3        Liquidity Coverage Ratio Calculation

LCR is the first standard that assesses the short-term liquidity challenges of a bank.

Topics:

·        Inputs 

·        Process Flow 

·        Preconfigured Regulatory LCR Scenario 

Inputs

The LRRCMAS application requires the following inputs for LCR calculation:

·        Liquidity haircut for each asset level should be provided through business assumption with assumption category as valuation change and assumption subcategory as the haircut.

·        The business assumption which defines the outflow percentage should be defined through appropriate business assumptions. For example, retail deposit Run-off is defined through business assumption with category as incremental cash flow and sub-category as Run-off.

·        The business assumption which defines the inflow percentage should be defined through appropriate business assumptions. For example, Rollover Reverse Repo is defined through business assumption with category as cash flow movement and subcategory as a Roll Over.

·        Liquidity Horizon is specified as the Runtime parameter.

Process Flow

The application supports a ready-to-use MAS LCR, which has the regulatory scenario with associated HQLA haircuts, inflow, and outflow percentage or rates preconfigured in the form of rules and business assumptions.

Topics:

·        Identifying Asset Levels 

·        Identifying Eligible HQLA

·        Calculating Stock of HQLA

·        Determining Maturity of Cash Flows

·        Insurance Allocation

·        Identifying Deposit Stability

·        Identifying and Treating Pledged Deposits

·        Secured Funding

·        Classifying Operational Deposits

·        Calculating Contractually Required Collateral

·        Calculating Excess Collateral

·        Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount

·        Calculating Net Derivative Cash Inflows and Outflows

·        Calculating Twenty-Four Month Look-back Amount

·        Calculating Operational Amount

·        Calculating HQLA Transferability Restriction

·        Calculating Net Cash Outflows

·        Consolidation

·        Calculating Liquidity Coverage Ratio

·        Significant Currency Liquidity Coverage Ratio Calculation

Identifying Asset Levels

All assets, whether owned by the bank or received from counterparties as collateral, that meet the high quality liquid asset criteria specified by MAS, are classified as follows:

·        Level 1 Assets

·        Level 2A Assets

·        Level 2B(I) Assets

·        Level 2B(II) RMBS Assets

·        Level 2B(II) non-RMBS Assets

Level 1 assets can be included in the stock of HQLA without limit and Level 2 assets can only include 40% of the stock of HQLA. Of this, Level 2B and Level 2B(II) assets can only include of 15% and 5% of the stock of HQLA, respectively. Any asset not classified as an HQLA is considered as an Other Asset.

Topics:

·        Identifying and Treating Level 1 Assets 

·        Identifying and Treating Level 2A Assets 

·        Identifying and Treating Level 2B(I) Assets 

·        Identifying and Treating Level 2B(II) RMBS Assets 

·        Identifying and Treating Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Assets 

Identifying and Treating Level 1 Assets

Level 1 assets are assets which qualify to be fully included as part of the stock of high-quality liquid assets computing LCR. The application identifies the following as HQLA Level 1 assets:

1.     Cash which includes coins, banknotes, and restricted cash. The value included in the stock of HQLA is the cash balance.

2.     Central bank reserves (including excess and required reserves), to the extent that the central bank policies allow them to be drawn down in times of stress. These include the following:

a.     Banks’ overnight deposits with the central bank.

b.     Term deposits with the central bank that satisfy the following conditions:

    They are explicitly and contractually repayable on notice from the depositing bank.

    They constitute a loan against which the bank can borrow on a term basis or an overnight but automatically renewable basis (only where the bank has an existing deposit with the relevant central bank).

The value of eligible term deposits that are included in the amount net of any withdrawal penalty.

3.     Sukuk issued by Singapore Sukuk Pte. Ltd.

4.     Marketable securities, assigned a 0% risk-weight, which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type or Guarantor type is one of the following:

    Sovereign

    Central Bank

    Public Sector Entity

    Regional Government, Municipalities, and State Agencies

    Multi-lateral Development Bank

    The Bank For International Settlements (BIS)

    The International Monetary Fund

    The European Central Bank and European Commission

§       Not an obligation of a financial institution or any of its affiliated entities

5.     Debt securities issued in domestic currencies in the country in which the liquidity risk is being taken or in the bank’s home country where the issuer type is the sovereign or central bank and the risk weight assigned to the issuer is greater than 0%.

6.     Debt securities issued in foreign currencies are eligible up to the amount of the bank’s stressed net cash outflows in that specific foreign currency stemming from the bank’s operations in the country in which the liquidity risk is being taken or in the bank’s home country where the issuer type is the sovereign or central bank and the risk weight assigned to the issuer is greater than 0%.

Identifying and Treating Level 2A Assets

The application identifies the following as HQLA Level 2A assets.

1.     Marketable securities, assigned a 20% risk-weight, which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type or Guarantor Type is one of the following:

    Sovereign

    Central Bank

    Public Sector Entity

    Regional Government, Municipalities, and State Agencies

    Multi-lateral Development Bank

§       Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 10% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.

§       Not an obligation of a financial institution or any of its affiliated entities.

2.     Debt securities (including commercial paper) issued by corporates, Sukuk issued by an institution other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. and covered bonds, which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type is not the bank itself for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities

§       Assigned a rating equal to or greater than AA- or,

§       Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 10% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.

§       For corporate debt securities, the issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities.

Identifying and Treating Level 2B(I) Assets

The application identifies the following as HQLA Level 2B(I) assets:

Debt securities (including commercial paper) issued by corporates, and Sukuk issued by institutions other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. satisfying the following conditions:

·        Issuer type is not the bank itself for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities.

·        Assigned a rating between A+ to A-

·        Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 20% over 30 days during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.

·        For corporate debt securities, issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities

Identifying and Treating Level 2B(II) RMBS Assets

The application identifies the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) satisfying the following conditions listed as HQLA Level 2B(II) RMBS assets:

·        Issuer type is not the bank for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities.

·        Issuer type of the underlying assets is not the bank itself for which the computations are being carried out or any of its affiliated entities.

·        Assigned a rating equal to or greater than AA.

·        Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by 20% over a 30-day period during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress specified by the bank.

·        The underlying asset pool consists of residential mortgages only and does not contain any structured products.

·        The underlying mortgages are “full recourse’’ loans, and have a maximum Loan-To-Value ratio (LTV) of less than or equal to 80%

·        The securitizations are subject to “risk retention” regulations which require issuers to retain an interest in the assets they securitize.

Identifying and Treating Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Assets

The application identifies the following assets as HQLA Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS assets:

1.     Marketable securities which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities.

§       Issuer and guarantor type is a Sovereign or Central Bank.

§       Assigned a rating between BBB+ and BBB-.

§       Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 20% over a 30-day period during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.

2.     Debt securities issued by corporates, and Sukuk issued by institutions other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd, which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities (in case of corporate debt securities).

§       Assigned a rating between BBB+ and BBB-.

§       Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 20% over a 30-day period, during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress which is specified by the bank.

3.     Common equities which satisfy the following conditions:

§       Issuer type is not a financial institution or its affiliated entities.

§       Are exchange-traded and centrally cleared.

§       Are a constituent of the major stock index in the legal entity’s home jurisdiction, or where the liquidity risk is taken, as decided by the supervisor in the jurisdiction where the index is located.

§       Are denominated in the domestic currency of the legal entity’s home jurisdiction or in the currency of the jurisdiction where the liquidity risk is taken.

§       Price has not decreased, or haircut has not increased by more than 40% over a 30-day period during a relevant period of significant liquidity stress specified by the bank.

NOTE:   

The value of eligible securities included in the HQLA is the market value less hedge termination cost if any.

 

Identifying Eligible HQLA

The application identifies whether a bank’s asset or a mitigant received under rehypothecation rights meets all the operational requirements prescribed by MAS. If an asset classified as HQLA meets all the relevant operational criteria it is identified as eligible HQLA and included in the stock of HQLA.

The application checks for the following operational criteria:

a.     Operational Capability to Monetize HQLA

An asset is considered HQLA only if the bank has demonstrated the operational capability to monetize such an asset and has periodically monetized such an asset. The application captures this information for each asset as a flag.

b.     Unencumbered

The application looks at the encumbrance status and includes only those assets in the stock which are unencumbered. If partially encumbered, then the portion of the asset that is unencumbered is considered as HQLA and included in the stock. If an asset is pledged to the central bank or a PSE but is not used, the unused portion of such an asset is included in the stock. The application assigns the usage of a pledged asset in the ascending order of asset quality that is the lowest quality collateral is marked as used first.

c.     HQLA Under the Control of the Liquidity Management Function

To be considered eligible HQLA the asset is under the control of the management function of the bank that manages liquidity. The application captures this information for each asset as a flag.

d.     Termination of Transaction Hedging HQLA

If an HQLA is hedged by a specific transaction, then the application considers the impact of closing out the hedge to liquidate the asset that is, the cost of terminating the hedge while computing the stock of HQLA. The hedge termination cost is deducted from the market value of the asset and the difference is included in the stock of HQLA.

e.     Transferability Restriction during Consolidation

Surplus HQLA held by a subsidiary can be included in the stock of the parent company only if it is freely available to the parent during times of stress. The assets that have transfer restrictions are identified through a flag. The application only includes the restricted assets to the extent required to cover the subsidiary’s net cash outflows while including the unrestricted assets fully into the consolidated stock of HQLA.

f.       Exclusion of Certain Rehypothecated Assets

Any asset that a bank receives under rehypothecation right is not considered eligible HQLA if the counterparty or beneficial owner of the asset has a contractual right to withdraw the asset at any time within 30 calendar days.

g.     Unsegregated Assets

The application includes unsegregated assets, received as collateral under rehypothecation rights, for derivative transactions, in the stock of HQLA. Conversely, it excludes all segregated assets from the stock of HQLA.

Calculating Stock of HQLA

The stock of High-Quality Liquid Assets (SHQLA) is calculated at the legal entity and currency granularity. This is performed by the rule LRM - Stock of High-Quality Liquid Asset Computation.

All unencumbered assets classified as Level 1, 2A, or 2B, which meet the HQLA eligibility criteria, are included in the SHQLA. The formula for calculating SHQLA is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the SHQLA.

Where,

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the components of SHQLA.

The application applies the relevant liquidity haircuts to the market value of each eligible HQLA based on the haircuts specified as part of a business assumption. The sum of haircut adjusted market value of all assets which are not other assets, and which are classified as eligible HQLA comprises of the stock of HQLA. The stock includes the bank’s assets which are unencumbered, that is not placed as collateral; as well as assets received from counterparties where the bank has a rehypothecation right and where such assets are not rehypothecated.

NOTE:   

All calculations are based on the market value of assets.

 

The following steps are involved in computing the stock of HQLA:

Topics:

·        Calculating Stock of Liquid Assets

·        Identifying Eligible HQLA on Unwind 

·        Unwinding of Transactions Involving Eligible HQLA

·        Calculating Adjusted Stock of HQLA

·        Calculating Adjustments to Stock of HQLA Due to Cap on Level 2 Assets

Calculating Stock of Liquid Assets

1.     Calculating Stock of Level 1 Assets

The stock of Level 1 assets equals the market value of all Level 1 liquid assets held by the bank as of the calculation date that is eligible HQLA, less the amount of the minimum reserve, less hedge termination costs (if any), less withdrawal penalty on time deposits (if any).

2.     Calculating Stock of Level 2A Assets

The stock of Level 2A liquid assets equals 85 percent of the market value of all Level 2A liquid assets held by the bank as of the calculation date that are eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).

3.     Calculating Stock of Level 2B(I) Assets

The stock of Level 2B(I) liquid assets equals 50 percent of the market value of all Level 2B(I) liquid assets held by the bank as of the calculation date that are eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).

4.     Calculating Stock of Level 2B(II) RMBS Assets

The stock of Level 2B(II) RMBS liquid asset amount equals 75 percent of the market value of all Level 2B RMBS liquid assets held by the bank as of the calculation date that is eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).

5.     Calculating Stock of Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Assets

The stock of Level 2B(II) liquid assets equal 50 percent of the market value of all Level 2B non-RMBS liquid assets held by the bank as of the calculation date that is eligible HQLA, less hedge termination costs (if any).

Identifying Eligible HQLA on Unwind

The application identifies the assets placed as collateral which are eligible HQLA if they are not encumbered. Placed collateral is marked as eligible HQLA on unwinding if it fulfills all of the following criteria:

·        Asset Level is Level 1, Level 2A, Level 2B(I), Level 2B(II) RMBS, or Level 2B(II) non-RMBS asset.

