Examples of Performance Process Flows
You create process flows that are referenced by performance templates to create specific evaluations.
These examples show how to use process flows for some common review situations.
Creating a Process Flow for an Annual Review
Big Computers Company has an annual evaluation for all employees. Company policy requires these items for performance evaluation:
-
Employees and managers collaborate on adding content to the performance document.
-
Both workers and managers are required to rate the worker.
-
Managers are required to request and receive participant feedback from at least two sources to evaluate the worker as part of the 360-degree evaluation.
When the manager and worker complete the evaluation, company policy requires this sequence of events:
-
The manager must seek approval for the completed performance document.
-
After the document is approved, managers must conduct a formal meeting with the worker to discuss the evaluation, which the worker must acknowledge.
-
After the meeting, the worker can comment on the performance evaluation or the process, which the manager can then reply to.
Big Computers Company plans to change the default names of the tasks and subtasks to reflect the company's terms.
The tasks and subtasks in this table show the process flow Big Computers Company uses to create the performance documents for their annual review.
Task Order |
Default Task Name |
New Task Name |
Default Subtask Name |
New Subtask Name |
Roles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 |
Set Goals |
Set Competencies and Goals |
N/A |
N/A |
Worker Manager |
20 |
Worker Self-Evaluation |
N/A |
Subtask 1: Track Worker Self-Evaluation Subtask 2: Worker Self-Evaluation |
Subtask 1: Track Employee Evaluation Subtask 2: Evaluate Yourself |
Subtask 1: Manager Subtask 2: Worker |
30 |
Manager Evaluates Worker |
Evaluate Employee |
N/A |
N/A |
Manager |
40 |
Manage Participant Feedback |
Request Feedback |
N/A |
N/A |
Manager |
50 |
First Approval |
Approve Evaluation |
N/A |
N/A |
Manager |
60 |
Confirm Review Meeting Held |
N/A |
Subtask 1: Conduct Meeting Subtask 2: Worker Acknowledges Review Meeting |
Subtask 1: Confirm Meeting Subtask 2: Acknowledge Meeting |
Subtask 1: Manager Subtask 2: Worker |
70 |
Provide Final Feedback |
N/A |
Subtask 1: Worker Provides Final Feedback Subtask 2: Manager Provides Final Feedback |
Subtask 1: Provide Feedback to Manager Subtask 2: Provide Final Feedback |
Subtask 1: Worker Subtask 2: Manager |
Create a Process Flow for a Project Review
The company has a special project for a group of workers to deliver a new module within six months for their existing mobile application to beat a competitor. Big Computers Company wants to perform a simplified review of the workers who worked on this important project. The workers are also subject to the annual performance evaluation in a few months.
For the project review, these guidelines apply:
-
Managers provide all the goals and the reviews as part of the Manager Evaluates Worker task.
-
Workers aren't required to provide any goals or perform a self-evaluation on the project. The company wants workers to focus on their work responsibilities, not the evaluation process.
-
Manager evaluations must be approved.
-
Managers must share the documents with the workers because the workers are required to acknowledge that they reviewed the manager ratings.
-
No meetings are required, since those can be combined with the meetings following the annual review.
-
Big Computers Company keeps the default names of the tasks and subtasks.
The following table shows the tasks, along with who performs them, and the order that's required to create the process flow.
Task Order |
Task |
Subtask |
Roles |
---|---|---|---|
10 |
Manager Evaluates Worker |
N/A |
Manager |
20 |
First Approval |
N/A |
Manager |
30 |
Share Performance Document |
Subtask 1: Share Performance Document Subtask 2: Worker Acknowledges Document |
Subtask 1: Manager Subtask 2: Worker |