Term deposits which are part of SME, Corporates, MDB, PSE, and are unsecured, non-operational, encumbrance period should be greater than liquidity horizon. |
The run-off rates for the encumbered portion of lien marked term deposits from sovereigns, Central banks, non-financial corporates, MDB and PSE are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% Run-off on all the counterparties. |
|
31 |
HKMA-NFC, Sov, CB, MDB, PSE UWF Run-off on Non-op Balance |
This assumption applies 0 percent runoff on Term deposits which are part of SME, Corporates, MDB, PSE and are unsecured, operational, encumbrance period should be greater than liquidity horizon and maturity should be less than liquidity horizon. |
The run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding that is not classified as an operational deposit, received from non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an 80% rollover, that is, 20% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding accounts that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 60% rollover, that is, 40% Run-off on those non-operational funding accounts that are not fully covered by deposit insurance. |
|
32 |
HKMA- Lien marked Ins TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies a 20 percent runoff rate for lien marked fully insured TDs. |
This set of assumptions treat accounts that are lien marked and fully insured term deposits 20% Run-off rate is applied for the unencumbered portion and 0% is applied for the encumbered portion. |
Part 7 Division 5, 41 (2) |
33 |
HKMA- Unenc part of Lien marked Ins TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies a 20 percent runoff rate for Unencumbered part of lien marked fully insured TDs. |
||
34 |
HKMA- Enc portion of Lien marked Ins TDs from Sov and others |
This assumption applies 0 percent runoff rate for encumbered part of lien marked fully insured TDs. |
||
35 |
HKMA-Other Legal Entity Unsecured Wholesale Funding Run-off |
Run-off on unsecured wholesale funding, from wholesale customers other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, provided for non-operational purposes. |
The run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding that is not classified as an operational deposit, received from wholesale counterparties other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% rollover, that is, 100% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding accounts. |
109 |
36 |
HKMA-UWF Run-off on Non-operational Balance of Other Ent |
Run-off on the non-operational portion of unsecured wholesale funding (UWF) provided by customers other than non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs that are classified as an operational deposit. |
The run-off rates on the non-operational portion of operational deposits from SME's treated as wholesale customers for the purposes of LCR, and other parties such as sovereigns, central banks, and so on are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 20% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 40% run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are not fully covered by deposit insurance. |
109 |
37 |
HKMA-Issued Debt Security Outflow |
Outflows on debt securities issued by the bank itself. |
The run-off rates on the debt securities issued by the bank itself are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 90% rollover, that is, 10% Run-off on issued securities that are sold exclusively in the retail market and held in retail accounts, and 0% rollover, that is, 100% Run-off on all other issued securities. |
110 |
38 |
HKMA-Insured Operational Balance Run-off |
Run-off on the portion of the operational balance, from deposits generated by clearing, custody, and cash management activities, that is fully covered by deposit insurance. |
The run-off rates on the insured portion of the balance held in operational accounts to fulfill operational requirements are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 3% Run-off on insured operational balances that meet the additional criteria for deposit insurance schemes and a 5% Run-off on those that do not meet the additional criteria. |
93
to 104 |
39 |
HKMA-Uninsured Operational Balance Run-off |
Run-off on the portion of the operational balance, from deposits generated by clearing, custody, and cash management activities, that is not covered by deposit insurance. |
The run-off rates on the uninsured portion of the balance held in operational accounts to fulfill operational requirements are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 25% Run-off on operational balances that are not covered by deposit insurance. |
|
40 |
HKMA-Secured Funding Run-Off |
Run-off on secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from sovereigns, central banks, and multilateral development banks. |
The run-off rates on the secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory run-offs applicable to each counterparty type in the form of rollover rates, that is, 1 - Run-off rates. |
112
to 115 |
41 |
HKMA-Run-off on Secured Funding From PSEs |
Run-off on secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from PSEs. |
The run-off rates on the secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory run-offs applicable to PSEs in the form of rollover rates, that is, 1 - Run-off rates. |
|
42 |
HKMA-Run-off on Secured Funding From Other Counterparties |
Run-off on secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from counterparties other than sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs. |