·        Meets HQLA Operational Requirements on Unwind.

Unwinding of Transactions Involving Eligible HQLA

The application identifies all transactions maturing within the LCR horizon where HQLA is placed or received. These transactions include repos, reverse repos, secured lending transactions, collateral swaps, and so on. Such transactions are to be unwound that is, the original position is to be reversed and the cash or stock of HQLA has adjusted accordingly. This is done to avoid including any asset in the stock that should be returned to its owner before the end of the LCR horizon. The unwinding of transactions results in adjustments to the stock of HQLA, such as additions to or deductions from the stock of HQLA.

Calculating Adjusted Stock of HQLA

The total stock of HQLA is determined as a minimum of two Stocks. The formula for this calculation is as follows:

1.     Adjusted Stock of Level 1 Assets

The formula for calculating adjusted stock of Level 1 assets is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjusted stock of Level 1 assets.

NOTE:   

Adjustments relate to the cash received or paid and the eligible Level 1 asset posted or received as collateral or underlying assets as part of a secured funding transaction, secured lending transaction, asset exchanges, or collateralized derivatives transaction.

 

2.     Adjusted Stock of Level 2A Assets

The formula for calculating adjusted stock of Level 2A assets is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjusted stock of Level 2A assets.

NOTE:   

Adjustments relate to eligible Level 2A assets posted or received as collateral or underlying assets as part of a secured funding transaction, secured lending transaction, asset exchanges, or collateralized derivatives transaction.

 

3.     Adjusted Stock of Level 2B(I) Assets

The formula for calculating adjusted stock of Level 2B(I) assets is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjusted stock of Level 2B (1)assets.

NOTE:   

Adjustments relate to eligible Level 2B(I) assets posted or received as collateral or underlying assets as part of a secured funding transaction, secured lending transaction, asset exchanges, or collateralized derivatives transaction.

 

4.     Adjusted Stock of Level 2B(II)RMBS Assets

The formula for calculating adjusted stock of Level 2B(II) RMBS assets is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjusted stock of Level 2B (II) assets.

NOTE:   

Adjustments relate to eligible Level 2B(II) RMBS assets posted or received as collateral or underlying assets as part of a secured funding transaction, secured lending transaction, asset exchanges, or collateralized derivatives transaction.

 

5.     Adjusted Stock of Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Assets

The formula for calculating adjusted stock of Level 2B(II) non-RMBS assets is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjusted stock of Level 2B (II) Non-RMBS assets.

NOTE:   

Adjustments relate to eligible Level 2B Non-RMBS assets posted or received as collateral or underlying assets as part of a secured funding transaction, secured lending transaction, asset exchanges, or collateralized derivatives transaction.

 

 

Calculating Adjustments to Stock of HQLA Due to Cap on Level 2 Assets

This section includes the computations involved in the calculation of adjustments to SHQLA due to the cap on Level 2 assets.

1.     Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2B(II) Assets

Level 2B(II) assets can only constitute up to 5% of the stock of HQLA after taking into account the impact of unwinding transactions maturing within the LCR horizon. Adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to cap on Level 2B(II) assets is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2B(II) Assets.

2.     Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2B Assets

Level 2(B) assets can only constitute up to 15 % of the stock of HQLA after taking into account the impact of unwinding transactions maturing within the LCR horizon. Adjustment to Stock of HQLA due to the cap on Level 2B assets is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2B Assets.

3.     Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2 Assets

Level 2 assets can only constitute up to 40% of the stock of HQLA after taking into account the impact of unwinding transactions maturing within the LCR horizon. Adjustment to Stock of HQLA due to the cap on Level 2 assets is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Adjustment Due to Cap on Level 2 Assets.

Determining the Maturity of Cash Flows

To calculate the Liquidity Coverage Ratio, the application identifies the maturity of certain transactions as follows:

1.     For liabilities having embedded optionality, such as callable features, that reduces the maturity of the account, the application considers the earliest date, which is the first call date, as the revised maturity date.

2.     For assets having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received is not rehypothecated, the application considers the earliest date, which is the first call date, plus notice period as the revised maturity date.

3.     For derivatives having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received is not rehypothecated, the application considers the earliest date, which is the first call date, as the revised maturity date.

4.     For assets or derivatives, where the collateral received has been re-hypothecated for a period greater than the maturity of the asset itself, the application considers the maturity date of the liability, against which the collateral received is rehypothecated, as the revised maturity of the asset.

5.     For assets or derivatives having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has been rehypothecated for a period greater than the first call date plus notice period but less than the original maturity of the asset itself, the application considers the maturity date of the liability, against which the collateral received is rehypothecated, as the revised maturity of the asset.

6.     For derivatives having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has been rehypothecated for a period greater than the first call date but less than the original maturity of the asset itself, the application considers the maturity date of the liability, against which the collateral received is rehypothecated, as the revised maturity of the asset.

7.     For assets having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has been rehypothecated for a period less than the first call date plus notice period, the application considers the first call date plus notice period as the revised maturity of the asset.

8.     For derivatives having embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has been rehypothecated for a period less than the first call date plus notice period, the application considers the first call date as the revised maturity of the asset.

9.     For assets and derivatives which do not have embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has been rehypothecated for a period less than the maturity of the asset itself, the application considers the original maturity date of the asset, as the revised maturity of the asset.

10.  For assets and derivatives which do not have embedded optionality that reduces the maturity of the account, where the collateral received has not been rehypothecated, the application considers the original maturity date of the asset, as the revised maturity of the asset.

NOTE:   

The revised maturity is computed by the application as per regulatory expectation and is used for the calculation of LCR.

 

Insurance Allocation

This section provides the steps involved in insurance allocation.

Topics:

·        Identifying Insurance Eligible Accounts

·        Allocating Deposit Insurance

 

Identifying Insurance Eligible Accounts

The identification of insurance eligible accounts involves looking at the inclusion as well as the exclusion criteria. The application requires users to provide the following inclusion criteria:

1.     Ownership Category

There are three ownership categories available in LRRCMAS:

§       SDIC-DI: Ownership categories include single accounts, joint accounts, sole proprietorship, trusts, and company.

§       SDIC-CPFRS: Ownership categories include CPF Retirement Sum Scheme (CPFRS).

§       SDIC-CPFIS: Ownership categories include CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS).

As per the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation (SDIC), a separate limit is assigned to a depositor combination based on the ownership category of accounts. Users are required to provide the ownership categories that get a separate limit. If a particular customer gets a single limit irrespective of whether the accounts are held as single, joint, or a combination, the ownership category should have a single default value.

2.     Product Type

This is a list of product types that are covered under the respective jurisdiction’s deposit insurance scheme. The insurance limit is allocated to only those accounts of a customer whose product types match those that are covered by the deposit insurance. For Singapore, SDIC Deposit Insurance covers all types of deposits such as current accounts, savings accounts, and term deposits, which must be provided as inputs.

3.     Product Type Prioritization

The sequence in which the insured amount is to be allocated to each product type is captured. For instance, product prioritization may be specified as a current account, savings account, and term deposit. This indicates that the insured amount is allocated first to a current account held by the customer. After current accounts have been fully covered, the remaining amount is allocated to savings accounts and finally to term deposits.

NOTE:   

In case product type prioritization is not specified, the default allocation will be proportionate to the EOP balance of each account irrespective of the product type.

 

4.     Currency Eligibility for Insurance

This is a list of currencies in which the accounts are denominated that are eligible for insurance coverage under a deposit insurance scheme. Some jurisdictions cover foreign currency deposits under their deposit insurance schemes. If eligible currencies are specified for insurance, then the insured balance is allocated to all accounts belonging to the particular legal entity which have the associated attributes required for assigning the insured balance. For instance, if SDIC Deposit Insurance ensures only Singapore Dollar-denominated deposits. The eligible currency against SDIC Deposit Insurance should be provided as the Singapore Dollar.

The application includes insurance exemption criteria covering deposits of foreign sovereigns, central and state governments, and banks, and so on. The deposits that are eligible for insurance under a particular insurance scheme are identified based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria as specified by the users.

Allocating Deposit Insurance

As part of the MAS Run, the application allocates the deposit insurance to accounts based on the guidelines specified by the SDIC Deposit Insurance. The insurance limit captured against each deposit insurance scheme is allocated to the insurance-eligible accounts under that scheme based on the ownership category and the depositor combination.

The insurance limit, which is the maximum deposit balance covered by an insurance scheme per customer, is captured against each insurance scheme – ownership category combination. Customers having an account in multiple legal entities get a separate deposit insurance limit per legal entity. As per the SDIC Deposit Insurance scheme, the limit amount must be provided in the Stage Insurance Scheme Master table at the granularity of insurance scheme.

The insurance limit is allocated to accounts as per the procedure given as follows:

1.     The application identifies the established relationship flag at a customer level.

2.     The accounts are sorted by the specified product type prioritizations.

3.     The insurance allocation is done based on the principal balance from the highest to the least, in the order of product type prioritization.

4.     The insurance limit available is allocated to account 1 to n – 1 as per the following formula:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the insurance limit allocation.

 

Where,

Insurance Limit Available:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the insurance limit available.

x: Number of accounts up to the current account to which insured amount is to be allocated

n: Total number of accounts of a customer which are eligible for insurance coverage under a given ownership category

5.     The remaining available insurance is allocated to the last account that is account n for which insurance was not allocated.

6.     If the insurance limit is available after allocating to the principal balances, it is allocated to the accrued interest from the highest to the least in the order of Product Type prioritization.

An illustration of this procedure is provided as follows considering an insurance limit of 50,000 Singapore Dollar (SGD) for each depositor combination under each ownership category for each legal entity as follows.

NOTE:   

·        For the Single, Joint, and Sole proprietorship category, the insurance limit is aggregated for each customer per legal entity.

·        Each account holder in the joint ownership category has an equal share for insurance calculation until specifically provided by the legal entity.

·        Trusts with distinct account numbers are treated separately. Trust accounts are insured on a per account–beneficiary basis without aggregation.

·        Client accounts with distinct account numbers are treated separately. Client accounts are insured on a per-account basis without aggregation.

 

 


The inputs to this calculation, including account details and customer details, are as follows.

 

 Illustration - Allocation of Deposit Insurance

Legal Entity

Account Number

Standard Product Type

Account Balance

Account Currency

Ownership Category

Primary Holder

Secondary Holder

Account Attribute

Unique Depositor Combination

Limit Applicable

Total Deposit per Unique Depositor

Insured Amount

Uninsured Amount

Legal Entity 1

100001

Saving Account

40,000

SGD

Single

Customer 001

 

 

1

50,000

110,665

50,000

60,665  

Legal Entity 1

100002

Current Account

36,903

SGD

Single

Customer 001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

100003

Term Deposit

33,762

SGD

Single

Customer 001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

100004

Term Deposit

40,681

 USD

Single

Customer 001

 

 

 

-

40,681

-

40,681  

Legal Entity 1

100005

Saving Account

7,355

 SGD

Single

Customer 002

 

 

2

50,000

29,852.50

29,852.50

- 

Legal Entity 1

100006

Term Deposit

44,995

 SGD

Joint

Customer 002

Joint Account with Customer 003

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

100007

Term Deposit

44,995

SGD

Joint

Customer 003

Joint Account with Customer 002

 

3

50,000

22,497.50

22,497.50

- 

Legal Entity 1

100008

Saving Account

7,568

SGD

Single

Customer 004

 

 

4

50,000

44,773

44,773.00

- 

Legal Entity 1

100009

Saving Account

37,205

SGD

Sole proprietorship

Customer 004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

200100

Saving Account

29,451

SGD

Single

Customer 101

 

 

5

50,000

86,390

50,000

36,390  

Legal Entity 1

200101

Current Account

79,640

SGD

Joint

Customer 101

Joint Account with Customer 102

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

200102

Term Deposit

10,700

SGD

Joint

Customer 101

Joint Account with Customer 103

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

200103

Term Deposit

11,769

SGD

Sole proprietorship

Customer 101

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

200103

Term Deposit

79,640

SGD

Joint

Customer 102

Joint Account with Customer 101

 

6

50,000

39,820

39,820.00

- 

Legal Entity 2

100010

Saving Account

7,337

SGD

Single

Customer 005

 

 

7

50,000

7,337

7,337.00

- 

Legal Entity 3

100011

Term Deposit

45,016

SGD

Trust

Customer 005

 

