Skip Headers

Oracle® Web Conferencing Administrator's Guide
Release 2 (2.0.4)

Part Number B10877-01
Go to Documentation Home
Home
Go to Book List
Book List
Go to Table of Contents
Contents
Go to Index
Index
Go to Master Index
Master Index
Go to Feedback page
Feedback

Go to previous page
Previous
Go to next page
Next
View PDF

3
Planning for Deployment

3.1 Overview

This chapter highlights the factors to consider when deploying Oracle Web Conferencing. The issues range from sizing guidelines to firewall issues to topology considerations for an enterprise that is geographically distributed.

3.2 Distributed Deployment Considerations

3.2.1 Web Conferencing Issues

Given the intrinsic nature of Oracle Web Conferencing functionality where data from one user's desktop is distributed to other end-user desktops, there could be latency issues for end-users, depending on their location. Oracle Web Conferencing, by itself, cannot address the network latency issues. You must resolve these issues through other mechanisms.

In environments in which users are geographically dispersed, a deployment with a single set of Real-Time Collaboration Core Components instances is not optimal for preventing network latency issues. Instead, consider the following scenarios:

Scenario 1--If there are a lot of conferences where most of the attendees are in the same geographical region, then Oracle Corporation recommends deploying a set of Real-Time Collaboration Core Components instances in that geographical region.

Example: A company has multiple divisions all over the world, and each division's employees have a lot of conferences with each other, and, sometimes, they have conferences with employees from other divisions that are in different locations.

In such a scenario, it does not make sense to force users to use a Real-Time Collaboration cluster in a different location, thereby causing network latency problems for users. Each location could have its own set of Real-Time Collaboration Core Components instances.

Scenario 2--If attendees of most conferences are in different regions, then having a set of Real-Time Collaboration Core Components instances in each geographical region does not help.

Example: A US-based company has outsourced its sales/support organization to a site in India. If a typical conference involves a sales agent from the site in India and a customer in the US, then there is no reason to deploy Real-Time Collaboration Core Components instances in the India site.

3.2.2 Voice Conversion Server Issues

You should deploy Voice Conversion Servers in areas where they are able to successfully dial in to all conference numbers that will be used. In view of phone charges, it might be beneficial to deploy a Voice Conversion Server in the region where most calls terminate. For example, if a significantly large number of Web Conferencing users dial out to a particular region like the United Kingdom, it would be beneficial to have a Voice Conversion Server deployed in the UK instead of using a Voice Conversion Server in the United States to dial the UK numbers.

3.3 Sizing Guidelines

See the Oracle Web Conferencing Sizing Guide to determine the hardware required to set up Web Conferencing for your specific needs.

3.4 Internet/Intranet Considerations

All typical firewall considerations for Web-based applications (Real-Time Collaboration Core Components in DMZ listening on port 80 for HTTP and port 443 for HTTPS, Real-Time Collaboration Repository behind the inner firewall, Oracle9iAS Infrastructure behind the inner firewall) apply when deploying Web Conferencing. Additional requirements for Web Conferencing follow:

3.5 LBR Considerations

Figure 3-1 Geographically Distributed Deployment Using LBRs

Text description of dist_lbr.gif follows.

Text description of the illustration dist_lbr.gif

For geographically distributed deployment, you can use load balancers (LBR) to leverage the Real-Time Collaboration clustering support.