The run-off rates on the secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from counterparties other than sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, where the transaction is backed by level 2B non-RMBS or other assets, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory run-offs applicable to other counterparties, based on the asset quality of the placed collateral, in the form of rollover rates, that is, 1 - Run-off rates. |
|
43 |
HKMA - Collateral Swap Run-off |
Run-off on collateral swap transactions. |
The run-off rates on collateral swaps are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the run-offs applicable to the market value of received collateral, when the collateral received under a swap transaction is of a higher quality than the collateral placed, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the received and placed collateral. |
|
44 |
HKMA-Derivative cash outflows |
Net cash outflows from derivative transactions. |
The outflow rate on the 30-day cash outflows from derivative transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on derivatives cash outflows, on a net basis in case of derivatives which are part of a netting agreement and on a non-net basis for other derivatives. |
116 to 117 |
45 |
HKMA-Additional Coll Required Due to Ratings Downgrade |
Increased liquidity needs arising from the requirement to post additional collateral due to a 3-notch rating downgrade. |
The outflow rate, on the additional collateral required to be posted on contracts with downgrade triggers, due to a 3-notch rating downgrade, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the downgrade impact amount arising from a 3-notch rating downgrade. |
118 |
46 |
HKMA-Loss of Re-hypothecation Right Due to Ratings Downgrade |
Increased liquidity needs arising from a loss of re-hypothecation rights on assets received as collateral due to a 3-notch rating downgrade. |
The outflow rate, on the additional cash outflows arising on contracts with downgrade triggers, that result in a loss of re-hypothecation rights due to a 3-notch rating downgrade, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of mitigants received under re-hypothecation rights corresponding to accounts whose downgrade trigger is activated due to the 3-notch ratings downgrade. |
|
47 |
HKMA-Increased Liquidity Needs Due to Change in Coll Value |
Increased liquidity needs arising from the potential change in the value of posted collateral. |
The outflow rate on the additional cash outflow due to a potential loss in the market value of non-level 1 assets posted as collateral is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of non-level 1 posted collateral computed after netting the non-level 1 collateral received under re-hypothecation rights on the same transaction. |
119 |
48 |
HKMA-Increased Liquidity Needs Due To Excess Collateral |
Increased liquidity needs arising from excess non-segregated collateral received that can be recalled by the counterparty. |
The outflow rate on the excess unsegregated collateral held by a bank, which can potentially be withdrawn by the counterparty, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of excess collateral. |
120 |
49 |
HKMA-Increased Liquidity Needs from Contractually Due Coll |
Increased liquidity needs arising from the collateral that is contractually required to be posted to the counterparty but has not yet been posted. |
The outflow rate on the collateral that the bank is contractually required to post to its counterparty, but has not yet posted, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of contractually due collateral. |
121 |
50 |
HKMA - Increased Liquidity Needs Due to Substitutable Coll |
Increased liquidity needs arising from contracts that allow a counterparty to substitute lower quality collateral for the current higher quality collateral. |
The outflow rate on the collateral that the counterparty can contractually substitute with lower quality collateral is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an outflow rate equal to the difference between the liquidity haircuts of collateral that can be potentially substituted by the counterparty and the collateral that substitutes it. |
122 |
51 |
HKMA - Increased Liquidity Needs Due to Market Val Changes |
Increased liquidity needs arising from market valuation changes on derivatives and other transactions. |
The outflow rate on the collateral outflows occurring due to market valuation changes on derivatives and other transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow rate on the largest absolute net 30-day collateral flow occurring during the preceding 24 months under the historical look-back approach. |
123 |
52 |
HKMA - Loss of Funding on Structured Financing Instruments |
Loss of funding on asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments. |
The run-off rate on the maturing asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% run-off on structured financing instruments that mature within the LCR horizon. |
124 |
53 |
HKMA - Loss of Funding from Financing Facility-Maturing Debt |
Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial paper, conduits, securities investment vehicles and other such financing facilities due to inability to refinance maturing debt. |
The run-off rate on the maturing amounts of asset-backed commercial paper, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% run-off on the EOP balance of the structured financing facilities that mature within the LCR horizon. |
125 |
54 |
HKMA - Loss of Funding from Financing Facility-Ret of Assets |
Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial paper, conduits, securities investment vehicles and other such financing facilities due to potential return of assets. |
The run-off rate on the returnable assets underlying asset-backed commercial paper, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% run-off on the value of the assets that are returnable within the LCR horizon. |
|
55 |
HKMA - Loss of Funding from Financing Facility - Liq Draws |
Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial paper, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities due to drawdown of liquidity facilities provided by the bank. |
The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the liquidity facility extended to the structured financing facility is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow as a drawdown rate on the liquidity facilities extended as support for structured financing purposes. |
|
56 |
HKMA-Drawdowns on Committed Credit and Liquidity Facilities |
Drawdowns on committed facilities received by the bank. |
The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to retail customers, SMEs, corporates, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, and PSEs is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, based on the counterparty type, for the aforementioned counterparties. |
126
to 131 |
57 |
HKMA-Draws on Committed Facilities Extended to Banks |
Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to entities other than retail customers, SMEs, corporates, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, PSEs, and banks. |
The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, for banks, including those subject to prudential regulation. |
|
58 |
HKMA-Draws on Committed Facilities Extended to Other Entity |
Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities to other legal entities. |
The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers other than retail customers, SMEs, corporates, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, PSEs, and banks is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow as a drawdown rate to all counterparties excluding the aforementioned counterparties. |
|
59 |
HKMA-Other Contractual Obligations to Financial Institutions |
Outflows related to other contractual obligations to extend funds within 30 days to financial institutions. |
The outflow rate on other contractual obligations to extend funds to financial institutions, not covered in the previous assumptions, is predefined as part of this business assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow rate on such contractual obligations. |
132 |
60 |
HKMA-Other Contractual Obligations to Non-Financial Cust |
Outflows related to other contractual obligations to extend funds within 30 days to retail and non-financial wholesale counterparties. |
The outflow rate on the other contractual obligations to extend funds to retail and non-financial corporate customers, in excess of 50% of contractual inflows from such customers within the LCR horizon, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the excess contractual obligation amount. |
133 |
61 |
HKMA-Other Contingent Funding Obligation Outflows |
Outflows related to trade finance related instruments. |
This assumption applies a 5% factor on Trade finance related instruments. |
134 to 140 |
62 |
HKMA-Uncommitted Facility Outflows |
Drawdowns on uncommitted credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers. |
The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the uncommitted credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% drawdown on the uncommitted facilities. The drawdown rates are allowed to be updated to reflect the rates specified by national regulators. |
134 to 140 |
63 |
HKMA-Outflows Related to Short Positions |
Outflows related to customer and bank short positions. |
The outflow rate on the customer and firm short positions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption specifies outflows on the short positions based on assets covering such short positions. |
147 |
64 |
HKMA-Non-contractual Obligation Outflows |
Outflows from non-contractual obligations related to joint ventures, minority investments, debt buy-back requests, structured products, managed funds, and any other similar obligations. |
The outflow rate on the non-contractual obligations related to joint ventures, minority investments, debt buy-back requests, structured products, managed funds, and any other similar obligations is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% outflow rate on non-contractual obligations. The outflow rate is allowed to be updated to reflect the rates specified by national regulators. |
134 to 140 |
65 |
HKMA-Contractual Interest Payment Outflows |
This assumption rollovers zero percent for interest type cash flow for deposits, securities issued, borrowings, money market, line of credit received and annuity contracts. |
The outflow rate on the interest payments contractually due within the LCR horizon is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on interest in the form of a 0% rollover rate. |
141 |
66 |
HKMA-Contractual Dividend Payment Outflows |
Outflows related to contractual payments of dividends. |
The outflow rate on the dividends payable within the LCR horizon is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on dividends payable. |
|
67 |
HKMA-NFC, Sov, CB, MDB, PSE UWF Runoff on Ins Non-op Bal |
This assumption applies 20 percent runoff on Term deposits which are part of SME, Corporates, MDB, PSE and are unsecured, operational and maturity should be less than liquidity horizon. |