For benefit of son

8

50,000

45,016

45,016.00

- 

Legal Entity 4

100012

Term Deposit

6,574

SGD

Trust

Customer 005

 

For benefit of daughter

9

50,000

6,574

6,574.00

- 

Legal Entity 5

100013

Saving Account

4,759

SGD

Trust

Customer 005

 

For benefit of spouse

10

50,000

4,759

4,759.00

- 

Legal Entity 6

100014

Saving Account

20,517

SGD

Company

Customer 008

 

Office Account

11

50,000

20,517

20,517.00

- 

Legal Entity 7

100015

Saving Account

24,254

SGD

Company

Customer 008

 

Client Account for Customer X

12

50,000

24,254

24,254.00

- 

Legal Entity 8

100016

Saving Account

68,691

SGD

Company

Customer 008

 

Client Account for Customer Y

13

50,000

68,691

50,000.00

18,691.00  

Legal Entity 9

100017

Saving Account

68,691

SGD

Single

Customer X

 

 

14

50,000

68,691

50,000.00

18,691.00  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Legal Entity 1

100018

Deposit

50,101

SGD

CPFIS

Customer 501

 

 

15

50,000

50,101

50,000.00

101.00  

Legal Entity 1

100019

Deposit

45,493

SGD

CPFRS

Customer 502

 

 

16

50,000

45,493

45,493.00

- 

Legal Entity 1

100020

Deposit

14,252

SGD

CPFRS

Customer 503

 

 

17

50000

64,590

50000

14590 

Legal Entity 1

100021

Deposit

50,338

SGD

CPFIS

Customer 503

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legal Entity 1

100022

Deposit

58,412

SGD

Single

Customer 504

 

 

18

50,000

58,412

50,000.00

8,412.00  

Legal Entity 1

100023

Deposit

10,700

SGD

CPFRS

Customer 504

 

 

19

50000

52,469

50000

2469 

Legal Entity 1

100024

Deposit

41,769

SGD

CPFIS

Customer 504

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Identifying Deposit Stability

After the insurance limit is allocated at an account level, the application determines the deposit stability as follows:

1.     Stable Deposits

A stable deposit is the portion of a deposit which is fully covered by deposit insurance provided by an effective deposit insurance scheme or a public guarantee that provides equivalent protection and which satisfies one of the following conditions:

a.     It is held in a transactional account by the depositor.

Or,

b.     The depositor has an established relationship with the reporting legal entity.

For MAS, if a deposit is partially covered by insurance and meets the other criteria, the insured portion of such deposits is considered stable while the uninsured portion is considered less stable.

Stable deposits receive a 5% Run-off rate unless they meet additional deposit criteria.

2.     Highly Stable Deposits

All stable deposits identified as per the criteria specified in point 1 above are classified as meeting additional insurance criteria if the insurance scheme under which they are covered satisfies the following conditions:

a.     It is based on a system of prefunding via the periodic collection of levies on banks with insured deposits.

b.     Has adequate means of ensuring ready access to additional funding in the event of a large call on its reserves, for example, an explicit and legally binding guarantee from the government, or a standing authority to borrow from the government.

c.     Access to insured deposits is available to depositors in a short period once the deposit insurance scheme is triggered.

Such deposits receive a 3% Run-off rate.

3.     Less Stable Deposits

All insured and uninsured deposit or funding balances that do not meet the stable deposits criteria are classified as less stable deposits: This includes the following:

a.     Insured balance of deposits meeting stable deposits criteria but denominated in ineligible foreign currencies.

b.     Uninsured balance of deposits meeting stable deposits criteria.

c.     Insured balance of deposits which are not transactional accounts and the customer has no established relationship with the bank.

d.     Deposit balance where the insurance coverage status is Uninsured.

Such deposits receive a 10% Run-off rate.

Identifying and Treating Pledged Deposits

A deposit is considered a pledged deposit when it is placed as a security against a loan or loans extended by the bank. It indicates that when a customer receives a loan from a bank and contractually places the deposits held within the same bank as collateral, then the bank marks the respective deposits as pledged deposits.

For pledged deposits, the pledged portion of the deposit proceeds is paid out only when the loan against the deposit is repaid in full. Multiple deposits can be placed against multiple liens, such as loans, line of credit, guarantees, and so on forming many-to-many relationships.

The outflows for pledged deposits which will not mature within the LCR horizon may be excluded from LCR calculation if the following conditions are met:

·        The loan will not mature or settle in the next 30 days.

·        The pledge arrangement is subject to a legally enforceable contract disallowing withdrawal of the deposit before the loan is fully settled or repaid.

·        The amount of deposit to be excluded cannot exceed the outstanding balance of the loan.

Topics:

·        Identification of Pledged Deposits 

·        Treatment of Pledged Deposits

Identifying Pledged Deposits

Pledged deposits are identified against deposits in the staging area by the lien marked indicator flag. The mapping between pledged deposits and the pledge against it is many-to-many and is a download for the application.

Treating Pledged Deposits

When all the guideline conditions are satisfied, the encumbered portion of pledged deposits is excluded and receives a 0% factor. The unencumbered portion of the pledged deposits is included and receives an appropriate Run-off rate as applicable.

To cater to pledged deposits, the following based measures are used in the business assumptions:

·        Unencumbered highly stable balance: This measure populates the portion of the highly stable amount, which is unencumbered.

·        Unencumbered stable balance: This measure populates the portion of a stable amount, which is unencumbered.

·        Unencumbered less stable balance: This measure populates the portion of the less stable amount, which is unencumbered.

·        Encumbered balance: This measure populates the encumbered amount of the deposit.

See Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions for details of the preseeded assumptions on pledged deposits.

Secured Funding

For Secured Accounts involving collateral placed or collateral received, there is an option to compute balances and cash flows in two granularities:

·        Account-level

·        Account-collateral level

This option enables the treatment of partially secured accounts and granular processing of an account with multiple collaterals. By default, secured funding computations happen at the account level for partially secured accounts. This can be changed to the Account-collateral level by updating the value of the SETUP_MASTER table entry for SEC_TRANS_TREATMENT_PURPOSE_VAL to YES.

Account-level

By default, all computations are done at the account level. This means that if multiple collaterals are securing an account, the collateral level information will be aggregated and processed at an account level.

Account-collateral level

Collateral level measures, such as the ones at the HQLA Asset level, encumbrance period, and so on, are computed at the account- collateral level. This means that if multiple collaterals are securing an account, the collateral level information is processed at the same account- collateral level without aggregating any data.

Classifying Operational Deposits

Operational deposits are those deposits placed by customers with a bank or balances kept by the bank with other financial institutions to meet their payment and settlement requirements and other operational requirements. The application classifies accounts as operational if they meet the following criteria:

1.     They are held in specifically designated accounts that are held as operational accounts, by the customers at the bank.

2.     They are priced without giving economic incentives to the customer to leave excess funds in the account.

3.     They arise out of a clearing, custody, or cash management relationship with the bank.

4.     They do not arise out of correspondent banking services or in the context of prime brokerage services.

5.     The termination of such agreements requires a minimum notice period of 30 days.

6.     If the agreement can be terminated within 30 days, the customer has to pay significant switching or termination costs to the bank.

Any excess balances held in an account classified as an operational deposit over and above that which is required to meet the operational requirements of the customer is assigned a higher outflow rate by the regulator. The application supports a methodology for computing the portion of the balance held for operational purposes which are truly required to meet the operational requirements of the customer. For details see Calculating Operational Amount.

Calculating Contractually Required Collateral

Contractually required collateral is the amount of collateral that is contractually due from one party to the other based on the current exposure and collateral position. This amount must be paid to the party soon and results in outflow for the party owing the collateral and inflow to the party to whom the collateral is due. It can be Contractually Due Collateral or Contractually Receivable Collateral based on the direction of the exposure:

·        Topics:

·        For Derivatives 

·        For Other Assets and Liabilities 

For Derivatives

This section details the calculation of contractually due collateral and contractually receivable collateral for derivatives.

Topics:

·        Calculating Contractually Due Collateral

·        Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral

Calculating Contractually Due Collateral

The application computes the value of the collateral that a bank is required to post contractually to its derivative counterparty as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If Secured Indicator is No, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

2.     If Secured Indicator is Yes and CSA Type is One way, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

3.     If Secured Indicator is Yes, CSA Type is Two way and Gross Exposure is greater than or equal to 0, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

4.     If Secured Indicator is Yes, CSA Type is Two way and Gross Exposure is less than 0, the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Contractually Due Collateral.

Where,

Threshold is the unsecured exposure that a party to a netting agreement is willing to assume before making collateral calls.

5.     If Secured Indicator = Yes, CSA Type = Two way and Gross Exposure is <0, then the application computes contractually due collateral for Non-Netted Derivatives as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the contractually due collateral for Non-netted Derivatives.

The contractually due collateral is assumed to be posted and therefore receives the relevant outflow rate specified by the regulator as part of the preconfigured business assumptions for LCR calculations.

Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral

The application computes the value of the collateral that a derivative counterparty is required to post contractually to the bank as per the following procedure:

1.     If Secured Indicator is No, then the contractually receivable collateral is 0. Otherwise,

2.     If Secured Indicator is Yes and Gross Exposure is less than or equal to 0, then the contractually receivable collateral is 0. Otherwise,

3.     If Secured Indicator is Yes and Gross Exposure is is greater than 0, then the application computes the contractually receivable collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the contractually receivable collateral.

The contractually receivable collateral does not receive a pre-specified inflow rate from the regulator and is, therefore, excluded from the LCR calculations. However, the application computes this to report.

For Other Assets and Liabilities

This section details the calculation of contractually due collateral and contractually receivable collateral for other assets and liabilities.

Topics:

·        Calculating Contractually Due Collateral 

·        Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral 

Calculating Contractually Due Collateral

The application calculates contractually due collateral for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

2.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

3.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the contractually due collateral.

Calculating Contractually Receivable Collateral

The application calculates contractually receivable collateral for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

2.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

3.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is Y then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the contractually receivable collateral.

Calculating Excess Collateral

Excess collateral is the value of collateral posted or received that is over the collateral required based on the current levels of exposure and collateral position. This amount can be withdrawn by the party which has provided the collateral over its exposure and results in outflow to the party holding the excess collateral and an inflow to the party who has provided the excess collateral. It can be Excess Collateral Due or Excess Collateral Receivable types.

Topics:

·        For Derivatives 

·        For Other Assets and Liabilities

For Derivatives

This section details the calculation of excess collateral due and excess collateral receivable for derivatives.

Topics:

·        Calculating Excess Collateral Due 

·        Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable

Calculating Excess Collateral Due

The application computes the value of the collateral that a derivative counterparty has posted to the bank, over the contractually required collateral, and therefore can be withdrawn by the counterparty, as follows:

1.     If Secured Indicator is No, then the excess collateral due is 0.

2.     If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are less than or equal to 0, the application computes the excess collateral due as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral due.

Where,

Adjusted collateral received: Collateral received from the counterparty less customer withdrawable collateral.

Customer withdrawable collateral: Collateral received under rehypothecation rights that can be contractually withdrawn by the customer within the LCR horizon without a significant penalty associated with such withdrawal.

3.     If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are greater than 0, the application computes the excess collateral due as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral due.

4.     If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are greater than 0, then the application computes excess collateral due for Non-Netted Derivatives as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral due for Non-Netted Derivatives.

The excess collateral due is assumed to be recalled by the counterparty and therefore receives the relevant outflow rate specified by the regulator as part of the preconfigured business assumptions for LCR calculations.

Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable

The application computes the value of the collateral that the bank has posted to its derivative counterparty, over the contractually required collateral, and therefore can be withdrawn by the bank, as follows:

1.     If Secured Indicator is No, then the excess collateral receivable is 0.

2.     If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are greater than or equal to 0, the application computes the excess collateral receivable as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral receivable.

Where,

Adjusted collateral posted: Collateral posted by the bank less firm withdrawable collateral.

Firm withdrawable collateral: Collateral provided under rehypothecation rights that can be contractually withdrawn by the bank within the LCR horizon without a significant penalty associated with such withdrawal.

3.     If Secured Indicator is Y and Gross Exposure are less than 0, the application computes the excess collateral receivable as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral receivable.

The excess collateral receivable does not receive a pre-specified inflow rate from the regulator and is, therefore, excluded from the LCR calculations. However, the application computes this to report.

For Other Assets and Liabilities

This section details the calculation of excess collateral due and excess collateral receivable for other assets and liabilities.

