Designing SA Types For Service Provider Financial Settlements
As explained in Service Providers Have Service Agreements Too, We Bill For Them and They Bill For Us service providers require a service agreement. You must create SA types for these types of service agreements. The following points provide a few suggestions that will help you design these financial settlement SA types:
Service type should probably be a non-service oriented service type.
Distribution code for We Bill For Them settlement SAs should be a payable account (or treat it as a "contra" receivable. Refer to Receivable Segmentation for more information.
The sub SA switch should be turned off.
Start options are not allowed.
The payment distribution and late payment information should be set up as for any SA type. Refer to Cash Distribution Segmentation and Late Payment Charge Segmentation for more information.
Special role should not be used.
Deposit class should be used if the settlement service agreement is covered by a deposit. This would probably only be used for They Bill For Us service providers (because they will owe us money).
The one time charge switch should be off.
These service agreements are not billable and therefore none of the billing information should be specified.
The characteristic premise switch should be off.
Rates should not be used.
Service points should not be used.
Adjustment types profiles should be set up accordingly.
Debt class, write off debt class, and severance criteria should be set up accordingly.
Billable charge templates should not be used.
Completion algorithms should not be used.
Freeze algorithms should not be used.
Refer to Setting Up SA Types for how to set up these new SA types in the system.