The run-off rates on the non-operational portion of operational deposits from non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 20% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 40% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are not fully covered by deposit insurance. |
96, 107 to
108 |
68 |
HKMA-NFC, Sov, CB, MDB, PSE Non-operational Run-off |
Run-off on the unsecured wholesale funding (UWF), provided by non-financial corporate (NFC), sovereigns (Sov), central banks (CB), multilateral development banks (MDB), and PSEs, that is not classified as an operational deposit. This is achieved by rolling over 60 percent run-off rate to beyond the LCR horizon of 30 days. |
The run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding that is not classified as an operational deposit, received from non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an 80% rollover, that is, 20% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding accounts that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 60% rollover, that is, 40% Run-off on those non-operational funding accounts that are not fully covered by deposit insurance. |
96, 107 to
108 |
The list of preconfigured rules and the corresponding reference to the regulatory requirement that it addresses are provided in the following table.
NOTE:
This list contains only the Rules which directly correspond to regulatory references. For the complete set of Rules, T2T and Functions used in HKMA LCR, see the Run Chart.
Sl. No. |
Rule Name |
Rule Description |
Regulatory Requirement Addressed |
Regulatory Reference 1. HKMA Banking (Liquidity) Rules Capital
155 Sub leg Q |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
LRM - HKMA - Classification Of Operational Deposits And Non-Operational Balance Computation |
This rule classifies accounts as operational deposits based on guidelines and computes that portion of the EOP balance of such accounts which is truly operational in nature. These values are updated in the FSI_LRM_INSTRUMENT table. |
The classification of an account as operational or non-operational as per RBI guidelines and the computation of the operational portion of the EOP balance is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7- paragraph 25 |
2 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 1 - Cash and Central Bank Reserve |
This rule reclassifies cash, banknotes, and central bank reserves, to the extent that the central bank policies allow them to be drawn down in times of stress, as HQLA Level 1 assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of cash and central bank reserves as HQLA level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2 1a and b |
3 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 1 - Sovereign, CB , PSE and MDB Issued Zero Risk Weight Securities |
This rule reclassifies marketable securities issued by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, European Community, and multilateral development banks as HQLA Level 1 assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of zero risk weight marketable securities issued by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, European Community, and multilateral development banks as HQLA level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2 1c |
4 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 1 - Sovereign, CB , PSE and MDB Guaranteed Zero Risk Weight Securities |
This rule reclassifies marketable securities guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, European Community, and multilateral development banks as HQLA Level 1 assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of zero risk weight marketable securities guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, the Bank for International Settlements, the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, European Community, and multilateral development banks as HQLA level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2 1c |
5 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 1 - Sec by Sovereign and CB with Non-Zero Risk Weight in Domestic Currencies |
This rule reclassifies securities issued by non-zero risk weight sovereigns and central banks as HQLA Level 1 assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of securities issued in the domestic currency by non-zero risk weight sovereigns and central banks as HQLA level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2 1d |
6 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 1 - Sec by Sovereign and CB with Non-Zero Risk Weight in Foreign Currency |
This rule reclassifies securities issued by non-zero risk weight domestic sovereigns and central banks in foreign currency as HQLA Level 1 assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of securities issued in foreign currencies by non-zero risk weight domestic sovereigns and central banks as HQLA level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2 1e |
7 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 2A - Sovereign, CB , PSE and MDB 20 percent Risk Weight Securities |
This rule reclassifies the non-zero risk weight securities either issued or guaranteed by Sovereign, Central Bank, PSE, and Multilateral Development Bank as HQLA Level 2A assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of 20% risk weight marketable securities guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, or multilateral development banks as HQLA Level 2A assets are configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2-2a |
8 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 2A - Non-Financial Corporate Bonds |