Topics

·        Calculating Excess Collateral Due 

·        Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable

Calculating Excess Collateral Due

The application calculates the excess collateral due for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

2.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

3.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral due.

Calculating Excess Collateral Receivable

The application calculates the excess collateral receivable for other assets and liabilities as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If Balance Sheet Category is Asset, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

2.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is N, then the contractually due collateral is 0.

3.     If Balance Sheet Category is Liability, and Secured Indicator is Y, then the application computes the contractually due collateral as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the excess collateral receivable.

Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount

This section details the calculation of downgrade impact amount for derivatives and other liabilities.

Topics:

·        Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Derivatives 

·        Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Other Liabilities 

Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Derivatives

The application calculates the downgrade impact amount for derivatives as follows, if one of the following conditions are met:

1.     If a downgrade trigger does not exist for the derivatives contract or netting agreement, the downgrade impact amount is 0.

2.     If Net Exposure greater than 0, the downgrade impact amount is 0.

3.     If Net Exposure less than or equal to 0, the downgrade impact amount is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the downgrade impact amount.

Calculating Downgrade Impact Amount for Other Liabilities

The application calculates the downgrade impact amount for other liabilities, including annuities, that have an associated downgrade, derivatives as follows, if one of the following conditions are met.

1.     If a downgrade trigger does not exist for the liability account, the downgrade impact amount is 0.

2.     The downgrade impact amount for liabilities other than derivatives and securitizations is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the downgrade impact amount.

NOTE:   

Any liability account that is triggered due to a particular level of rating downgrade has an outflow corresponding to a pre-specified percentage of the downgrade impact amount. For instance, if a 3-notch downgrade is specified, then the downgrade impact amount will outflow only for those accounts that have a trigger of 1-notch, 2-notches, and 3-notches. If a 2-notch downgrade is specified, then the downgrade impact amount will outflow only for those accounts that have a trigger of 1-notch and 2-notches. The rating downgrade and the outflow percentage as specified by the regulator are part of the preconfigured business assumptions for LCR calculations.

 

 

Calculating Net Derivative Cash Inflows and Outflows

This section provides info ration about calculating net derivative cash inflows and outflows.

Topics:

·        Cash Flow Netting at Derivative Contract Level 

·        Cash Flow Netting at Netting Agreement Level 

Cash Flow Netting at Derivative Contract Level

Cash flows from each derivative contract are netted as follows:

1.     When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in the same currency and occur at the same time bucket:

a.     The cash inflows and outflows are summed up and the net value is computed as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the net cash outflow.

b.     If the net cash flow is positive and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.

c.     If the net cash flow is negative and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.

2.     When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in different currencies but settle within the same day:

a.     The cash inflows and outflows are summed up after being converted to the reporting currency and the net value is computed.

b.     If the net cash flow is positive and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.

c.     If the net cash flow is negative and there is no netting agreement associated with the derivative contract, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.

3.     When cash inflows and outflows are denominated in different currencies and do not settle within the same day:

a.     The cash outflows from each derivative contract without an associated netting agreement are summed up and treated as net derivative cash outflows.

b.     The cash inflows from each derivative contract without an associated netting agreement are summed up and treated as net derivative cash inflow.

NOTE:   

If a derivative contract has a netting agreement associated with it, the cash flow is further netted across contracts at the netting agreement level.

 

Cash Flow Netting at Netting Agreement Level

For derivative contracts which have a netting agreement associated with them, the net cash flows computed at the derivative contract level are further netted across multiple contracts under the same netting agreement as follows:

1.     For derivative contracts, that belong to a single netting agreement, whose payment netting agreement flag is Yes:

a.     The cash inflows and outflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up across all contracts whose payment netting agreement flag is Yes, and the net value is computed.

b.     If the net cash flow is positive, the value is treated as net derivative cash outflow.

c.     If the net cash flow is negative, the value is treated as net derivative cash inflow.

2.     For derivative contracts, that belong to a single netting agreement, whose payment netting agreement flag is No:

a.     The cash outflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up separately for each derivative contract whose payment netting agreement flag is No, and treated as net derivative cash outflow.

b.     The cash inflows occurring in each time bucket, denominated in each currency, are summed up separately for each derivative contract whose payment netting agreement flag is No and treated as net derivative cash inflow.

NOTE:   

Cash flow netting for netting agreements is done separately for each currency. Cash flows are not netted across currencies, instead, the inflows and outflows converted into the reporting currency are summed up separately to report the net derivatives cash inflow and net derivatives cash outflow at an entity level.

 

Calculating Twenty-Four Month Look-back Amount

The application computes the 24-month look-back amount, to define outflows due to increased liquidity requirements related to market valuation changes on derivatives as follows:

·        The Mark-to-Market (MTM) value of collateral outflows and inflows due to valuation changes on derivative transactions are captured at a legal entity level. The values over a 24-month historical time window from the as of date are identified.

·        The application computes the largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow occurring within each rolling 30-day historical time window as follows:

a.     The net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within a particular 30-day historical time window as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the net Mark-to-Market collateral change.

b.     The cumulative net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within a particular 30-day historical time window as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the cumulative net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within a particular 30-day historical time window.

Where,

i: Each day within a particular 30-day historical time window.

n: Each 30-day historical time window.

c.     The absolute net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within the rolling 30-day historical time window as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the absolute net Mark-to-Market collateral change is computed for each day within the rolling 30-day historical time window.

d.     The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow occurring within the rolling 30-day historical time window is identified as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow occurring within the rolling 30-day historical time window.

NOTE:   

Steps (a) to (d) are repeated for each rolling 30-day historical time window.

 

 

3.     The 24-month look-back amount is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the 24-month look-back amount.

NOTE:   

1.      This calculation is done for each legal entity separately.

2.      The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow is computed in 30-day blocks on a rolling basis. For example, the first 30-day block is As of Date to As of Date - 29; the second 30-day block is As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30 and so on.

3.      The 24-month look-back amount is computed as the maximum of the largest absolute net collateral flow during all rolling 30-day periods in every 24 months.

 

 

The 24-month look-back calculations are illustrated in the following table, considering a 34-day historical time window instead of 24-months. This results in 5 rolling 30-day windows.

 

 Illustration: 24-month Look-back Calculation

Rolling 30-Day Period

Day

Mark-To-Market Collateral Outflows Due To Derivative Transaction Valuation Changes

(a)

Mark-To-Market Collateral Inflows Due To Derivative Transaction Valuation Changes

(b)

Net Mark-To-Market Collateral Change

(c = a – b)

Cumulative Net Mark-To-Market Collateral Change

(d = Cumulative c)

Absolute Net Mark-To-Market Collateral Change

[e = Abs (d)]

As of Date to As of Date - 29

As of Date

65

14

51

51

51 

As of Date - 1

65

9

56

107

107

As of Date - 2

74

83

-9

98

98

As of Date - 3

71

97

-26

72

72

As of Date - 4

84

89

-5

67

67

As of Date - 5

8

57

-49

18

18

As of Date - 6

40

59

-19

-1

1

As of Date - 7

42

87

-45

-46

46

As of Date - 8

100

6

94

48

48

As of Date - 9

41

30

11

59

59

As of Date - 10

45

9

36

95

95

As of Date - 11

9

32

-23

72

72

As of Date - 12

59

67

-8

64

64

As of Date - 13

61

10

51

115

115

As of Date - 14

22

36

-14

101

101

As of Date - 15

63

81

-18

83

83

As of Date - 16

36

3

33

116

116

As of Date - 17

61

22

39

155

155

As of Date - 18

94

37

57

212

212

As of Date - 19

3

18

-15

197

197

As of Date - 20

13

27

-14

183

183

As of Date - 21

24

56

-32

151

151

As of Date - 22

57

75

-18

133

133

As of Date - 23

66

87

-21

112

112

As of Date - 24

33

71

-38

74

74

As of Date - 25

29

30

-1

73

73

As of Date - 26

64

25

39

112

112

As of Date - 27

54

39

15

127

127

As of Date - 28

51

6

45

172

172

As of Date - 29

35

31

4

176

176

As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30

As of Date - 1

65

9

56

56

56

As of Date - 2

74

83

-9

47

47

As of Date - 3

71

97

-26

21

21

As of Date - 4

84

89

-5

16

16

As of Date - 5

8

57

-49

-33

33

As of Date - 6

40

59

-19

-52

52

As of Date - 7

42

87

-45

-97

97

As of Date - 8

100

6

94

-3

3

As of Date - 9

41

30

11

8

8

As of Date - 10

45

9

36

44

44

As of Date - 11

9

32

-23

21

21

As of Date - 12

59

67

-8

13

13

As of Date - 13

61

10

51

64

64

As of Date - 14

22

36

-14

50

50

As of Date - 15

63

81

-18

32

32

As of Date - 16

36

3

33

65

65

As of Date - 17

61

22

39

104

104

As of Date - 18

94

37

57

161

161

As of Date - 19

3

18

-15

146

146

As of Date - 20

13

27

-14

132

132

As of Date - 21

24

56

-32

100

100

As of Date - 22

57

75

-18

82

82

As of Date - 23

66

87

-21

61

61

As of Date - 24

33

71

-38

23

23

As of Date - 25

29

30

-1

22

22

As of Date - 26

64

25

39

61

61

As of Date - 27

54

39

15

76

76

As of Date - 28

51

6

45

121

121

As of Date - 29

35

31

4

125

125

As of Date - 30

93

68

25

150

150

As of Date - 2 to As of Date - 31

As of Date - 2

74

83

-9

-9

9

As of Date - 3

71

97

-26

-35

35

As of Date - 4

84

89

-5

-40

40

As of Date - 5

8

57

-49

-89

89

As of Date - 6

40

59

-19

-108

108

As of Date - 7

42

87

-45

-153

153

As of Date - 8

100

6

94

-59

59

As of Date - 9

41

30

11

-48

48

As of Date - 10

45

9

36

-12

12

As of Date - 11

9

32

-23

-35

35

As of Date - 12

59

67

-8

-43

43

As of Date - 13

61

10

51

8

8

As of Date - 14

22

36

-14

-6

6

As of Date - 15

63

81

-18

-24

24

As of Date - 16

36

3

33

9

9

As of Date - 17

61

22

39

48

48

As of Date - 18

94

37

57

105

105

As of Date - 19

3

18

-15

90

90

As of Date - 20

13

27

-14

76

76

As of Date - 21

24

56

-32

44

44

As of Date - 22

57

75

-18

26

26

As of Date - 23

66

87

-21

5

5

As of Date - 24

33

71

-38

-33

33

As of Date - 25

29

30

-1

-34

34

As of Date - 26

64

25

39

5

5

As of Date - 27

54

39

15

20

20

As of Date - 28

51

6

45

65

65

As of Date - 29

35

31

4

69

69

As of Date - 30

93

68

25

94

94

As of Date - 31

51

97

-46

48

48

As of Date - 3 to As of Date - 32

As of Date - 3

71

97

-26

-26

26

As of Date - 4

84

89

-5

-31

31

As of Date - 5

8

57

-49

-80

80

As of Date - 6

40

59

-19

-99

99

As of Date - 7

42

87

-45

-144

144

As of Date - 8

100

6

94

-50

50

As of Date - 9

41

30

11

-39

39

As of Date - 10

45

9

36

-3

3

As of Date - 11

9

32

-23

-26

26

As of Date - 12

59

67

-8

-34

34

As of Date - 13

61

10

51

17

17

As of Date - 14

22

36

-14

3

3

As of Date - 15

63

81

-18

-15

15

As of Date - 16

36

3

33

18

18

As of Date - 17

61

22

39

57

57

As of Date - 18

94

37

57

114

114

As of Date - 19

3

18

-15

99

99

As of Date - 20

13

27

-14

85

85

As of Date - 21

24

56

-32

53

53

As of Date - 22

57

75

-18

35

35

As of Date - 23

66

87

-21

14

14

As of Date - 24

33

71

-38

-24

24

As of Date - 25

29

30

-1

-25

25

As of Date - 26

64

25

39

14

14

As of Date - 27

54

39

15

29

29

As of Date - 28

51

6

45

74

74

As of Date - 29

35

31

4

78

78

As of Date - 30

93

68

25

103

103

As of Date - 31

51

97

-46

57

57

As of Date - 32

12

31

-19

38

38

As of Date - 4 to As of Date - 33

As of Date - 4

84

89

-5

-5

5

As of Date - 5

8

57

-49

-54

54

As of Date - 6

40

59

-19

-73

73

As of Date - 7

42

87

-45

-118

118

As of Date - 8

100

6

94

-24

24

As of Date - 9

41

30

11

-13

13

As of Date - 10

45

9

36

23

23

As of Date - 11

9

32

-23

0

0

As of Date - 12

59

67

-8

-8

8

As of Date - 13

61

10

51

43

43

As of Date - 14

22

36

-14

29

29

As of Date - 15

63

81

-18

11

11

As of Date - 16

36

3

33

44

44

As of Date - 17

61

22

39

83

83

As of Date - 18

94

37

57

140

140

As of Date - 19

3

18

-15

125

125

As of Date - 20

13

27

-14

111

111

As of Date - 21

24

56

-32

79

79

As of Date - 22

57

75

-18

61

61

As of Date - 23

66

87

-21

40

40

As of Date - 24

33

71

-38

2

2

As of Date - 25

29

30

-1

1

1

As of Date - 26

64

25

39

40

40

As of Date - 27

54

39

15

55

55

As of Date - 28

51

6

45

100

100

As of Date - 29

35

31

4

104

104

As of Date - 30

93

68

25

129

129

As of Date - 31

51

97

-46

83

83

As of Date - 32

12

31

-19

64

64

As of Date - 33

34

36

-2

62

62

 

