Usecase Example: Pillar Two
Pillar Two Total at parent ties to children even when children have different pillar-two FX rates.
Note:
Pillar Two works the same way as Current provision, but in Pillar Two you must ensure that your members are in the same Pillar Two jurisdiction.See the sample Pillar Two Assignment:
Pillar Two Total
- PillarTwoCA
- PillarTwoCA3
Both PillarTwoCA and PillarTwoCA3 are under Pillar Two jurisdiction (PILLAR_TWO_CA).
- FX Rates PillarTwoCA

PillarTwoCA FX rates are 0.55 (Ending Rate) and 0.5 (Average Rate).
- FX Rates PillarTwoCA3

PillarTwoCA3 FX rates are 0.55 (Ending Rate) and 0.7 (Average Rate).
Note:
PillarTwoCA3 has a FX rate of .7 (overridden) instead of .5. - Child Entity PillarTwoCA PillarTwo Currency

Child 1 entity PillarTwoCA PillarTwo entity currency is 43,680.
- Child Entity PillarTwoCA USD Reporting

Translated (USD) value is 21840 (43,680*.5=21840)
- Child Entity PillarTwoCA3 Pillar Two Currency

Entity PillarTwoCA3 PillarTwo currency is 150.
- Child Entity PillarTwoCA3 USD Reporting

Translated (USD) value is 105 (150*.5=105).
- Parent Entity Total Pillar Two Currency

Total Pillar Two currency is 43830.
- Parent Entity Total Pillar Two USD Reporting

Child contributions translated to USD:
- PillarTwoCA → USD = 21840
- PillarTwoCA3 → USD = 105
This ensures parent totals reflect child-level rate differences even when parent translation is not directly derived from entity-level translation.