This rule reclassifies debt securities other than covered bonds issued by non-financial corporates as HQLA Level 2A assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of corporate bonds, excluding covered bonds, as HQLA Level 2A assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2-2a |
9 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 2A - Covered Bonds |
This rule reclassifies covered bonds issued by non-financial corporates as HQLA Level 2A assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of covered bonds as HQLA Level 2A assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2-2b&c |
10 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 2B RMBS |
This rule reclassifies residential mortgage-backed securities as HQLA Level 2B RMBS assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of residential mortgage-backed securities as HQLA level 2B RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2- 3B |
11 |
LRM - HKMA - HQLA Level 2B Non-RMBS - Non-Financial Corporate Bonds |
This rule reclassifies debt securities issued by non-financial corporates as HQLA Level 2B Non-RMBS assets in accordance with the criteria specified by HKMA. |
The classification of debt securities, including commercial papers, issued by non-financial corporates as HQLA level 2B non-RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Schedule 2 Part 2- 3a |
12 |
LRM - HKMA - Bank Own Assets - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update |
This rule identifies whether the bank's own assets, both unencumbered assets as well as those placed as collateral, meet the operational requirements set forth by the regulator, except for being unencumbered in the case of placed collateral. In the case of unencumbered assets, it updates the Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag. In case of placed collateral, it updates the Meets HQLA Operational Requirements on Unwind Flag. |
The identification of whether an asset owned by the bank meets the operational requirements set forth by BIS for its inclusion in the stock of HQLA is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS Paragraphs 28 to 42 |
13 |
LRM - HKMA - Re-hypothecated Mitigants - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update |
This rule identifies whether a rehypothecated mitigant meets the operational requirements set forth by the regulator, except for being unencumbered. It updates the Meets HQLA Operational Requirements on Unwind Flag for such mitigants. |
The identification of whether collateral received from a counterparty that is further placed as collateral meets the operational requirements set forth by BIS on unwinding is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS Paragraphs 28 to 42 |
14 |
LRM - HKMA - Mitigants - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update |
This computation rule updates the HQLA Eligibility Flag for the bank’s own unencumbered assets classified as HQLA that fulfill the HQLA operational requirements and therefore can be included in the stock of HQLA. It also updates the Eligible HQLA on the Unwind flag for all assets placed as collateral that are classified as HQLA that fulfill the HQLA operational requirements on unwinding and therefore are to be unwound. |
This computation rule updates the HQLA Eligibility Flag for bank’s own unencumbered assets classified as HQLA that fulfill the HQLA operational requirement. |
BIS Paragraphs 28 to 42 |
15 |
LRM - HKMA - Mitigants - Eligible High Quality Liquid Assets Flag Update |
This computation rule updates the HQLA Eligibility Flag for mitigants classified as HQLA that fulfill the HQLA operational requirements and therefore can be included in the stock of HQLA. |
The identification of whether a Mitigant is eligible to be included in the stock of HQLA is done as a part of this Rule. |
BIS Paragraphs 28 to 42 |
16 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Secured Funding Transaction-Addition |
This rule reclassifies all secured funding transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the collateral posted is a level 1 asset to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA, due to such an unwind, as the addition of the collateral posted. |
The identification of secured funding transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
17 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Secured Funding Transaction-Deduction |
This rule reclassifies all the secured funding transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the amount received. |
The identification of secured funding transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
18 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Secured Lending Transaction-Addition |
This rule reclassifies all the secured lending transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the addition of the amount paid. |
The identification of secured lending transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
19 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Secured Lending Transaction-Deduction |
This rule reclassifies all the secured lending transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 1 asset, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of secured lending transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
20 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Addition |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a level 1 asset, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the addition of the collateral posted. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
21 |