The largest 30-day absolute net collateral flow for each rolling 30-day period and the 24-month look-back value (in this example, the 34-day look-back value) are computed as follows:

 

 Illustration continued: 24-month Look-back Calculation

Rolling 30-Day Period

Largest 30-Day Absolute Net Collateral Flow

[f = Max (e)]

24 Month Look-back Value

[Max (f)]

As of Date to As of Date - 29

212

212 

As of Date - 1 to As of Date - 30

161

As of Date - 2 to As of Date - 31

153

As of Date - 3 to As of Date - 32

144

As of Date - 4 to As of Date - 33

140

 

Calculating Operational Amount

The regulator-prescribed lower outflow rate for operational deposits should be applied only to the portion of the EOP balance that is truly held to meet operational requirements. The application supports a new methodology to compute the operational portion of the EOP balance of operational deposits. The following steps are involved in computing the operational balance:

1.     All deposits classified as operational as per regulatory guidelines are identified. This is a separate process in LRM.

2.     The EOP balances of eligible operational accounts are obtained over a 90-day historical window including the As of Date. For example, As of Date – 89 days. To identify historical observations, the f_reporting_flag must be updated as Y for one execution of the Run per day in the LRM Run Management Execution Summary UI. The application looks up the balance for such accounts against the Run execution for which the Reporting Flag is updated as Y for each day in the past.

NOTE:   

The historical time window is captured as a parameter in the SETUP_MASTER table. The default value is 90 days which can be modified by the user. To modify this value. Update the value under the component code DAYS_HIST_OPER_BAL_CALC_UPD

 

3.     A rolling 5-day average is calculated for each account over the historical window.

4.     The average of the 5-day rolling averages computed in Step 3 is calculated.

5.     The operational balance is calculated as follows:

NOTE:   

The calculation of the operational balance can be either a direct download from the staging tables or through the historical balance approach.

 

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the operational balance.

NOTE:   

The operational balance calculation based on historical lookback is optional. You can choose to compute the operational balances using this method or provide the value as a download. To provide the value as a download, update the value in the SETUP_MASTER table under the component code HIST_OPERATIONAL_BAL_CALC_UPD as N. If the value is ‘Y’ then the value would be calculated through historical balance approach.

 

6.     The non-operational balance is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the non-operational balance.

7.     The operational insured balance is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the operational insured balance.

The insured and uninsured balances are calculated as part of a separate process, for example, the insurance allocation process, which is explained in detail in the relevant section under each jurisdiction.

8.     The operational uninsured balance is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the operational uninsured balance.

9.     The non-operational insured balance is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the non-operational insured balance.

10.  The non-operational uninsured balance is calculated as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the non-operational uninsured balance.

The operational deposit computation process is illustrated as follows assuming a 15-day historical window instead of 90-days and for the as of date 28th February 2017. The historical balances for 15-days including the as of date are as follows.

 

Illustration - Operational Deposit Computation

Clients With Operational Accounts

Eligible Operational Accounts

Historical Time Window

As of Date

2/14/2017

2/15/2017

2/16/2017

2/17/2017

2/18/2017

2/19/2017

2/20/2017

2/21/2017

2/22/2017

2/23/2017

2/24/2017

2/25/2017

2/26/2017

2/27/2017

2/28/2017

A 

10001 

102,000 

102,125 

102,250 

102,375 

102,500 

102,625 

102,750 

102,875 

103,000 

103,125 

103,250 

103,375 

103,500 

103,625 

103,750 

10296

23,500

23,550

23,600

23,650

23,700

23,750

23,800

23,850

23,900

23,950

24,000

24,050

24,100

24,150

24,200

B

31652

65,877

59,259

59,234

59,209

59,184

59,159

59,134

59,109

59,084

59,059

59,034

59,009

58,984

58,959

58,934

 

The rolling averages and cumulative average are computed as follows.

 

Illustration - Rolling Average and Cumulative Average Computation

Clients with Operational Accounts

Eligible Operational Accounts

5-day Rolling Average

Cumulative Average

(a)

2/18/2017

2/19/2017

2/20/2017

2/21/2017

2/22/2017

2/23/2017

2/24/2017

2/25/2017

2/26/2017

2/27/2017

2/28/2017

A 

10001 

102,250 

102,375 

102,500 

102,625 

102,750 

102,875 

103,000 

103,125 

103,250 

103,375 

103,500 

95136 

 

10296

23,600

23,650

23,700

23,750

23,800

23,850

23,900

23,950

24,000

24,050

24,100

22721

B

31652

60,553

59,209

59,184

59,159

59,134

59,109

59,084

59,059

59,034

59,009

58,984

56931

 

The operational and non-operational balances are computed as follows.

 

 Illustration - Operational and Non-operational Balances Computation

Clients with Operational Accounts

Eligible Operational Accounts

Current Balance

(b)

Operational Balance

(c = a – b)

Non-Operational Balance

Insured Balance

Uninsured Balance

Insured Operational Balance

Uninsured Operational Balance

Insured Non-Operational Balance

Uninsured Non-Operational Balance

A

10001 

103,750 

95,136 

8,615 

100,000 

3,750 

95,136 

 

4,865 

3,750 

10296

24,200

22,721

1,480

 

24,200

 

22,721

 

1,480

B

31652

58,934

56,931

2,003

58,934

 

56,931

 

2,003

 

 

NOTE:   

·        Negative historical balances are replaced by zero for this computation.

·        For operational accounts that have an account start date is greater than or equal to historical days including the as of date, missing balances are replaced by previously available balance.

·        For operational accounts that have an account start date is less than the historical days including the as of date:

1.      Missing balances between the account start date and as of date are replaced by previously available balance.

2.      The rolling average is calculated only for the period from the account start date to the as of date.

·        The methodology to compute operational balance is optional. This can be turned On or Off using the SETUP_MASTER table, where component code is equal to HIST_OPERATIONAL_BAL_CALC_UPD. The option to provide the operational balance as a download is supported by the application.

 

Calculating HQLA Transferability Restriction

Regulators across jurisdictions recognize the existence of liquidity transfer restrictions, for banks that operate in multiple jurisdictions. Such transfer restrictions have implications for the group-wide consolidated LCR calculations and hence must be treated appropriately. In the LCR consolidation process, OFS LRRCMAS includes the restricted HQLA from a subsidiary in the consolidated stock of HQLA only to the extent of that subsidiary’s liquidity requirements such as its net cash outflow, per the regulatory requirements. The treatment of transferability restriction during consolidation is as follows:

1.     The net cash outflows are computed for a subsidiary, on a consolidated basis. The consolidation entity is the subsidiary itself in this case. If the subsidiary is a leaf level entity, then the net cash outflow is calculated on a standalone basis.

2.     The restricted and unrestricted stock of Level 1, Level 2A and Level 2B is computed for the subsidiary on a consolidated basis. OFS LRM captures the HQLA transferability restriction at an account level through the flag F_TRANSFERABILITY_RESTRICTION.

3.     The application checks whether the stock of restricted Level 1 assets are greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted Level 1 assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1. If no, the entire stock of restricted Level 1 assets are included in the consolidated calculations.

4.     The application checks whether the sum of stock of restricted Level 1 and Level 2A assets is greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted Level 2A assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1 less stock of restricted Level 1 asset. If no, the entire stock of restricted Level 2A assets are included in the consolidated calculations.

5.     The application checks whether the sum of stock of restricted Level 1, Level 2A and Level 2B assets is greater than the net cash outflows. If yes, it includes the stock of restricted Level 2B assets in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA up to the extent of its net cash outflows computed as part of step 1 less stock of restricted Level 1 and Level 2A assets. If no, the entire stock of restricted Level 2B assets is included in the consolidated calculations.

6.     The unrestricted Level 1, 2A, and 2B assets are included fully in the calculation of its immediate parent entity’s stock of HQLA.

7.     Steps 1 to 6 are repeated for each sub-consolidation level within the organization structure of the consolidation entity until the consolidation entity itself.

NOTE:   

1.      The allocation of restricted assets is done in the descending order of asset quality to maximize the stock of HQLA.

2.      This calculation is part of the LCR consolidation process. To get a complete view of the process, see Consolidation, where the consolidation process is described.

 

Calculating Net Cash Outflows

The net cash outflows are computed after applying the scenario specified by the user, as a set of business assumptions, to the contractual cash flows. The process of computing the net cash outflows is as follows:

1.     Calculation of Total Cash Inflows

The application applies the business assumptions, specified on products involving cash inflows, selected as part of the Run. The regulatory assumptions specified in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions section are predefined and packaged as part of the ready-to-use Run to determine the inflows over the liquidity horizon. The business assumption adjusted cash inflows occurring over the liquidity horizon are summed up to obtain the total cash inflow. These include inflows from earning assets such as loans, assets that are not eligible for inclusion in the stock of HQLA, derivatives inflows, and so on.

2.     Calculation of Total Cash Outflows

The application applies the business assumptions, specified on products involving cash outflows, selected as part of the Run. The regulatory assumptions specified in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions section are predefined and packaged as part of the ready-to-use Run to determine the outflows over the liquidity horizon. The business assumption adjusted cash outflows occurring over the liquidity horizon is summed up to obtain the total cash outflow. These include outflows from liabilities, derivatives outflows, outflows due to changes in financial conditions such as rating downgrade and valuation changes, and so on.

3.     Calculation of Net Cash Outflow

Net cash outflow is computed as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the net cash outflow.

Consolidation

The approach to consolidation as per LCR approach followed by OFS LRRCMAS is as follows:

a.     Identification and Treatment of Unconsolidated Subsidiary

The application assesses whether a subsidiary is to be consolidated or not by checking the regulatory consolidated flag F_REGULATORY_ENTITY_IND against each legal entity. The application consolidates the cash inflows and outflows of a subsidiary and computes the consolidated LCR, only if the subsidiary is a regulatory consolidated subsidiary. If the entity is an unconsolidated subsidiary, the cash inflows and outflows from the operations of such subsidiaries are ignored (unless otherwise specifically included in the denominator of LCR per regulations) and only the equity investment in such subsidiaries is considered as the bank’s asset and appropriately taken into the numerator or denominator based on the asset level classification.

For instance, legal entity 1 has 3 subsidiaries, legal entity 2, legal entity 3, and legal entity 4. The regulatory consolidated flag F_REGULATORY_ENTITY_IND for legal entity 4 is ‘No’. In this case, legal entity 4 is treated as a third party for consolidation and its assets and cash flows are completely excluded from calculations. Legal entity 1’s interest in legal entity 4 including common equity of legal entity 4 and assets and liabilities where legal entity 4 is the counterparty will not be eliminated as legal entity 4 is considered a third-party during consolidation.

b.     HQLA Consolidation by Subsidiary Type

The process of consolidating HQLA differs slightly based on whether the subsidiary is a material entity that is expected to report LCR separately from the parent or not. This is done to ensure consistency in the results when consolidating at a parent level and when calculating the LCR at the material subsidiary level as well. The methods followed for consolidating HQLA are:

For material subsidiaries subject to individual LCR requirements, consolidation is done as follows:

    The application identifies whether the subsidiary is a consolidated subsidiary.

    If condition (a) is fulfilled, it identifies whether the consolidated subsidiary is subject to LCR requirement that is, whether the subsidiary in question is a regulated entity.

