Over/Under Cash Drawer Segmentation
In order to balance a tender control that is out-of-balance, your organization must set up an account with a contract whose contract type references the over/under expense account. You will probably only have one contract that references this contract type, but you still must have it if you remit funds via a cash drawer.
Fastpath: For more information about over/under processing,
refer to How To Get An Unbalanced Tender Control In Balance (Fixing Over/Under).
Division/Contract Type | Service Type | Distrib.Code | Debt Class | Bill Seg Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA/OVR UNDR | Other | EXP-OV/UND | N/A | Not billed |
Notice the following about the new contract type:
- It has an interesting distribution code. This is because when a payment segment is applied to this type of contract, the system must debit an expense account for under amounts (and credit it for over amounts).
- It doesn't need a bill segment type because the system never creates bill segments for such contracts (it only has over/under payment segments linked to it).
- It uses the N/A debt class because the credit and collections process should never consider debt associated with contracts of this type (because it's not really debt).