Agent Prompt: Benchmark Job 289 against Job 286

Agent Response:
Job 289 took 9.53 minutes, which is 0.19 minutes faster than Job 286.

Job Id: 289, 286
POV: FY24:Dec:Actual:Working, FY24:Sep:Actual:Working
Execution Time: 9.53 Minutes, 9.72 Minutes
Model: 10 Actuals Allocation Process, 10 Actuals Allocation Process
Concurrent Calc Threads: 1, 1
Essbase Clear Type: logical, logical
Allocation Rule Non-Empty Tuple: false, false
Scratch Cells Optimization: true, true
Skip Scripts Optimization: false, false
Number of Cells Updated: 958656, 0
Number of Parallel Jobs: 13, 13

No differences were found in the compared metrics between Job 289 and Job 286.