    If condition (b) is fulfilled, then it calculates the net cash outflow by eliminating all the inter-branch transactions at each country level of the consolidated subsidiary. If the consolidated subsidiary has operations in three countries, then the transaction between all the branches lying in the same country are eliminated. The application consolidates post-haircut restricted HQLA to the extent of the consolidated subsidiary’s net cash outflow that is, to the extent required to satisfy minimum LCR requirements of that subsidiary as part of the covered company’s HQLA. Restricted HQLA are the assets that have a restriction on their transferability to the parent entity or are the assets that are denominated in non-convertible currencies.

    It consolidates the entire amount of post-haircut unrestricted HQLA held at the consolidated subsidiary as part of the covered company’s HQLA.

    It consolidates all cash inflows and outflows which are part of the net cash flow calculation.

For subsidiaries not subject to individual LCR requirements, consolidation is done as follows:

    The application identifies whether the subsidiary is a consolidated subsidiary.

    If condition (a) is fulfilled, it identifies whether the consolidated subsidiary is subject to minimum LCR requirement that is, whether the subsidiary in question is a regulated entity.

    If condition (b) is not fulfilled, it eliminates all inter-company transactions to the level of the immediate parent of the consolidated subsidiary and then calculates the net cash outflow.

    The application consolidates post-haircut restricted HQLA to the extent of the consolidated subsidiary’s net cash outflow and the entire amount of post-haircut unrestricted HQLA as part of the covered company’s HQLA.

    It consolidates all cash inflows and outflows which are part of the net cash flow calculation.

c.     Consolidated LCR Calculation

Consolidation is done on a step by step basis based on each level of the organization structure starting from the most granular level. This indicates that intercompany transactions are eliminated at each sub-consolidation level till the final level of the consolidation (generally BHC) is reached. The consolidated HQLA calculated at the level of the immediate subsidiary of the BHC is added to the HQLA held by the BHC. All intercompany cash flows are eliminated and the LCR is calculated per the LCR approach.

For instance, a bank’s organizational structure is as follows:

Figure 1: Banks Organization Structure

This illustration shows the organization structure of a bank.

In this case, at the first level of consolidation, calculation of net cash outflows and HQLA is done on a solo basis for legal entities 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 as they do not have any subsidiaries. For regulated entities, such as material entities, intercompany transactions are not eliminated; whereas for non-regulated entities, intercompany transactions are eliminated to the next level of consolidation that is, legal entities 3 and 5. The restricted HQLA from entities 6 and 7 are consolidated to the extent of their net cash outflows, while the unrestricted HQLA is transferred fully to legal entity 3. The cash inflows and outflows are consolidated to the full extent.

At the second level of consolidation that is, legal entity 3, intercompany transactions are eliminated till legal entity 1, if LE 3 is a non-regulated entity. The HQLA is calculated as a sum of the consolidated restricted and unrestricted HQLA of entities 6 and 7 and the HQLA of legal entity 3. The net cash outflow is calculated based on the cash flows of entities 3, 6, and 7, post-elimination of intercompany transactions if applicable. The consolidated HQLA is calculated based on the procedure detailed in Step 2 above.

This process continues in a step-by-step manner until the highest parent level, which is the bank holding company in this example.

Calculating Liquidity Coverage Ratio

The liquidity coverage ratio is calculated for a legal entity on both solo and consolidated basis. The formula for calculating the liquidity coverage ratio is as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the LCR.

Significant Currency Liquidity Coverage Ratio Calculation

The liquidity coverage ratio is also calculated for each legal entity at the level of each significant currency to identify potential currency mismatches. This is done by first identifying significant currencies for a legal entity, at a solo or consolidated level as specified in the Run, as follows:

This illustration shows the formula to calculate the Significant Currency.

The application further computes and reports the stock of HQLA, net cash outflows, and LCR for each currency identified as significant in the manner detailed in the earlier sections. This calculation is done on both a solo and consolidated basis.

Preconfigured Regulatory LCR Scenario

OFS LRRCMAS supports a ready-to-use MAS LCR which has the regulatory scenario with associated HQLA haircuts, inflow, and outflow percentage or rates preconfigured in the form of business assumptions. This section explains the business assumptions and the corresponding regulatory reference.

NOTE:   

This section provides only contextual information about business assumptions. For more detailed information, see the OFS LRS application (UI). For detailed processes and tasks, see the Run Chart.

 

The following table lists the Document Identifiers provided in the Regulatory Reference column of the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions and Regulations Addressed through Business Rules  sections. 

 

Document Identifiers for Regulatory References

Regulation Reference Number

Document Number

Document Name

Issued Date

MC

MAS Notice 649

MAS Notice 649  Minimum Liquid Assets and Liquidity Coverage Ratio 

28 Nov 14 

 

SDIC

SDIC

24 Aug 18

 

The list of preconfigured business Rules and assumptions as well as the corresponding reference to the regulatory requirement that it addresses are provided in the tables listed in the Regulations Addressed through Business Assumptions and Regulations Addressed through Business Rules  sections.


Topics:

·        Regulation Addressed through Business Rules

·        Regulation Addressed through Business Assumptions

Regulation Addressed through Business Rules

The application supports multiple preconfigured rules and scenarios based on MAS specified scenario parameters such as inflow rates, outflow rates, Run-offs, haircuts, and so on.

 

 Preconfigured LCR Business Rules

Sl. No.

Rule Name

Rule Description

Regulatory Requirement Addressed

Regulatory Reference

MAS Notice 649 Minimum Liquid Assets and Liquidity Coverage Ratio

 1

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 1 - Cash, Central Bank Reserves and Sukuk

This rule reclassifies cash, central bank reserves and undrawn portion of committed facilities that foreign bank branches have received from its head office, reserves and Sukuk issued by Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd as HQLA Level 1 assets per the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of cash, central bank reserves, and Sukuk issued by Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level 1 asset is configured as part of this rule. Additionally, it classifies the undrawn portion of committed facilities that foreign bank branches have received from its head office as HQLA Level 1 asset.

Paragraph 21 (a)
Paragraph 21 (b)
Paragraph 21 (c) 

 2

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 1 - Sovereign, Central Bank, and MDB Issued Zero Risk Weight Securities

This rule reclassifies marketable zero risk weight securities, issued by sovereigns, central banks, public sector enterprises, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank, European Community, and Multilateral Development Banks as HQLA Level 1 assets, per the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of marketable zero risk weight securities, issued by sovereigns, central banks, public sector enterprises, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank, European Community, and Multilateral Development Banks as HQLA Level 1 assets are configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (d) 

 3

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 1 - Sovereign, Central Bank, and MDB Guaranteed Zero Risk Weight Securities

This rule reclassifies marketable zero risk weight securities, guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, public sector enterprises, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank, European Community, and Multilateral Development Banks as HQLA Level 1 assets, per the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of marketable zero risk weight securities, guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, public sector enterprises, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, Bank for International Settlements, International Monetary Fund, European Central Bank, European Community, and Multilateral Development Banks as HQLA Level 1 assets are configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (d)

 4

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 1 - Sovereign and Central Bank  Non-Zero Risk Weight Securities

This rule reclassifies non-zero risk weight securities issued by foreign sovereigns and central banks as HQLA Level 1 assets, per the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of marketable securities, issued by non-zero risk weight foreign sovereigns and central banks as HQLA Level 1 assets is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (g)
Paragraph 21 (h)

 5

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2A - Debt Securities

This rule reclassifies 20 percent risk-weighted securities issued or guaranteed by sovereigns, central banks, PSEs, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, and MDBs as HQLA Level 2A assets, per the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of twenty percent risk-weighted marketable securities either issued or guaranteed by foreign sovereigns, central banks, public sector enterprises, regional governments, municipalities, state agencies, state enterprises, and Multilateral Development Banks as HQLA Level 2A assets are configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (e)

 6

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2A -Corporate Debt Securities, Sukuk

This rule reclassifies debt securities rated >=AA- issued by non-financial corporates, covered bonds and Sukuk issued by  other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level 2A assets.

 The classification of >=AA- rated debt securities issued by non-financial corporates, covered bonds and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level 2A assets is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (i)

 7

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2B(I) Asset

This rule reclassifies corporate debt securities rated A+ to A-, issued by non-financial corporates, and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd.  As HQLA Level 2A assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of A+ to A-rated debt securities issued by non-financial corporates and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (j)

 8

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2B(II) non-RMBS Asset - Corporate Dept Securities

This rule reclassifies debt securities rated BBB+ and BBB-, issued by specialized sovereigns, central banks, non-financial corporates, and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of BBB+ and BBB- rated debt securities issued by sovereigns; central banks; non-financial corporates and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule. Additionally, the classification of BBB+ and BBB- rated debt securities guaranteed by sovereigns and central banks

Paragraph 21 (f)
Paragraph 21 (k)

 9

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2B(II) non-RMBS Asset - Shares

This rule reclassifies equities issued by non-financial entities as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of common equities issued by non-financial entities as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (m)

 10

LRM - MAS - HQLA Level 2B(II) RMBS Asset

This rule reclassifies residential mortgage-backed securities of >= AA, without any restructured underlying, as HQLA Level 2B assets in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The classification of >= AA rated residential mortgage-backed securities without any restructured underlying as HQLA Level 2B(II) RMBS assets is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 21 (l)

 11

LRM - MAS - Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Deduction

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a non-Level 1 HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the amount paid. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is a non-Level 1 HQLA and the collateral posted in a Level 1 HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted.

The identification of secured funding and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of Level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 5

 12

LRM - MAS - Level 1 Stock Adjustment - Addition

This rule identifies all secured funding and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured funding transactions, where the collateral posted is a non-Level 1 HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the amount received. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral posted is a non-Level 1 HQLA and the collateral received in a Level 1 HQLA the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral received.

The identification of secured lending and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of Level 1 assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 6

 13

LRM - MAS - Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Deduction

This rule identifies all secured funding and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured funding transactions, where the collateral posted is a Level 2A HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a Level 2A asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted.

The identification of secured lending and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of Level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 7

 14

LRM - MAS - Level 2A Stock Adjustment - Addition

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. For secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a Level 2A HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral received. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral posted is an HQLA and the collateral received is a Level 2A asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral received.

The identification of secured funding and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of Level 2A assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 8

 15

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(I) Stock Adjustment - Deduction

This rule identifies all secured funding and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured funding transactions, where the collateral posted is a Level 2B(I) HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a Level 2B(I) asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted.

The identification of secured lending and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of Level 2B(I) assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 9

 16

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(I) Stock Adjustment - Addition

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. For secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a Level 2B HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral received. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral posted is an HQLA and the collateral received is a Level 2B asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral received.

The identification of secured funding and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of Level 2B(I) assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 10

 17

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(II) RMBS Stock Adjustment - Deduction

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a Level 2B(II) RMBS HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral received. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral posted is an HQLA and the collateral received is a Level 2B(II) RMBS asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral received.

The identification of secured lending and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of Level 2B(II) RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 11

 18

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(II) RMBS Stock Adjustment - Addition

This rule identifies all secured funding and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured funding transactions, where the collateral posted is a Level 2B(II) RMBS HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral posted. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a Level 2B(II) RMBS asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral posted.

The identification of secured funding and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of Level 2B(II) RMBS  assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 12

 19

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Stock Adjustment - Deduction

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral received. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral posted is an HQLA and the collateral received is a Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral received.

The identification of secured lending and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be deducted from the stock of Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 13

 20

LRM - MAS - Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS Stock Adjustment - Addition

This rule identifies all secured funding and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured funding transactions, where the collateral posted is a Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral posted. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is an HQLA and the collateral posted is a Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS asset, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the addition of the collateral posted.

The identification of secured funding and asset exchange transactions required to be unwound and the amount to be added to the stock of Level 2B(II) Non-RMBS assets due to such an unwind is configured as part of this rule.