LRM - HKMA Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Deduction |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 1 asset and the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
22 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Secured Funding Transaction |
This rule reclassifies all secured funding transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the collateral posted is a level 2A asset, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA, due to such an unwind, as the addition of the collateral posted. |
The identification of secured funding transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
23 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Secured Lending Transaction |
This rule reclassifies all the secured lending transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2A asset, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of secured lending transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
24 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Addition |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2A asset and the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwinds as the addition of the collateral received. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
25 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Deduction |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2A asset and the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
26 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2B RMBS, Non-RMBS Stock Adjustment - Secured Lending Transaction |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a level 2A asset, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the addition of the collateral posted. |
The identification of secured lending transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 2B RMBS and non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
27 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2B RMBS,Non RMBS Stock Adjustment - Secured Funding Transaction |
This rule reclassifies all the secured lending transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2B asset, either RMBS or non-RMBS, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of secured funding transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 2B RMBS and non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
28 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2B RMBS,Non RMBS Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Addition |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2B asset, either RMBS or non-RMBS, and the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the addition of the collateral received. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of level 2B RMBS and non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
29 |
LRM - HKMA Level 2B RMBS,Non RMBS Stock Adjustment - Asset Exchange Deduction |
This rule reclassifies all the asset exchange transactions that mature within the LCR horizon and therefore are required to be unwound, where the mitigant received is a level 2B asset, either RMBS or non-RMBS, and the collateral posted is an HQLA, to the appropriate adjustment rule. It updates the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind as the deduction of the collateral received. |
The identification of asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of level 2B RMBS and non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule. |
BIS-
Annex 1 |
30 |
LRM - NCOF Computation |
This rule computes the net cash outflow over the liquidity horizon based on the regulatory formula at the legal entity level as well as a legal entity - significant currency level and updates these values in the FCT_LRM_LE_SUMMARY table. |
The computation of the net cash outflows as per the regulatory formula is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7 Paragraphs 39 to 42 |
31 |
LRM - HKMA - Level 2B Asset Cap Amount Calculation |
This rule calculates the adjusted level 2B asset cap amount as per the regulatory formula using the adjusted amounts of high-quality liquid assets and updates it in the FCT_LRM_LE_SUMMARY table at both legal entity level and legal entity - significant currency level. |
The computation of the adjustment for 15% cap on level 2B assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7- paragraphs 18-24 |
32 |
LRM - HKMA - Level 2 Asset Cap Amount Calculation |
This rule calculates the adjusted level 2 asset cap amount as per the regulatory formula using the adjusted amounts of high-quality liquid assets and the adjusted level 2B cap amount. This value is updated in the FCT_LRM_LE_SUMMARY table at both the legal entity level and legal entity - significant currency level. |
The computation of the adjustment for 40% cap on Level 2 assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7- paragraphs 18-24 |
33 |
LRM - Stock of High Quality Liquid Asset Computation |
This rule calculates the stock of high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) and updates the value in the FCT_LRM_LE_SUMMARY table at MASh legal entity level and legal entity - significant currency level. |
The computation of the stock of high-quality liquid assets is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7- paragraphs 18-24 |
34 |
LRM - Liquidity Coverage Ratio Computation |
This rule calculates the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) at a legal entity level and legal entity - significant currency level on a solo and consolidated basis and updates the values in the FCT_LRM_LE_SUMMARY table. |
The computation of the liquidity coverage ratio is configured as part of this rule. |
HKMA Part 7- paragraphs 18-24 |