Scenario: Reversal Includes Previously Reversed Distributions
In this example, you'll see how distributions that have been manually reversed and reassigned are included again for reversal due to a change in the ownership definition.
Consider a $1,000 transaction distributed using the following ownership percentages:
| Stakeholder | Ownership Percentage | Distribution |
|---|---|---|
| Stakeholder 1 | 45 | 450 |
| Stakeholder 2 (Managing partner) | 55 | 550 |
Stakeholder 1 disputed the invoice created from the $450 distribution. The joint venture accountant manually reversed the distribution and reassigned it to stakeholder 3, who agreed to absorb the amount. The reversed distribution was processed to create a credit memo, and the reassigned distribution was invoiced to stakeholder 3.
The following table illustrates the newly created reversed and reassigned distributions.
| Stakeholder | Distribution | Distribution Line Type |
|---|---|---|
| Stakeholder 1 | 450 | Canceled |
| Stakeholder 1 | -450 | Reversed |
| Stakeholder 3 | 450 | Reassigned |
Later, the ownership percentages were revised as follows:
| Stakeholder | Ownership Percentage |
|---|---|
| Stakeholder 1 | 35 |
| Stakeholder 2 | 65 |
This requires distributions to be reversed and the transaction redistributed using the revised ownership percentages. Stakeholder 3 was only involved through reassignment and isn’t included in either the original or revised ownership definition. However, the reassigned distribution for stakeholder 3 is still reversed and redistributed using stakeholder 1’s revised ownership percentage, as illustrated in the following table:
| Stakeholder | Distribution | Distribution Line Type |
|---|---|---|
| Stakeholder 3 | 450 | Canceled |
| Stakeholder 3 | -450 | Reversed |
| Stakeholder 3 | 350 | Redistributed |