10.2.1 Equivalence of the OAS and Risk-Adjusted Margin

In a no-arbitrage economy with complete markets, the market value at time t of an instrument with cash flow rate C(t) is given by:

Equation 13

Figure 10-14 Equation 13


This image displays the Equation 13.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 13 follows and expectation is taken concerning the risk-neutral measure. The expected change in value is given by:

Equation 14

Figure 10-15 Equation 14


This image displays the Equation 14.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 14 follows:

The variation in value is therefore equal to the expected value of the change dV plus the change in the value of a martingale M in the risk-neutral measure:

Equation 15

Figure 10-16 Equation 15


This image displays the Equation 15.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 15 follows:

Let I be the market value of the money market account in which cash flows are reinvested.

Equation 16

Figure 10-17 Equation 16


This image displays the Equation 16.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 16 follows:

Note that unlike V this is a process of finite variation. By Ito's lemma.

Equation 17

Figure 10-18 Equation 17


This image displays the Equation 17.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 17 follows:

Let S be the market value of a portfolio composed of the instrument plus the money market account. We have:

Equation 18

Figure 10-19 Equation 18


This image displays Equation 18.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 18 follows:

In other terms, the portfolio (and not the instrument) earns the risk-free rate of return. An alternate representation of this process is:

Equation 19

Figure 10-20 Equation 19


This image displays Equation 19.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 19 follows:

Where N is another martingale in the risk-neutral measure. The expected value of the portfolio is then:

Equation 20

Figure 10-21 Equation 20


This image displays Equation 20.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 20 follows:

Where

<N,N>

is the quadratic variation of N. This is equivalent to:

Equation 21

Figure 10-22 Equation 21


This image displays Equation 21.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 21 follows:

Let us define the martingale:

Equation 22

Figure 10-23 Equation 22


This image displays Equation 22.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 22 follows:

This represents the relative risk of the portfolio for the standard money market account, that is, the account where only an initial investment of V(0) is made. Then:

Equation 23

Figure 10-24 Equation 23


This image displays Equation 23.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 23 follows:

In other terms, the expected future value of the portfolio is equal to the expected future value of the money market account adjusted by the correlation between the standard money market account and the relative risk. Assuming complete and efficient markets, banks can fully hedge their balance sheet against this relative risk, which should be neglected to calculate the contribution of a particular portfolio to the profitability of the balance sheet. Therefore:

Equation 24

Figure 10-25 Equation 24


This image displays Equation 24.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 24 follows:

Equation 25

Figure 10-26 Equation 25


This image displays Equation 25.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 25 follows:

In this example, the risk-adjusted rate of return of the bank on its portfolio is equal to the risk-free rate of return.

Let us suppose now that another instrument offers cash flows

C'>C

Assuming complete and efficient markets its market value will then be:

Equation 26

Figure 10-27 Equation 26


This image displays Equation 26.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 26 follows:

The value of the corresponding portfolio is denoted by

S'>S

By analogy with the previous development, we have:

Equation 27

Figure 10-28 Equation 27


This image displays Equation 27.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 27 follows:

Again, the risk-adjusted rate of return of the bank on its portfolio is equal to the risk-free rate of return. Suppose now that markets are not complete and inefficient. The bank pays the value V(0) and receives cash flows equal to C'. We have:

Equation 28

Figure 10-29 Equation 28


This image displays Equation 28.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 28 follows:

By definition of the total risk-adjusted return, we have:

Equation 29

Figure 10-30 Equation 29


This image displays Equation 29.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 29 follows:

Therefore, by analogy with the previous development.

Equation 30

Figure 10-31 Equation 30


This image displays Equation 30.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 30 follows:

This can be decomposed into:

Equation 31

Figure 10-32 Equation 31


This image displays Equation 31.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 31 follows:

Equation 32

Figure 10-33 Equation 32


This image displays Equation 32.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 32 follows:

Equation 33

Figure 10-34 Equation 33


This image displays Equation 33.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 33 follows:

The solution of Equation 31 and Equation 33 is:

Equation 34

Figure 10-35 Equation 34


This image displays Equation 34.

Description of solution for the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 31 and 33 follows:

By the law of large numbers, Equation 31 and Equation33 result in:

Equation 35

Figure 10-36 Equation 35


This image displays Equation 35.

Description of the Transfer Pricing Option Cost Equation 35 follows:

For example, the OAS is equal to the risk-adjusted margin.