Appendix 6 Paragraph 14

 21

LRM - MAS - Bank Own Assets - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update

This rule reclassifies corporate debt securities rated A+ to A-, issued by non-financial corporates, and Sukuk issued by institutions other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. As HQLA Level 2A assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The identification of whether an asset owned by the bank meets the operational requirements set forth by MAS for its inclusion in the stock of HQLA is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 22

 22

LRM - MAS - Mitigants - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update

This rule reclassifies debt securities rated BBB+ and BBB-, issued by specialized sovereigns, central banks, non-financial corporates, and Sukuk issued by other than Singapore Sukuk Pte Ltd. as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The identification of whether the collateral received from counterparty meets the operational requirements set forth by MAS is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 22

 23

LRM - MAS - Re-hypothecated Mitigants - Meets HQLA Operational Requirements Flag Update

This rule reclassifies equities issued by non-financial entities as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets as HQLA Level (II) non-RMBS assets, in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The identification of whether collateral received from a counterparty, that is further placed as collateral, meets the operational requirements set forth by MAS on unwinding is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 22

 24

LRM - MAS - Instruments - Eligible High-Quality Liquid Assets Flag Update

This rule reclassifies residential mortgage-backed securities of >= AA, without any restructured underlying, as HQLA Level 2B assets in accordance with the criteria specified by MAS.

The identification of whether a bank's asset classified as an HQLA, meets all the operational criteria and is therefore eligible to be included in the stock of HQLA is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 22

 25

LRM - MAS - Mitigants - Eligible High-Quality Liquid Assets Flag Update

This rule identifies all secured lending and asset exchange transactions involving HQLA that mature within the LCR horizon which are, therefore, required to be unwound and reclassifies them to the appropriate adjustment rule. In case of secured lending transactions, where the collateral received is a non-Level 1 HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the amount paid. In case of asset exchange transactions, where the collateral received is a non-Level 1 HQLA and the collateral posted in a Level 1 HQLA, the type of adjustment to the stock of HQLA due to such an unwind is updated as the deduction of the collateral posted.

The identification of whether the collateral received from the counterparty, classified as an HQLA, meets all the operational criteria and is therefore eligible to be included in the stock of HQLA is configured as part of this rule.

Paragraph 22

 

Regulation Addressed through Business Assumptions

The application supports multiple assumptions with preconfigured rules and scenarios based on regulator specified scenario parameters such as HQLA haircuts, inflow and outflow percentage/rates, and so on. The list of preconfigured business assumptions and the corresponding reference to the regulatory requirement that it addresses is provided in the following table.

 

Preconfigured LCR Business Assumptions

Sl. No.

Business Assumption Name

Business Assumption Description

Regulatory Requirement Addressed

Regulatory Reference

MAS Notice 649 Minimum Liquid Assets and Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Inflow

1

MAS-Secured lending inflows where the collateral is not reused

Inflows from secured lending transactions, where the collateral received are not reused to cover the customer or firm short positions.

The inflow rate on secured lending transactions where the collateral received is not reused to cover customer or firm short positions, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies 0%, 15%, 25%, 50% and 100% inflow rate when collateral received is Level 1, Level 2A, Level 2B(I), Level 2B(II) RMBS, Level 2B(II) non-RMBS and non-HQLA respectively, on the secured balance per collateral (that is, used a portion of Collateral) for secured lending transactions specified earlier.

Paragraph 92 

2

MAS-Secured lending inflow where collateral reused for <=30d

Inflows from secured lending transactions, where the collateral received are reused to cover the customer or firm short positions for a period less than the LCR horizon.

The inflow rate on secured lending transactions where the collateral received is reused to cover customer or firm short positions, for a period less than the LCR horizon, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies 0%, 15%, 25%, 50% and 100% inflow rate when collateral received is Level 1, Level 2A, Level 2B(I), Level 2B(II) RMBS, Level 2B(II) non-RMBS and non-HQLA respectively, on the secured balance per collateral (that is, used a portion of Collateral) for secured lending transactions specified earlier.

Paragraph 92

3

MAS-Secured lending inflow where collateral reused for >30d

Inflows from secured lending transactions, where the collateral received are reused to cover the customer or firm short positions for a period greater than the LCR horizon.

The inflow rate on secured lending transactions where the collateral received is reused to cover customer or firm short positions for a period more than the LCR horizon, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow rate on the secured balance per collateral (that is, used a portion of Collateral) for secured lending transactions specified earlier.

Paragraph 93

4

MAS-Drawdowns on Committed Funding Facilities

Drawdowns on committed facilities received by the bank.

The inflow rate on the undrawn amount available for drawdown, on the committed credit, liquidity, and other contingent funding facilities received by the bank, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow rate on the credit and liquidity lines received by the bank.

Paragraph 99

5

MAS-Inflows from fully performing loans

Inflows from fully performing loans, which have a specified maturity and are extended to retail customers, SMEs, non-financial Corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, PSEs, and central banks.

The inflow rate on the fully performing loans and leases is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 50 % inflow (that is 50% rollover) on cash flows occurring within the LCR horizon from loans and leases extended to retail customers, SMEs, Sovereigns, MDBs, PSEs, and non-financial corporate. Additionally, it applies a 100% inflow (that is 0% rollover) on cash flow occurring within the LCR horizon from loans and leases extended to the central bank.

Paragraphs 102 and 103

6

MAS-Other entity inflows from fully performing loans

Inflows from fully performing loans, which have a specified maturity and are extended to wholesale customers other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, PSEs, and central banks.

The inflow rate on the fully performing loans and leases is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 50 % inflow (that is 50% rollover) on cash flows occurring within the LCR horizon from loans and leases extended to non-financial entities apart from corporates. Additionally, it applies 100% inflow (that is 0% rollover) on cash flow occurring within the LCR horizon from loans and leases extended to financial entities.

Paragraph 103

7

MAS-Inflows from deposits placed at financial entities

Inflows from deposits held with other financial institutions and deposits held with the centralized institution of a cooperative banking network.

The inflow rate on deposits placed at banks or financial entities is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow (that is 100% rollover) on cash flows from deposits placed with other financial institutions and deposits placed with the centralized institution of a cooperative banking network.

Paragraphs 105 and 108

8

MAS-Open maturity loan minimum payment inflows

Inflows due to minimum payments received within the LCR horizon on open maturity loans.

The inflow rate on the minimum payments that are contractually due within the LCR horizon, on an open maturity loan, credit cards, overdrafts, leases, or line of credits is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on such a minimum amount of dues to the central bank and financial customers. Additionally, it applies a 50% inflow on minimum amount dues to retail and non-financial customers.

Paragraph 101

9

MAS-Revolving, non-maturity, non-performing inflow exclusion

Exclusion of inflows from revolving products, products that do not have a specified maturity, and products that are not fully performing.

The exclusion of cash inflows from revolving assets, assets that do not have a stated maturity, and assets that are not fully performing are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% inflow (that is 100% rollover) on the principal inflows from open maturity fully performing assets. Additionally, it applies a 0% inflow (that is 100% rollover) on the inflows from non-performing assets.

Paragraph 100

10

MAS-Non-HQLA security inflows

Inflows from securities not included in the stock of HQLA.

The inflow rate on the performing debt securities that are excluded from the stock of HQLA is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow (that is 0% rollover) on cash flows from securities classified as Other Assets, and securities classified as HQLA but do not meet the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the stock of HQLA. It also applies a 0% inflow (that is 100% rollover) on non-performing securities or securities that are classified as HQLA and meet the criteria for inclusion in the stock of HQLA, to avoid double counting.

Paragraph 104

11

MAS-Inflow from intra-group transactions

Inflows from net intra-group transactions.

Inflows from net intra-group transactions are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow if the netted value of cash flows at the group level is positive. Another assumption, MAS-Outflow from intra-group transactions, applies a 100% outflow if the netted value of cash flows at the group level is negative.

Paragraph 106

12

MAS-Derivative cash inflows

Net cash outflows from derivative transactions.

The inflow rate on the 30-day cash inflows from derivative transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% inflow on derivative cash inflows, on a net basis in case of derivatives, which are part of a netting agreement, and on a non-net basis for other derivatives.

Paragraph 107

13

MAS-Funding loss inflow on structured financing Instruments

Inflows from loss of funding on asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments.

The Run-off rate on the maturing asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the EOP Balance Net of Underlying HQLA for structured financing instruments that mature within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 71 and 108

Outflow

14

MAS-Highly Stable retail deposits Run-off

Run-offs on the highly stable portion of deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail.

The outflow rate on the highly stable portion of deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 3% Run-off on the highly stable portion of retail deposits that are either not encumbered, or the encumbrance period is less than LCR horizon, which either mature or results in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 40,  55 and Footnote 15

15

MAS-Unencumbered part of highly stable retail deposit runoff

Run-offs on the unencumbered less stable portion of deposits from retail customers, and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail, that has encumbrance period beyond the LCR horizon.

The outflow rate on the unencumbered portion of stable deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 3% Run-off on the unencumbered portion of the stable deposit, having encumbrance period more than LCR horizon, which either mature or results in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 40, 55 and Footnote 15

16

MAS-Stable retail deposits Run-off

Run-offs on the stable portion of deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail.

The outflow rate on the stable portion of deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 5% Run-off on the stable portion of retail deposits that are either not encumbered, or encumbrance period is less than the LCR horizon, which either mature or results in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 40, 45 and 55

17

MAS-Unencumbered part of stable retail deposit Run-off

Run-offs on the unencumbered stable portion of deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail.

The outflow rate on the unencumbered portion of stable deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for the purpose of LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 5% Run-off on the unencumbered portion of stable deposits, having encumbrance period more than the LCR horizon, which either mature or results in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 40, 45 and 55

18

MAS-Less Stable retail deposits Run-off

Run-offs on the less stable portion of deposits from retail customers and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail, that is either not pledged, or have encumbrance period within the LCR horizon.

The outflow rate on the less stable portion of deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for the purpose of LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 10% Run-off on the less stable portion of retail deposits that are either not encumbered, or encumbrance period is less than the LCR horizon, which either mature or result in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 39, 40, 45 and 55

19

MAS-Unencumbered part of less stable retail deposit Run-off

Run-offs on the unencumbered less stable portion of deposits from retail customers, and unsecured wholesale funding from SMEs treated as retail, that has encumbrance period beyond the LCR horizon.

The outflow rate on the unencumbered portion of less stable deposits, from retail customers and SMEs treated as retail customers, for the purpose of LCR, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 10% Run-off on the unencumbered portion of the less stable deposit, having encumbrance period more than the LCR horizon, which either mature or results in early withdrawal, without incurring a significant penalty, within the LCR horizon.

Paragraphs 37, 39, 40, 45 and 55

20

MAS-Insured operational balance Run-off

Run-offs on the portion of operational balances from deposits generated by clearing, custody, and cash management activities that are fully covered by deposit insurance.

The Run-off rates on the insured portion of the balance held in operational accounts to fulfill operational requirements are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 3% Run-off on insured operational balances that meet the additional criteria for deposit insurance schemes and a 5% Run-off on those that do not meet the additional criteria.

Paragraph 46 to 52

21

MAS-Uninsured operational balance Run-off

Run-offs on the portion of operational balances from deposits generated by clearing, custody, and cash management activities that are not covered by deposit insurance.

The Run-off rates on the uninsured portion of the balance held in operational accounts to fulfill operational requirements are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 25% Run-off on operational balances that are not covered by deposit insurance.

Paragraph 46 to 52

22

MAS- Deposits in institutional network of Co-op banks Run-off

Run-offs on deposits placed with the central institutions, or specialized central service providers of an institutional network of co-operative banks due to statutory minimum deposit requirements, or in the context of common task sharing and legal, statutory or contractual arrangements.

The Run-off rates on deposits placed by a member institution with the central institution or specialized central service providers of an institutional network of co-operative banks are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 75% rollover that is a 25% Run-off on deposits in institutional networks of cooperative banks, which are non-operational in nature, placed due to statutory minimum deposit requirements or in the context of common task sharing and legal, statutory or contractual arrangements.

Paragraph 53 to 54

23

MAS-Outflows from correspondent banking

Outflows from deposits arising out of correspondent banking relationship.

The Run-off rates from Vostro balances are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the EOP balance.

Paragraph 54

24

MAS-Outflows on unsecured non-operational funding

Run-offs on the unsecured wholesale funding, provided by SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, that are not classified as operational deposits.

The Run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding that are not classified as operational deposits, received from SME's and non-financial corporates treated as wholesale customers, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an 80% rollover that is 20% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding accounts that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 60% rollover that is 40% Run-off on those non-operational funding accounts that are not fully covered by deposit insurance.

Paragraph 56

25

MAS-Outflows on non-operational part of operational account

Run-offs on unsecured wholesale funding, from wholesale customers other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, provided for non-operational

The Run-off rates on the non-operational portion of operational deposits from non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 20% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are fully covered by deposit insurance and a 40% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits that are not fully covered by deposit insurance.

Paragraph 56

26

MAS-Other legal entity unsecured wholesale funding Run-off

Run-offs on unsecured wholesale funding, from wholesale customers other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, provided for non-operational purposes.

