You may run into problems with enumerated properties if you assign option codes that collide with option code values assigned by an ATG product. As an example, consider the case of payment groups in ATG Commerce. ATG Commerce defines 3 payment group subtypes with values 0, 1, and 2. Suppose you define an additional 3 payment group subtypes with values 3, 4, and 5. If the next ATG release of ATG Commerce were to add two new payment group subtypes with values 3 and 4, these values would collide with two of your additional 3 payment group subtypes using these same values.

In order to avoid collisions between option codes used by your repository definition and any option codes used in subsequent ATG products, you should observe the following convention in assigning option codes to enumerated property values:

Project

Reserved Option Code Values

customer use

0 - 999 (Note that some of these values 1 – 100 might already be used in older ATG versions. Check the repository definition file for the property in those cases. It may be better to limit your option code values to 101 - 999.)

DAF

1000 - 1999

DPS

2000 - 2999

DSS

3000 - 3999

ATG Commerce B2C

4000 - 4999

ATG Commerce B2B

5000 - 5999

ATG Portal

6000 - 6999

ATG Outreach

7000 - 7999

ATG Content Administration

8000 - 8999

ATG Ticketing

9000 - 9999

ATG Knowledge and Self Service

10000 - 10999

ATG Commerce Service Center

11000 - 11999

ATG Response Management

12000 - 12999

ATG Search

13000 - 13999

Agent

14000 - 14999

ATG Chat

15000 - 15999

future ATG use

16000 +

In the unlikely event that you need more than 1000 separate values for a single enumerated property, you can also use negative integers as option code values.

 
loading table of contents...