The Run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding, that not classified as operational deposits, received from all financial counterparties other than SME's and non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% rollover that is 100% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding.

Paragraph 57

27

MAS-Co-operative Bank unsecured wholesale funding Run-off

Run-offs on unsecured wholesale funding from credit co-operative banks provided for non-operational purposes.

The Run-off rates on the cash flows, from unsecured funding, that not classified as operational deposits, received from credit co-operative banks are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 0% rollover that is 100% Run-off on cash flows from non-operational funding.

Paragraph 57

28

MAS-Run-off on the nonoperational balance of other entities

Run-offs on the non-operational portion of unsecured wholesale funding provided by customers other than SMEs, non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs that are classified as operational deposits.

The Run-off rates on the non-operational portion of operational deposits received from all financial counterparties other than SME's and non-financial corporates, sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the non-operational portion of operational deposits.

Paragraph 57

29

MAS-Runoff from issued debt security

Outflows on debt securities issued by the bank itself.

The Run-off rates on the debt securities issued by the bank itself are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 90% rollover that is 10% Run-off on issued securities that are sold exclusively in the retail market and held in retail accounts, and 0% rollover that is 100% Run-off on all other issued securities.

Paragraph 58

30

MAS-Outflow from intra-group transactions

Outflows from net intra-group transactions

Outflows from net intra-group transactions are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies 100% outflow if the netted value of cash flows at the group level is negative. Another assumption, MAS-Inflow from intra-group transactions applies 100% inflow if the netted value of cash flows at the group level is positive.

Paragraph 57

31

MAS-Secured funding Run-off

Run-offs on secured funding, excluding collateral swaps.

The Run-off rates on the secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory Run-offs applicable to each counterparty type in the form of rollover rates that is 1 – Run-off rates.

Paragraphs 60 to 69

32

MAS-Secured funding Run-off from other legal entities

Run-off on secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from counterparties other than sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs where the transaction is backed by Level 2B(I), Level 2B(II) non-RMBS or other assets.

The Run-off rates on the secured funding, excluding collateral swaps, received from counterparties other than sovereigns, central banks, multilateral development banks, and PSEs, where the transaction is backed by Level 2B(I), Level 2B(II) non-RMBS or other assets, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory Run-offs applicable to other counterparties, based on the asset quality of the placed collateral, in the form of rollover rates that is 1 – Run-off rates.

Paragraphs 60 to 69

33

MAS-Outflows from deliverable derivatives

Outflows from derivatives with physical delivery settlement.

The outflow rate on the 30-day cash outflows from derivative transactions that are physically delivered is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory Run-offs applicable to other counterparties, based on the asset quality of the delivered assets, in the form of rollover rates that is 1 – Run-off rates.

Paragraphs 60 to 64

34

MAS-Deliverable derivatives outflows from other entities

Outflows from derivatives, with the physical delivery settlement, from all counterparties other than sovereigns, MDBs and PSEs.

The outflow rate on the 30-day cash outflows from derivative transactions that are physically delivered is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the regulatory Run-offs applicable to counterparties other than sovereigns, MDB and PSE, based on the asset quality of the delivered assets, in the form of rollover rates that is 1 – Run-off rates.

Paragraphs 60 to 64

35

MAS-Derivative cash outflows

Net cash outflows from derivative transactions.

The outflow rate on the 30-day cash outflows from derivative transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on derivatives cash outflows, on a net basis in case of derivatives which are part of a netting agreement and on a non-net basis for other derivatives.

Paragraph 64

36

MAS-Rating downgrade related collateral outflow

Increased liquidity needs arising from the requirement to post additional collateral due to a 3-notch rating downgrade.

The outflow rate, on the additional collateral required to be posted on contracts with downgrade triggers, due to a 3-notch rating downgrade, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the downgrade impact amount arising from a 3-notch rating downgrade.

Paragraph 65

37

MAS-Rehypothecation rights lost due to rating downgrade

Increased liquidity needs arising from a loss of rehypothecation rights on assets received as collateral due to a 3-notch rating downgrade.

The outflow rate, on the additional cash outflows arising on contracts with downgrade triggers, resulting in a loss of rehypothecation rights due to a 3-notch rating downgrade, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of mitigants received under rehypothecation rights corresponding to accounts whose downgrade trigger is activated due to the 3-notch ratings downgrade.

Paragraph 65

38

MAS-Increased liquidity needs due to collateral value change

Increased liquidity needs arising from the potential change in the value of a posted collateral.

The outflow rate on the additional cash outflow due to a potential loss in the market value of non-Level 1 assets posted as collateral is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of non-Level 1 posted collateral computed after netting the non-Level 1 collateral received under rehypothecation rights on the same transaction.

Paragraph 66

39

MAS-Outflow of excess collateral

Increased liquidity needs arising from excess non-segregated collateral received that can be recalled by the counterparty.

The outflow rate on the excess unsegregated collateral held by a bank, which can potentially be withdrawn by the counterparty, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of excess collateral.

Paragraph 67

40

MAS-Outflow of contractually due collateral

Increased liquidity needs arising from collaterals that are contractually required to be posted to the counterparty but have not yet been posted.

The outflow rate on the collateral that the bank is contractually required to post to its counterparty, but has not yet posted, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the value of contractually due collateral.

Paragraph 68

41

MAS-Outflows from substitutable collateral

Increased liquidity needs arising from contracts that allow a counterparty to substitute lower quality collateral for the current higher quality collateral.

The outflow rate on the collateral that the counterparty can contractually substitute with lower quality collateral is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies an outflow rate equal to the difference between the liquidity haircuts of collateral that can be potentially substituted by the counterparty and the collateral that substitutes it.

Paragraph 69

42

MAS-Increased liquidity need due to market valuation change

Increased liquidity needs arising from market valuation changes on derivatives and other transactions.

The outflow rate on the collateral outflows occurring due to market valuation changes on derivatives and other transactions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow rate on the largest absolute net 30-day collateral flow occurring during the preceding 24 months under the historical look-back approach.

Paragraph 70

43

MAS-Loss of Funding on Structured Financing Instruments

Loss of funding on asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments.

The Run-off rate on the maturing asset-backed securities, covered bonds, and other structured financing instruments, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the EOP Balance Net of Underlying HQLA for structured financing instruments that mature within the LCR horizon.

Paragraph 71

44

MAS-Loss of Funding from Financing Facility-Liquidity Draws

Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial papers, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities due to drawdown of liquidity facilities provided by the bank.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the liquidity facility extended to the structured financing facility is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow as a drawdown rate on the liquidity facilities extended as support for structured financing purposes.

Paragraph 72

45

MAS-Loss of Funding from Financing Facility-Maturing debt

Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial papers, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities due to the inability to refinance the maturing debt.

The Run-off rate on the maturing amounts of asset-backed commercial papers, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the EOP balance of the structured financing facilities that mature within the LCR horizon.

Paragraph 72

46

MAS-Loss of Funding from Financing Facility-Return of assets

Loss of funding on asset-backed commercial papers, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities due to potential return of assets.

The Run-off rate on the returnable assets underlying asset-backed commercial papers, conduits, securities investment vehicles, and other such financing facilities is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% Run-off on the value of the assets that are returnable within the LCR horizon.

Paragraph 72

47

MAS-Draws on committed credit and liquidity facilities

Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to retail customers, SMEs, non-financial corporates and PSEs, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, and banks excluding SPEs.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to retail customers, non-financial corporates and PSEs, sovereigns, central banks, and MDBs is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, based on the counterparty type, for the aforementioned counterparties.

Paragraphs 73 to 79

48

MAS-Draws on committed facility to other FI, legal entity

Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to entities other than retail customers, SMEs, non-financial corporates and PSEs, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, PSEs, and banks excluding SPEs. Additionally, drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to hedge funds, money market funds, and SPEs.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers other than retail customers, non-financial corporates and PSEs, sovereigns, central banks, MDBs, hedge funds, mutual funds, SPEs, and banks is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, based on the counterparty type.

Paragraphs 73 to 79

49

Draws on committed credit and liquidity facility by bank

Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to banks excluding SPEs.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, for banks excluding SPEs.

Paragraphs 73 to 79

50

MAS-Draws on facility to hedge and money market fund, SPE

Drawdowns on committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to hedge funds, money market funds, and SPEs.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the committed credit and liquidity facilities extended to hedge funds, mutual funds, and SPEs, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the relevant outflow as a drawdown rate, based on the counterparty type.

Paragraph 77

51

MAS-Other contractual obligation to financial institution

Outflows related to other contractual obligations to extend funds within 30 days to financial institutions.

The outflow rate on other contractual obligations to extend funds to financial institutions, not covered in the previous assumptions, is predefined as part of this business assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow rate on such contractual obligations.

Paragraph 80

52

MAS-Other contractual obligation to nonfinancial institution

Outflows related to other contractual obligations to extend funds within 30 days to retail and non-financial wholesale counterparties.

The outflow rate on the other contractual obligations to extend funds to retail and non-financial corporate customers, in excess of 50% of contractual inflows from such customers within the LCR horizon, is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on the excess contractual obligation amount.

Paragraph 81

53

MAS-Other contractual obligation outflows

Outflows related to trade finance related instruments.

The outflow rate on guarantees, letters of credit, and bills of exchange are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 3% Run-off on such instruments when used for the trade finance whereas 100% Run-off is applied if used for the non-trade finance-related obligation.

Paragraphs 82 to 88

54

MAS-Uncommitted Facility Outflows

Drawdowns on uncommitted credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers.

The outflow rate on the undrawn amount available to be drawn down on the uncommitted credit and liquidity facilities extended to customers is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% drawdown on the uncommitted facilities.

Paragraphs 82 to 88

55

MAS-Outflows Related to Short Positions

Outflows related to customer and bank short positions.

The outflow rate on the short positions is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption specifies Run-off rates on the short positions based on assets covering such short positions.

Paragraphs 82 to 88

56

MAS-Non-contractual obligation outflows

Outflows from non-contractual obligations related to joint ventures, minority investments, debt buy-back requests, structured products, managed funds, and any other similar obligations.

The outflow rate on the non-contractual obligations related to joint ventures, minority investments, debt buy-back requests, structured products, managed funds, and any other similar obligations is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow rate on the non-contractual obligations.

Paragraphs 82 to 88

57

MAS-Contractual interest payment outflows

Outflows related to contractual payments of interests.

The outflow rate on the interest payments contractually due within the LCR horizon is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on interest in the form of a 0% rollover rate.

Paragraph 89

58

MAS-Contractual dividend payment outflows

Outflows related to contractual payments of dividends.

The outflow rate on the dividends payable within the LCR horizon is predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies a 100% outflow on dividends payable.

Paragraph 89

Collateral Swap

59

MAS-Outflows from collateral swaps

Outflows from collateral swap transactions.

The outflow rates on collateral swaps are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the outflows applicable to the market value of received collateral when the collateral placed under a swap transaction is of lower or equal quality than the collateral received, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the placed and received collateral.

Paragraphs 60 to 63

60

MAS-Collateral swap inflows where collateral is not reused

Inflows from collateral swap transactions where the collateral received are not reused to cover customer or firm short positions.

The inflow rates on collateral swaps where the collateral received are not reused to cover customer or firm short positions, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the inflows applicable to the market value of placed collateral, when the collateral placed under a swap transaction is of higher or equal quality than the collateral received, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the placed and received collateral.

Paragraph 92

61

MAS-Collateral swap inflow where collateral reused for <=30d

Inflows from collateral swap transactions where the collateral received are reused to cover customer or firm short positions for a period less than the LCR horizon.

The inflow rates on collateral swaps where the collateral received are reused to cover customer or firm short positions for a period less than the LCR horizon, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the inflows applicable to the market value of placed collateral, when the collateral placed under a swap transaction is of higher or equal quality than the collateral received, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the placed and received collateral.

Paragraph 92

62

MAS-Collateral swap inflow where collateral reused for >30d

Inflows from collateral swap transactions where the collateral received are reused to cover customer or firm short positions for a period greater than the LCR horizon.

The inflow rates on collateral swaps where the collateral received are reused to cover customer or firm short positions for a period more than LCR horizon, are predefined as part of this assumption. This assumption applies the inflows applicable to the market value of placed collateral, when the collateral placed under a swap transaction is of higher or equal quality than the collateral received, as the difference between the liquidity haircuts applicable to the placed and received collateral.

Paragraph 93